Discussion in 'Videocards - NVIDIA GeForce' started by alanm, Jan 23, 2015.
So do I get $100 also?
Yeah and all 980 users get minus the price what we bought it for, then i say its a deal
LOL no. theres like 20% of disgruntled 970 users, rest are just the usual woodscrews kooks
To be fair I would like $100 refund per card as well.
Does nVidia Inspector also get its info from a database?
AIDA64 too ?
Ahh, i always thought it reported it directly from the card.
Mine reaches 98-99% utilization rather easily. In fact, it pretty well stays there nearly 24/7.....
More than likely, yes. Otherwise they wouldn't be able to identify new products.
Yea same, I get the odd game that drops usage and fps, but Ive had that throughout multiple AMD cards too, badly optimised games is all
When I had my 295, I had to email the GPUz dev for him to add OpenCL detection for my card, and he sent me a new GPUz exe which fixed it
That last half a gig RAM does actually make a difference for me since I run at 1440p often with mods which make games much more demanding on the RAM. If I knew about all this beforehand I would have saved money and bought an R9 290X.
I actually called the store I bought this card from and they said they would refund me or exchange it for a 290X if I like. My options are the MSI 290X with the same cooler as this for $430 + tax - $100 MIR (if it ever arrives) so I'd save $77 if I ever get that mail in rebate. Or the Gigabyte Windforce model for $370 + tax - $20 MIR which would end up saving me $65 but is less of a gamble on the annoying mail in rebate.
I have 3 issues though:
1 - The obvious MIR, those are never a guarantee, companies always find a way to deny you those.
2 - This specific card I got happens to be a unicorn as far as overclocking goes, there is no guarantee whichever 290X I get ends up OCing enough to actually outperform this even with proper use of 4GB in games that need it.
3 - My PSU is years old, the capacitors on it have to be degraded, I'm concerned about how much a heavily OC'd 290X will stress it.
So now I'm left wondering if saving a bit of money and saying F U nVidia is worth the hassle.
All 780ti owners who overpaid for their cards so long ago. I am going to start a cry baby thread aimed at nvidia. Same screen names same exact posts on multiple forums etc along the lines of this abomination of a thread. Wa Wa I paid $750 per card thats only a tad faster than a $330 970.
Seriouusly though $1500 bucks for 2 video cards and you don`t see me whinning about it.
That post I made was for a different petition, claiming that both the 970 and the 980 have a low GPU usage issue
290X will suck a lot more power from the PSU than the 970/980, if it was me Id stick with nvidia / get a refund if it's really causing you problems and save for the 980 / find a 780ti
I run F@H..... I generally only spend 3-4 hours a week "gaming"....
OpenCL it can pickup from the drivers if coded to. The rest has to be coded to a database.
well, you got what you wanted. go with the 290x. that 0.5gb vram will really make all the difference.
Don't you have something to do aside from making snide remarks all day?
I'm addicted to this thread..must stop reading and do my invoices.....
Dunno I am at 1440p I don`t have any problems, an extra 500mb isnt going to do much unless you run triple screens or 4k
Do you really think that going with the 290x will be a better option? They're both about the same, performance wise. The 290x will run hotter and louder. and the extra 0.5gb will make zero difference. you're jumping through hoops for a sidegrade, at best.
It's also funny how until now your 970 was fine, but now suddenly you need the full 4gb to run 1440p lol. 1440p user here too, btw.
Well as fun as this has been to read, I'm off to bed, no doubt i`ll be able to catch up with ease in the morning
I got 2 feet+ of snow coming so I`ll be here. uke2: