AMD Posts More RX 6900 XT and RX 6800 XT Benchmarks Tested on Ryzen 9 5900X

Wow, 6800 non XT beating 3090 in Battlefield 5 1440p... thats the slowest AMD card beating the fastest nVidia card right there.

 

These AMD's own measuments were interesting to see as a part of the product reveal presentation, but now they are somewhat meaningless. What we need are reputable third party reviews, such as Guru3D's. It doesn't matter how much AMD advertises its own products. But then again, after so many years of not being able to compete for real, I guess it's understandable.

 

Looking forward to a review of all these looks good so far.

 

That Battlefield V graph at 1440p though!
Prices are not what I expect to see, but its all still early and I understand AMD needs the money to keep going.
Hopefully these cards are available so people can buy them.

 

I really dont care about this, i wanne see real-time performance in games, and RT performance, when Hilbert Hagedoorn we see first reviews ?

 

Would love to see a smart access memory on and off benchmark when the cards come out to see the performance benefit it generates in benchmarks.

 

this.
Every benchmark here is reported with Smart Memory Access on, but we don't know how much of an improvement is.
Since many people is going to use a 6800/6800XT on an already existing platform (like my 3900X) I'd like to know how it will compare to Nvidia solutions.

 

Considering that a very few of us have a 500 series board and going to ryzen 5xxx, I think your point is quite important for a vast majority of users.

 

Minus 5-13% so the cards are close to the competing products.

AMD already showed how much it can improve

 

AMD has always had an edge in Battlefield V.

 

Those bars represent frames per dollar!

Wake up people. And if it's true to form like the last benchmarks, that won't be average FPS, but 'maximum' FPS.

AMD are doing a classic AMD, over hyping their products.

 

What is cool in this AMD comparaison page (https://www.amd.com/en/gaming/graphics-gaming-benchmarks) is that you have the perf/$ of each card.

If it can be trusted, the RTX3070 and the 6800XT are the "best" cards for their price.
Indeed, the RTX3900 and the 6900Xt are way overpriced, and that shows here.

 

Troll Alert?
Lets wait and see but on the surface it looks like AMD has pretty much done an Intel on Nvidia and we have not seen the best yet am told by a friend in China

 

The numbers from AMD seem too good to be true but who knows... What´s the day of the review?

 

You can tell by how much the 6800 out performs the 2080ti, in reality its the same as the 3070 so much slower in those graphs if you don't also have the cpu and mobo. I don't mind buying the whole platform though as I need a whole new pc so it could be a big selling point, even more so for system builders looking to get higher FPS charts for their PC's at lower prices than the competition who don't use it

 

You are absolutely right, but I think it's a good sign that a company is confident enough to show charts where its own product is slower than the competition (Intel vs. AMD in Battlefield V, 6800 XT vs. 3080 in Division 2, Resident Evil 3 or Wolfenstein: Youngblood).

 

But then again perf difference between 3070 and 2080ti on avg is 1%.

So all in all the 6800 will end up faster anyway as it's leading by some 20% at points.

 

Man this is the first time ever in graphics card history I was excited to buy an ATI or AMD product FIRST at a launch.

Well first for everything! 6800 XT and 6900 XT look sweet!

 

Wait for independent reviews then? /shrug. But if you enjoy leaving "I really don't care about this- {insert stuff}" and injecting your attitude immediately as though you were someone of status.... By all means your highness?