6-core Ryzen 5 1600X Benchmarks shows 50% faster than Core i5 7600K

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, Feb 17, 2017.

  1. Pestul

    Pestul Active Member

    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Zotac 970
    Early reaction to overclocks achieved with Ryzen.

    [​IMG]

    I can't wait!
     
  2. DARKSF

    DARKSF Member

    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well actually the correct way should be to calculate the points per MHz te get proper picture on IPC

    So for Ryzen 1888/3700=0.51027
    for @Anarion 3770K 1900/4400 = 0.43181
    for @Laci 2500K 1739/4600 = 0.37804
    for @justdoge 6600K 2286/4500= 0.508
    for @Only Intruder 4690K 1770/3900=0.45384
    for @Warrax 2600K 1706/4500 = 0.37911
    for @EL1TE 4670K 1909/4200 = 0.45452

    which means that if all is scalling in linear fashion with clock on this bench the results will look like this if all the CPUs were runing at 4GHz

    Ryzen 4000*0.51027 = 2041
    6600K 4000*0.508 = 2032
    4670K 4000*0.45452 = 1818
    4690K 4000*0.45384 = 1815
    3770K 4000*0.43181 = 1727
    2600K 4000*0.37911 = 1516
    2500K 4000*0.37804 = 1512

    Can someone of you guys clock to 4.0GHz to test this math ?
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2017
  3. waltc3

    waltc3 Master Guru

    Messages:
    453
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    1.305GHz Asus RX-480 8GB
    Have no idea whether this thread concerns literal information, of course, but what surprises me is why AMD upsetting the Intel apple cart should surprise anyone. AMD shutout & shut down Intel several years back with the A64--just blew the doors of poor ol' Intel's plans...;) It was even more surprising when it happened then, because no one else had managed such a feat. Indeed, Only AMD alone among all of the would-be Intel cpu competitor companies lived to survive and prosper. Intel has a nasty habit of eradicating competition through whatever means possible. AMD alone thus far is the only competitor to survive and best Intel in terms of technology and marketable products.

    In its "response" to A64, aside from paying retailers not to sell AMD cpus and threatening motherboard manufacturers who might dare to make and sell Intel competitor products, Intel cancelled the original Pentium architecture and went back to the drawing board only to come up with Core/2--made possible *only* because of a cross-license deal with AMD whereupon Intel obtained x86-64, the foundation for Core 2 and all else that has come after from Intel (Today's "Pentium" is not the actual Pentium architecture--it's merely another offshoot of Core2.)

    But what Intel wanted to do was to put the world on Itanium, and run the world's ram from Rdram. Rdram was many times costlier than DDR SDRAM, and going with Itanium--the only way Intel wanted to do 64-bits at all--would have meant dumping *all* of your x86 hardware & software..! Starting over from ground 0! Intel's vision, of course, was horrible--at least from the consumer's point of view. I'm sure the Itanium future looked very bright from Intel's corporate view, however...;) Thank goodness for AMD arriving like the proverbial calvary...!

    If AMD did it once I see no reason to think that AMD cannot do it a second time. I *hope* this is a case of AMD wanting *maximum impact*--people expecting less but getting a lot more at release time. The original Athlon was a complete surprise--and a delightful one. We shall see in a few days. And then it will be possible for people to see just how badly Intel has been gouging them over the last few years...;) We will also get to see what Intel's been hiding in reserve for a day like this--if anything at all.
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2017
  4. Warrax

    Warrax Active Member

    Messages:
    75
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Gigabyte 970 G1
    This is the kind of benchmark I've been looking for months! CPU-Z benchmark is a good reference in my opinion and it's quick and easy to use.

    Bench results are very impressive, about the same IPC and higher Multithread performance. This mean one thing: it will be all about MHZ. So if Ryzen overclock well, it will be a winner for everyone.

    Now I wonder if 5+ghz as the norm will be a thing, because Intel might push it that far if competition is fierce.

