AMD FX-8150 Retail (Bulldozer) Review by lab501

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by king-dubs, Oct 9, 2011.

Tags:
  1. midweskid

    midweskid Guest

    Nah they weren't falsified, check out the memory they were using. That benchmark can differ greatly depending on the memory being used. Though I'm still looking forward to other reviews.
     
  2. k3vst3r

    k3vst3r Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,702
    Likes Received:
    177
    GPU:
    KP3090
    2600k @ 4.6 does 74k on photoworxx

    [​IMG]
     
  3. Anarion

    Anarion Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    13,599
    Likes Received:
    386
    GPU:
    GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
    Yup. They used 2200MHz low latency ram @ 1866MHz with 8-8-8-24 1T . That explains it all and makes it even worse for BD.
     
  4. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Guest

    Messages:
    22,104
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    does ht affect photowerxx? Im getting 66000ish 4.8 no ht. ram is at 1600
     

  5. k3vst3r

    k3vst3r Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,702
    Likes Received:
    177
    GPU:
    KP3090
    i would say no mate watched task manager as i hit bench an doesn't go beyond 50% on my 2600k with HT enabled :)
     
  6. Exodite

    Exodite Guest

    Messages:
    2,087
    Likes Received:
    276
    GPU:
    Sapphire Vega 56
    I get 53.7k at stock clocks using DDR3-1333.

    Assuming the reviewer used the same DDR3-2200 memory for the 2600K as they did for the Bulldozer chip I suppose scaling to 66k isn't at all unreasonable, since there's a 4.6K difference between DDR3-1333 and DDR3-1600.

    Being that reliant on memory performance makes the test less than useful though.
     
  7. Trolle

    Trolle Guest

    Messages:
    1,045
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Gigabyte RTX3070
    this

    but i still hope BD performs better then that
     
  8. k3vst3r

    k3vst3r Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,702
    Likes Received:
    177
    GPU:
    KP3090
    i took my memory up from 1911 to 1924 an gained 1k points at 75k now on photoworxx
     
  9. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Guest

    Messages:
    22,104
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    [​IMG]

    Uploaded with ImageShack.us

    4.8HT but with rams at 2133mhz, dont know why I took a cpuz of cpu speed. speed step:biggun:
     
  10. midweskid

    midweskid Guest

    Ty tommy, and others for the confirmation on the benchmark.
     

  11. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Guest

    Messages:
    22,104
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    that one really likes memory speed and bandwith. especially SB
     
  12. deluxe

    deluxe Guest

    Messages:
    248
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Gigabyte 980Ti G1
    I want to know how this baby performs in BF3, as even a 6-core i7 can be pulled to 100%..
     
  13. crap daddy

    crap daddy Guest

    Messages:
    754
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    EVGA GTX960 SSC
    Everything is legit in that preview. They are a respectable source and have done their best to test the FX. It is not their fault that Bulldozer turns out to be a disaster. Of course we'll have to wait a few more days to have this confirmed from other respectable sources but everything, and I mean everything points out that BD is bad. The only question that remains is how bad...
     
  14. Mkilbride

    Mkilbride Banned

    Messages:
    8,057
    Likes Received:
    2
    GPU:
    EVGA GTX470 1.2GB
    Maybe it'll be like Phenom, where a bios revision or whatever can upgrade the speed by 20%. Doubtful, though.
     
  15. redrumy3

    redrumy3 Master Guru

    Messages:
    456
    Likes Received:
    16
    GPU:
    Nvidia 3090 FE
    except for the copy of windows 7 :vader:
     

  16. Rich_Guy

    Rich_Guy Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    13,138
    Likes Received:
    1,091
    GPU:
    MSI 2070S X-Trio
    WOW what a fail :(
     
  17. Scorch666

    Scorch666 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,874
    Likes Received:
    23
    GPU:
    RTX 4060 laptop
    Please say it aint so. Iam disappoint.:wanker:
     
  18. The_Fool

    The_Fool Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,015
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    2xGIGABYTE Windforce 7950
    One guy says the reviews are completely legit and the source is good. Another guy says they are fake and the source is not to be trusted. I guess we have no choice but to wait for Guru3d, a source we all know to be good.

    My current CPU at this max overclock gets a score of only 3.29 in Cinebench, so no matter what the FX-8150 will be a large upgrade for me.
     
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2011
  19. Mannerheim

    Mannerheim Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,915
    Likes Received:
    95
    GPU:
    MSI 6800XT
    Photowerxx uses only 80% of all my cpu cores.. wtf???
     
  20. GeniusPr0

    GeniusPr0 Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,439
    Likes Received:
    108
    GPU:
    Surpim LiquidX 4090
    guys read the entire thread. the 2600k is only supposed to do 3.5ghz using turbo with all 4 cores aka ALL multithreaded benchmarks.

    wait for real reviews.
     

Share This Page