Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Rich_Guy, Nov 26, 2014.
This is the 380X, and it's better than a GTX 980. :funny:
"One more thing, the name “Radeon R9 390X” isn’t actually confirmed for the card being shown in the chart, its speculated based on the fact that it is the fastest shown graphics card in the chart and hence leads to the conclusion that this could be the upcoming “flagship” card from AMD to rival NVIDIA’s GM 204 chip architecture."
The weird thing is that the original leaker just posted those charts and then he just vanished.To me it sounds more like a damage control from AMD,I mean the GTX 9xx series is selling that good that they need to pull something like those charts...just my 2 cents on this.We still need to remeber that the next card from AMD will come on something like february and that is months away.
Why didnt you RMA the 660's ? no way thats normal!
Lol because I have an accurate opinion I'm a troll, huge lol. There is no such thing as a troll in my book, its a stupid pathetic modern day meaning by the internet geeks of today.
You obviously did not game on the 8/16 bit machines from 1980s cause in those days there was no such thing and there still isn't by my standards. Brainless the youth are today.
I think they were called gorillas back then
Oh the damage control is done with the 295X2 on sale for $679 at the egg.
And that didn`t do anything to slow down the GTX 9xx series...
No, it won't with 65% of the market share in NVIDIA's favor.
I don't want to feed the trolls, but just to mention what I was wondering the last two days, nobody seems to want to mention that AMD beats the GM204 performance.... against the mid class chip. That's why I personally expect the Titan2 or whatever it's called to beat it, just because on paper it's supposed to be 40 to 50% faster than the 980. And then, once again faster than the 390X on the charts posted, but only by a little bit.
The most interesting thing about the next AMD card won't be power consumption, or raw performance, and not even heat or noise (which are quite important to me personally), but at what price it'll be released. That's the true battleground, because what's the best chip's use if it's incredibly expensive (yeah I'm talking to you NV!)
Nice numbers. Hope its all true.
Hope 2x would be great for 4K gaming.
Anything that lowers prices is okay IMO.
However, after jumping from AMD to NVIDIA, I think AMD should try to do something with their software, CCC It's just not as fast as nvidias CP (slow opening...), many less options... 0 support for downscaling (Spent 3-4hours gathering info and registry hacking with AMD to get it, 30min with nvidia...)
Wow so much cores and 10 fps faster, this must be a lie cause the specs. I think it will be much faster.
Them were the days, when 128mb of memory was a huge amount
Like gaming on those things have anything to do with this and there was no internet you couldn't possibly stir up anything on forums nor does the fact you were born some 11 years earlier and played more on 8/16bit things. But your post seems like a flamebait none the less. And that would be called trolling so a troll post.
Accurate opinion there is nothing accurate about that. It is an opinion for sure and posting it on AMD topic is flamebaiting.
Specs?Pls share with us the specs of the the card,the 390X.The official specs not what ppl like to speculate on forums.
You want some flamebait I will give you some.
"The Titan II will piss all over the R390x and while its doing it will use less power and run much cooler"
Hows that? Or do you want me to add more to it?
Its my opinion and a very good one considering the technology that Nvidia has atm.
If you don't like the thread then GTFO and go cry to your Mother or something.
^ Oh boy,some ppl will be very angry at u post!How dare u say that nV will release a faster card after the 390X is released!How dare you?
you are a funny guy. But nope considering the tech it won't eat less power then 980 unless it is 20nm since the difference between these leaked rumors would put 380x 20watts from 980 with 16% performance increase. So yea I think that part nope. Else it could very well be faster.