6-core Ryzen 5 1600X Benchmarks shows 50% faster than Core i5 7600K

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, Feb 17, 2017.

  1. slick3

    slick3 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,866
    Likes Received:
    231
    GPU:
    RTX 2070 +85/1200
    Those leaks are being released in such an orderly fashion. :3eyes:
     
  2. PrMinisterGR

    PrMinisterGR Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    8,085
    Likes Received:
    928
    GPU:
    Inno3D RTX 3090
    Interesting that the 6 core seems to have the full 16MB L3. I wonder if that makes it have a tad better IPC than the 8 core in cache-sensitive operations.
     
  3. passenger

    passenger Master Guru

    Messages:
    463
    Likes Received:
    91
    GPU:
    Sapphire RX580 8GB
    WOW! FX 6300 really kick ass for that 90€ when I bought it, 2500K was ~230-250€ as I remember.

    [​IMG]
     
  4. H83

    H83 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,264
    Likes Received:
    1,734
    GPU:
    MSI Duke GTX1080Ti
    I made the math in a minute because i had to go so i didn´t remember that the speed difference is that big.
    But then it means that Ryzen has the same IPC has Kaby Lake, like buhehe already said, and that seems to good to be true, at least to me...

    Things are getting interesting, that´s for sure.
     

  5. nz3777

    nz3777 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,481
    Likes Received:
    214
    GPU:
    Gtx 980 Strix
    Oh boy! Now if they price them around $200-$250 max they will sell like hotcakes in my opinion. Looks hella-good cant wait to see how they do in gaming benchmarks.
     
  6. Amx85

    Amx85 Master Guru

    Messages:
    333
    Likes Received:
    10
    GPU:
    MSI R7-260X2GD5/OC
    FX8320E

    3.20GHz Base, 3.50GHz Turbo for all Threads, 4.00GHz 1 to 4 Threads (1 per module)
     
  7. Jagman

    Jagman Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,259
    Likes Received:
    322
    GPU:
    8GB RX6600
    If this all goes to plan for AMD (and us), even the 1400X 4c/8t could be a great budget gaming CPU right now especially @ 4.5GHz + :)
     
  8. AsiJu

    AsiJu Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    8,202
    Likes Received:
    2,917
    GPU:
    MSI RX6800XT G.XT.
  9. Jagman

    Jagman Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,259
    Likes Received:
    322
    GPU:
    8GB RX6600
    Yeah, my old FX6300 had the same L3 cache as the FX8xxx
     
  10. slick3

    slick3 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,866
    Likes Received:
    231
    GPU:
    RTX 2070 +85/1200
    Now that I have a vague idea of the prices, I think I will settle on a 6700k + Z170 pro gaming + 16GB combo which I am getting for a killer price, and much lower than if I buy a Zen CPU with new mobo and RAM.

    So hopefully I don't regret it... :nerd:
     

  11. r3lu

    r3lu Member

    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    ASUS ROG Strix GTX 1080Ti
    I suspect the CPU-Z score is a FAKE.

    My 6900K with a fixed clock of @ 3.9Ghz and 6 of the 8 cores enabled in BIOS obtains a score of 1878/11427 points, resulting a multi-thread gain of x6.084. The Ryzen X1600 score is 1888/12544 points, with a multi-thread gain of x6.644.That is just wrong. If the CPU was using Turbo mode, then the single thread score should be much higher, and the multi-thread gain lower than x6, since the CPU is using a higher single-core frequency than with multi-core.

    Even with an identical single and multi-thread frequency the multi-thread score is way disproportioned, much higher than the single-thread score should dictate… Unless this is an 8 core CPU and they just run the test with 12 threads enabled. This way the benchmark runs automatically on all 8 cores, leaving just a few unused hyper-threaded virtual cores. That would explain the strange results.
     
  12. TheDeeGee

    TheDeeGee Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    8,324
    Likes Received:
    2,310
    GPU:
    NVIDIA GTX 1070 8GB
    My 4770K @ 4,5 GHz.

    ST: 1929
    MT: 8870
     
  13. Denial

    Denial Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    13,973
    Likes Received:
    3,732
    GPU:
    EVGA RTX 3080
    Wouldn't that depend on how AMD's turbo implementation works?
     
  14. chispy

    chispy Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    9,445
    Likes Received:
    1,838
    GPU:
    MSI RTX 4090
    For reference , 3570K @ 4.6Ghz



    [​IMG]
     
  15. fry178

    fry178 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,898
    Likes Received:
    328
    GPU:
    Aorus 2080S WB
    S: 1700
    M: 7000

    3770k@stock
     

  16. hpascoa

    hpascoa Member

    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    AORUS Radeon RX580 8G
    Those 2 screenshots were taken on different computers. Look at the window buttons on the top-right corner of each window, the shell theme is different. I believe the top photo is Windows 10 and the bottom one is Windows 8. That doesn't automatically mean the scores are fake, but it certainly does nothing to prove the scores are from the Ryzen CPU depicted on the second screenshot. I guess they could have upgraded the OS between taking the 2 screenshots, or have 2 different Ryzen machines on hand running a different OS.
     
  17. gall

    gall New Member

    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Gtx 970
    You are wrong. It all depends on how they implemented the Hyper Threading feature.
    As an example, my old dual Xeon x5670 gets

    • 1153 single thread
    • 14632 multi thread (12 cores and 24 threads)

    for a ratio of 12.69
     
  18. Corbus

    Corbus Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,466
    Likes Received:
    72
    GPU:
    Moist 6900 XT
    2297 single threaded and 10323 multi threaded for me, Ryzen is gonna be nice! Won't upgrade to it though, will wait for the next tick/tock.
     
  19. Amx85

    Amx85 Master Guru

    Messages:
    333
    Likes Received:
    10
    GPU:
    MSI R7-260X2GD5/OC
    we don´t know all details about Turbo, maybe that model is @3.30GHz base 3.50GHz for all threads and 3.70GHz for half threads or 3.30GHz base 3.70GHz turbo for all threads and a bit more for 1 thread (XFR, eXtended Frequency Range)?

    CPUz bench is bad on multithreaded non optimized OS, check CPUz bench results before and after optimization with my FX-8320E
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnJRTfo3WXQ
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2017
  20. Amx85

    Amx85 Master Guru

    Messages:
    333
    Likes Received:
    10
    GPU:
    MSI R7-260X2GD5/OC
    The ratio is better if you consider Turbo Boost clocks for mono and multithreaded, if your CPU is @2.66GHz base, Turbo for all cores could be 2.80GHz, Turbo for half cores 2.93GHz and 3.07GHz for 3 or less cores, example:
    http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Core_i7/Intel-Core i7-4790K.html

    or your own model
    http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Xeon/Intel-Xeon X5670 - AT80614005130AA (BX80614X5670).html

    then you can divide mono and multi core score by respective clock

    1153/3.33GHz = 343.93
    14632/3.20GHz = 4752.5

    4752.5/343.93 = 13.818x
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2017

Share This Page