Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, Feb 17, 2017.
Here you go, set the multiplier to 40
Here are the results
Lols, within 2 points from calculated estimate. So score by frequency coefficient seems to give spot-on results and the scaling is linear.
Yeah so it basically has Skylake/KabbyLake IPC performance, not bad, not bad at all.
Actually the math itself should be within 1 point difference since i didn't made the calculations on the actual speeds they were runing cause i zeroed them eg. he is not at 4000MHz but 3999.07 but yes the bench is preatty much scalling very linear so IF this screenshot is REAL the ZEN single core no matter 4/6/8 cores should be notch faster clock for clock than Kaby Lake in this bench which actually starts to get less scores per clock above 5.0GHz probably some error corrections but the results i checked so far ones from below 5 GHz is puting it when equalized to 4.0GHz in the 2033 region.
IPC is quite a bit more efficient than i expected. i thought zen would trail skylake by ~5-10% dependent upon the operation...lets see those ingame benches come march
If this is all true that means I'll be able to run Borderlands 2 "single threaded" with physX cranked up LOL. Thanks AMD, you're only 5 years late..
Maybe i'm just being Cynical here but i'm finding myself questioning the validity of this post, with the two separate images sticking out like a sore thumb. we have no way of knowing if the CPU-Z benchmark comes from an overclocked Ryzen chip or not, nor do we know what version has been used.
Hopefully i'm wrong, it would be great if these results were real or even within 5%
Also Hey, new to the fourms this is my first ever message! Thanks HH for all your hard work been reading your articles for years now.
A good example of progress when you look at my ageing 6 core 1090t at 3.8ghz
Single Thread 771
Multi Thread 4177
Ryzen 6 core
I was planning an 8 core Ryzen but realistically the 6 core would be a very good upgrade.
That photo - i would say- that they are saying - it booted bro, it booted!
If these CPU's are as good as they seem, it should light a fire inside Intel. Not long to wait now until we find out.
Here is mine i7-5820k with 4.5GHz OC
If these scores are true,then this chip should be nice upgrade
I'm just waiting on proper benches from HH and then will decide,but from these leaks I think its no brainier for me to upgrade
Hope this helps
2033 / 7931
Just thought I'd toss in a 6850K @ 4.5ghz for comparison.
Uh... are you not aware PhysX is an Nvidia technology? Are you not aware it is GPU accelerated in Borderlands 2? Are you not aware you are using an Nvidia GPU?
Either you're trying WAY too hard to troll or you're an idiot.
i5 3470 @ 3912 : 1698/6552
Stock 4790k here
1992 single thread and 7434 multi thread.
Did anyone noticed that core voltage? Only 0.374v?
Mine on idle eating 0.777 volts according the cpu-z readings.
He might be alluding to the relatively poor IPC of prior AMD models....
So, he's just an incompetent troll.
i73770k @ 4.5ghz
Why is the color of the edge of CPU-Z in one of the two pictures in yellow while that in the other one of the two pictures is in white? I wonder if these two pictures of CPU-Z came from the same computer.
Mmmmmm why the does tittle bar have different text align and button spacing???