81.95 Win32

Discussion in 'Videocards - NVIDIA GeForce Drivers Section' started by rflair, Nov 22, 2005.

  1. Paymaster

    Paymaster New Member

    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    XFX 7800GT
  2. Bombero

    Bombero Active Member

    Messages:
    53
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Saphire x1950 Pro AGP 512 Zalman OC
    GSB,



    Do I need the PCI expansion slot bracket also? It looks like the fan is so big that I might need it? Did you need it?
     
  3. NecroDemonNZXT

    NecroDemonNZXT Master Guru

    Messages:
    490
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    ATI HD4850
    tried em 2, IQ isnt that good but quake4 performance seems a bit better, like B&W 2 did,also colours seem like a bit better especially in quake 4....they r keepers for now :p
     
  4. F1refly

    F1refly Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    9,042
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    970GTX-oc edition
    perhaps someone could show me some screenshot comparisons of I.Q cuz everyone saying iq with 81.xx is better but i cant see no difference since the early 7x.xx's
     

  5. GaRd3NiA

    GaRd3NiA Active Member

    Messages:
    90
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Leadtek A400TDH(16x1,6)@300/415/920
    81.95 sucks, it bring more stuttering to my NFSMW...
    when using official 77.77, just only 1/2 second stuttering, n it dun appear so offen, but after i change to 81.95, it start stuttering so often n longer...
    i duno wat's the problem, so i went back to my 77.77...
    oh, WTF, now my 77.77 also hv the same problem with 81.95...
    fed up with this driver, make me canot enjoy "being wanted" at all..
     
  6. Wildman95GS-T

    Wildman95GS-T Master Guru

    Messages:
    409
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Intel HD Graphics 2000
    Have you tried the 82.04's ? they work better for me and my system than all the modded and non-modded 81.xx drivers out there today :)
     
  7. WiCz

    WiCz Member Guru

    Messages:
    172
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    R9 290X OC WF
    81.95's are fine here..maybe a 1 or 2 % performance increase over the 81.94's if any and IQ is great ;)
     
  8. gunslinger

    gunslinger Master Guru

    Messages:
    440
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    1 EVGA GTX titan 6gig SC
    no problems here. But then I' guess I've been lucky with few graphics problems :D
     
  9. TeaEtchSee

    TeaEtchSee Master Guru

    Messages:
    717
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    XFX 7950gt (Winfast a400gt RIP)
    CRT problem still exsist but atleast GW is fixed :)

    fast set by the way
     
  10. AdventChild

    AdventChild New Member

    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
    Erm, this may not be like much but final fantasy 8 has serious graphics glitch when this driver was installed. . sigh.

    I'm usin fx 5950
     

  11. F1refly

    F1refly Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    9,042
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    970GTX-oc edition
    well nevermind i made my own, still dont see a difference

    81.85 49C idle temps
    3dmark05-4009
    gta_sa- 47.575
    quake4-23.425
    farcry -54.000

    81.89 -47C
    3dmark05- 5454
    gta_sa - 46.483
    quake4- 30.108
    farcry- 60.000

    81.94 45C
    3dmark05- 5455
    quake4- 44.733
    farcry- 49.358
    nfs:mostwanted-33.558

    81.95 44C
    3dmark05-5460
    quake4-50.1
    nfs:mostwanted-32.376
    farcry -65.1



    I.Q. comparisons

    81.89
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    81.95
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  12. kovboi

    kovboi Master Guru

    Messages:
    286
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    VisionTek HD4850
    wow, nice work xrc6! :D
     
  13. F1refly

    F1refly Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    9,042
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    970GTX-oc edition
    thanks i just been writing each result down and saving it so i can copynpaste so its not much work really, but soon the posts will get too long. so i may ween out iq comparisons pics

    i will note that nfs:most wanted was the only game that appeared somewhat glitchier with 81.95 than 81.89 but not bad
     
  14. Staus1

    Staus1 Member

    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    2 x Leadtek 7800 GTX in SLI
    These are the best drivers yet for my rig. The image Quality i amazing and QUAKE 4 is on fire with these drivers. Still COD2 has some nasty slowdowns UNBELIVABLE with 2 x GTX in SLI :-(. Im running COD2 in 1680 X 1050 with 2 X AA and AF on , SLI on , AND it looks really stunning with these drivers GOOD job Nvidia :). Now we can just wait for a patch so that we can get rid of these nasty slowdowns in COD2 :-(. The Xbox 360 version is running COD2 in all its glory with no slowdowns (makes you wonder why one has used all that cash on 2 x 7800 GTX)

    Cheers Staus1
     
  15. DaveOwl

    DaveOwl Member

    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    BFG 8800 GTS
    Think i'll stick with the 81.94's. Too much 'risk' for so little extra or even less in some cases.......if I miss out, well I miss out :)
     

  16. lewis_johnstone

    lewis_johnstone Active Member

    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    ATI 4870 X2 CrossfireX
    Possible graphical errors on 512mb 7800gtx?

    Hi there,

    I was just playin some BF2 and when i was using the controlled rocket fire view from chopper gunner seat, view was gettin a bit wavy in places? like disturbances flucuating on part of teh screen?

    I've also noticed in BF2 that when i shoot the water, there are no splashes?

    Has the water always been like this? Surely thats not right?
     
  17. -tlx!

    -tlx! Member

    Messages:
    10
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Asus V9999GT/TD 256@ULTRA@PCI Latency 64
    The disturbances were added with the latest 1.12 BF2 patch :D
     
  18. Toxic Worrier

    Toxic Worrier Master Guru

    Messages:
    937
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX 275
    Way to go Bro !
    I get that same kinda glitchy feelin with 81.95, Mainly in NFSMW. Good now I know I wasn't just feeling the drugs a little bit more while using that driver. ha ha.... 81.89 is smoother in every game I have right now, so I went back....
    Thanks for the Xtra effort brohiem,
    good luck
     
  19. Ac1d|BuRn

    Ac1d|BuRn Member

    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Sparkle 8800 GTS PCIe
    some more benches from me, for all y'all wanting to compare driver performance a bit...
    (rig can be seen to the right)

    Doom3
    1024 UHQ, 2x FSAA - 89,6 fps ### Detonator 81.95 WHQL
    1024 UHQ, 2x FSAA - 88,6fps ### Detonator 81.87
    1024 UHQ, 2x FSAA - 87,6fps ### Detonator 80.40
    1024 UHQ, 2x FSAA - 00,0fps ### Detonator 77.50

    3D Mark 05
    5047 3DMarks ### Detonator 81.95 WHQL
    4952 3DMarks ### Detonator 81.87
    5047 3DMarks ### Detonator 80.40
    4867 3DMarks ### Detonator 77.50

    3D Mark 03
    11519 3DMarks ### Detonator 81.95 WHQL
    11482 3DMarks ### Detonator 81.87
    11479 3DMarks ### Detonator 80.40
    11216 3DMarks ### Detonator 77.50

    Aquamark 3
    63633 ### Detonator 81.95 WHQL
    63216 ### Detonator 81.87
    62749 ### Detonator 80.40
    00000 ### Detonator 77.50
     
  20. Tyson123

    Tyson123 Active Member

    Messages:
    87
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Aopen 6800GT@stock 81.95
    Thanks Ac1d, these are good posts!
     

Share This Page