AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Print Review Spotted to be released over the weekend

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, Mar 23, 2018.

  1. Hilbert Hagedoorn

    Hilbert Hagedoorn Don Vito Corleone Staff Member

    Messages:
    48,324
    Likes Received:
    18,405
    GPU:
    AMD | NVIDIA
    Embra likes this.
  2. manowarfreak

    manowarfreak Guest

    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    MSI GTX 1080 Ti
    Rickrolled!
     
  3. Humanoid_1

    Humanoid_1 Guest

    Messages:
    959
    Likes Received:
    66
    GPU:
    MSI RTX 2080 X Trio
    Yeah, this was a good one lol
     
  4. harondutzu

    harondutzu Guest

    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    6
    GPU:
    1080TI
    Made in China ? Really ??
     

  5. Yogi

    Yogi Master Guru

    Messages:
    351
    Likes Received:
    150
    GPU:
    Sapphire RX 6800
    Nothing wrong with making something in China. Just gotta make sure to beat the QC guys with a big stick or offer them a nice carrot when they do well.
     
  6. Bojan

    Bojan Guest

    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    5
    GPU:
    EVGA GTX 1070 FTW
    I dont see no egg..... Someone show me :)
     
  7. warlord

    warlord Guest

    Messages:
    2,760
    Likes Received:
    927
    GPU:
    Null
    High Performance Mainstream to lower-Enthusiast CPU made in china. I already categorize this particular CPU branch as a really good oc'er. Buahahahahahahaha!
     
  8. Fox2232

    Fox2232 Guest

    Messages:
    11,808
    Likes Received:
    3,371
    GPU:
    6900XT+AW@240Hz
    Not that you can call Chip with Factory Turbo of 4.7GHz clocked to 5.2GHz a good OCer either. It's not even that impressive if one considers that before OC chip eats like 105W at peak and after like 210W.
    And if you add that mentioned chip uses toothpaste under IHS and reaches 88°C... Even with Liquid Cooling.
     
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2018
    __hollywood|meo and warlord like this.
  9. warlord

    warlord Guest

    Messages:
    2,760
    Likes Received:
    927
    GPU:
    Null
    Thermonuclear weapon at the size of a couple nanometers. :D
     
  10. sverek

    sverek Guest

    Messages:
    6,069
    Likes Received:
    2,975
    GPU:
    NOVIDIA -0.5GB
    You tell us boss once you get the package!
     

  11. thatguy91

    thatguy91 Guest

    The reviews of X370 vs X470 on the 1700X and 2700X will be interestinl, as long as all as the difference RAM speed makes.
     
    Killian38 likes this.
  12. Öhr

    Öhr Master Guru

    Messages:
    324
    Likes Received:
    65
    GPU:
    AMD RX 5700XT @ H₂O
    My vote on this being a dud. It was probably meant for the 1st of april and the twitter guy ****** up. either way, this just doesn't seem legit:
    that 2700X on a A320 board... I expect this to be either completely photoshopped (a 2200G as the base or mixed with a 1700X from the same angle to make things easier). At least a 2200G on a A320 board would make sense.
    Additionally, the 2700X is handled as an afterthought: 2200G gets named first despite 2700X being the "breaking news" in the issue.
    And dont forget that rick roll qr code as the final nail in the coffin. expect nothing trustworthy this weekend.

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2018
  13. Koniakki

    Koniakki Guest

    Messages:
    2,843
    Likes Received:
    452
    GPU:
    ZOTAC GTX 1080Ti FE
    Don't mind me... Just here for ol' Ricky.. :p
     
  14. Koniakki

    Koniakki Guest

    Messages:
    2,843
    Likes Received:
    452
    GPU:
    ZOTAC GTX 1080Ti FE
    How awesome would be if a french member of ours, went out, bought the magazine and scan it exclusively for Guru3D?!








    :D
     
  15. dean469

    dean469 Member Guru

    Messages:
    127
    Likes Received:
    12
    GPU:
    XFX RX480GTR @1385
    I'm pretty sure it would result in an awesome lawsuit.
     

  16. Koniakki

    Koniakki Guest

    Messages:
    2,843
    Likes Received:
    452
    GPU:
    ZOTAC GTX 1080Ti FE
  17. Dyseman

    Dyseman Member

    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    6
    GPU:
    RX-6800XT 16GB
    I'm really wanting to see that 486 DX2/4 vs Pentium article. Been wanting to upgrade. As long as they'll play DOOM II @ 60 fps!
     
  18. Elder III

    Elder III Guest

    Messages:
    3,737
    Likes Received:
    335
    GPU:
    6900 XT Nitro+ 16GB
    That google translate was painful.... I don't think I learned anything from it. lol I'll just wait for the real review when HH is ready with it. :)
     
  19. Koniakki

    Koniakki Guest

    Messages:
    2,843
    Likes Received:
    452
    GPU:
    ZOTAC GTX 1080Ti FE
    Yeah, I actually jumped on it and shared it when I saw it, without reading it first. My bad. lol

    Reason be is that I wait to read the review from HH first, but in the end it didn't have any useful info inside.

    And the funniest part, is that I made a fool of my self and sent it to HH also thinking it had good info. :p
     
    Last edited: Mar 26, 2018
  20. Evildead666

    Evildead666 Guest

    Messages:
    1,309
    Likes Received:
    277
    GPU:
    Vega64/EKWB/Noctua
    Got the mag this lunchtime to read on the train on the way home.
    Had a quick peek at lunch while the Boss was out, and its looking pretty good :)

    Main points :
    - 2700X Single core boost 4.3GHz, all core boost is 3.9.
    - 2700X pulls up to ~142W, 2600X ~103W, So a lot more power for a little more clock. This doesn't bode well for overclocking headroom.
    - The CPU Caches seem to have been made a little faster (L2 goes from 5.7ns to 4.1ns 1800X to 2700X)
    - The memory latency has been improved also ( @2666mem : 1800X-85ns, and 2700X-76ns)

    There is a lot more text to read, thats basically just the pictures. They are really peeved at the Power consumption figures, due to the 2700X being rated officially at 105W (when it can pull up to 140W). edit : and the 2600X is rated for 95W and pulls ~103, but the 2600 is rated for 65W and pulls nearly ~90W !
    They do mention that unofficially, the 2700X has been touted as having a 141W TDP....
    It would also seem that the move to 12nm only enabled higher clock frequencies, and not really any energy efficiences, but i'd like to see some undervolt tests first ;)
     
    Last edited: Mar 26, 2018
    jura11 likes this.

Share This Page