Hello, I wanted to choose between the Sabrent Rocket 4 2TiB and the Samsung 980Pro 2TiB. In the Sabrent test, we can see the 980Pro 1TiB is outperforming everyone in the third line /: https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/sabrent_rocket_4_plus_2tb_nvme_ssd_review,14.html 3435 versus 748 => the Sabrent seems toasted in this particular test. In fact, the test isn't the same : It's Q32T16 for the 980Pro and Q32T1 for the Sabrent Rocket 4 ! We can see than in the screenshots below, for all SSD with 3-thousands in this line, it's Q32T16, and for the others it's Q32T1. Honestly, I know I'm at fault for not seeing that immediately, and you emphasize enough int he test that this is the PCMark 8 one that is the more representative of the real world perf ; but you should really write a warning in the description line in the top of the page. I genuinely thought at first that Samsung had developed some specific technology that kicks-in in some particular use case. Another thought : What is baffling is that although the Sabrent seems better in almost all synthetic benchmarks, if we take the "real world file copy" test, which seems to me more what I would do with the disk, the 980Pro is better : https://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/sabrent-rocket-4-plus-2tb-nvme-ssd-review,11.html https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/samsung_980_pro_1tb_nvme_ssd_review,11.html But, I would not know that if I didn't go read the 980Pro test because there is no comparison table for this test. That's a shame. Thank you for your time.