After beta, Battlefield 2042 system requirements were altered.

Damn, running this game on a 4 core 4 thread cpu? Not gonna be a great experience.

 

Probably be the same as running CP2077 on quad. Hope Guru3d will have benchmarks.

 

Is that with the 12900k ? Got a screenie with performance metrics on ?

 

Indeed.

But i would still love to see a screenie with performance metrics on, if you got it

In the beta, even when i locked the fps to 58 fps, using g-sync, i would get nearly constant stuttering, which is evident in the frametime graph

Spoiler

This was using the ultra settings - i had to set it to low to get it smooth. From what i could see, it is because the game is doing way too aggressive streaming, rather than load the vram / ram, which is stupid - could probably be alleviated by having a vram slider like in CoD, where you can control how much vram the game is allowed to use.

Spoiler

 

Why DLSS t just 3440x1440 on a 3090? I mean, other than if you're getting such low FPS. I would expect to get more on a 3090.. Even at 60% utilization.

 

Can you people play because I still can't...they said to me that it isn't out yet...

 

This is exactly the thing. Nvidia is making you use dlss even at 1440p this days otherwise your framerate sucks even if using 3090.

Look at this crap. My question is also why the hell is fps so low without dlss

 

this is rt on dlss off at 4K

 

Haven't played yet myself, but from what I'm hearing from friends performance is pretty much as bad or worse than with the beta. Can't say I'm surprised really, but there was a tiny bit of hope that I had for this.

 

Still does not make sense. Difference is staggering and without dlss card is underperforming for some reason same as BF.

 

we should find amd rx6000 for comparison
you might be on to something,amd is getting way higher fps at native while nvidia requires you to compensate with dlss

 

I thought so too. Was watching Joker production performance review on the game FIST and he was impressed by the dlss performance but natively it runs really bad.

Dlss is their future right?

 

yes but how does rx6000 do at native if you think it's nvidia underperforming ?
cause to me it looks like RT is killing performance at 4K native,like I said in the first response
https://www.purepc.pl/bright-memory-infinite-rtx-test-wydajnosci-ray-tracing-i-dlss?page=0,7

you think they're "underperforming without dlss",then show us rx6900 running this faster at native.

and is bf2042 really running better on amd too ? I think not. then why is it "nvidia" underperforming ? cause to me it looks like both are runniong poorly,but nvidia has the option of dlss - same or higher than native,runs faster,draws less power.somehow this is bad ?

 

Its an unreal 4 game which we know who wins but it will be more interesting how 6900XT performs vs 3090 in BF. Maybe Hilbert will do the review.

 

ahhh so it's nvidia underperforming,but amd results are to be blamed on unreal engine.
if it's the engine,how come hub has borderlands3 showing amd just wiping the floor with nvidia ? it's an ue4 game

Spoiler

is it because you choose facts selectively ? and hub are full of crap cause no other source shows 6600xt matching 3060ti or 6700xt beating 3070,and hub just flipped the result where nvidia won to show amd higher in avg. charts

Spoiler

this is so confusing

 

Is your brain seriously unable to compute, that he is being limited by something else than his gpu, hence his low gpu usage...

 

The guy have 12900k with ddr5 memory. He can be only limited by crappy game optimization.

 

Kinda bad example though, cause what makes the fps so bad is 1. bad implementation of raytracing 2. game made by a single dude, hence optimization aint gonna be great regardless.

 

Read his comments above

That said, it's obvious that this game engine can't properly handle 128 players.