    My results (2600k @ 4.5ghz):
    ST: 1706
    MT: 7095
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2017

  5. Tuukka

    Tuukka Active Member

    Messages:
    59
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Asus GTX660 OC 2 GB
    Competition that's what we (consumers) need
     
  6. bigfutus

    bigfutus Master Guru

    Messages:
    414
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    MSI GTX 1080 Ti
    Looking good, so lets hope the availability will be adequate and there will be no problems with it.
     
  7. Denial

    Denial Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    11,042
    Likes Received:
    30
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080Ti
    CPU-Z is good but it only tests one type of workload. So we still don't really know yet if it's a winner for "everyone" or just gamers. Granted Guru3D is mostly, if not all gamers - but yeah.

    Regardless its definitely going to push Intel's pricing down and help AMD gain some marketshare back.
     
  8. EL1TE

    EL1TE Master Guru

    Messages:
    261
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    MSI Sea Hawk GTX 1080 X
    4670k @ 4.2Ghz:
    [​IMG]

    I'll pass, will wait for 1700x benchmarks.
     
  9. cryohellinc

    cryohellinc Master Guru

    Messages:
    792
    Likes Received:
    27
    GPU:
    1080Ti SeaHawkX@2k+PG348Q
    Well that looks great! I cant wait to see some actual benchmarks of top 8core models.

    EL1TE
    Salute to a fellow Sea Hawk user. :)

    What clock you run it at if i may ask?
     
  10. EL1TE

    EL1TE Master Guru

    Messages:
    261
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    MSI Sea Hawk GTX 1080 X
    I don't use overclock atm, didn't feel the need for it, i only play MMOs atm. :)
     

  11. Extraordinary

    Extraordinary Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    17,969
    Likes Received:
    100
    GPU:
    GTX980 SLI
    FX-8350 @ 4.8GHz

    [​IMG]
     
  12. gianluca

    gianluca Member

    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Sapphire Nitro+ RX480 OC
    my result
    FX8320E with 3.5 GHz base frequency and 4.0 turbo (stock is 3.2/4.0)

    1049 single thread
    6565 multi thread
     
  13. cryohellinc

    cryohellinc Master Guru

    Messages:
    792
    Likes Received:
    27
    GPU:
    1080Ti SeaHawkX@2k+PG348Q
    I see! Mine runs with slight overclock at 2100mhz, wonder if we will see a Sea Hawk TI version coming out.
     
  14. Odellot

    Odellot Master Guru

    Messages:
    661
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    MSI 1080TI SLI PG348Q
    Woah...IPC of Ryzen is good..Might switched Our Family PC with 7700K to Ryzen for an All AMD Build..:D

    For Comparison..

    Here's my Main Rig with 6950x @ 4.5ghz:

    [​IMG]

    Our Family PC 7700K @ 5.0ghz :

    [​IMG]
     
  15. -Tj-

    -Tj- Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    13,873
    Likes Received:
    9
    GPU:
    ZOTAC GX980Ti Amp!Extreme
    And ram speeds too, depends what they used, probably 2400mhz which is slower then ddr3 2400mhz :D



    I get ST 2160, MT ~9350 @ 4.7ghz, ram 2400mhz.


    Nice math work, yeah that looks logical. Although ram speeds matter a bit, but still overall seems to be spot on.







    Overall really impressed by its ST, now if all OC to at least 4.5 - 4.7Ghz, then its a win win for AMD.:nerd:
     

  16. Gromuhl'Djun

    Gromuhl'Djun Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    5,409
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    1080ti
    True.

    Though letting go of the current outdated legacy architecture would be a good thing in the long run. PC CPU's and software are so horribly inefficient because of all the legacy support and abstraction layers of the software running on it. Itanium would have rid us of that partly, but had too many caveats.
     
  17. Jagman

    Jagman Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,946
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    8GB RX480 Red Devil
    @Tj - Your maths look OK to me.

    WOW! AMD is back! Big time. Anyone checked Intels share price?

    My 4690K @ 4.2GHz scores 1900 (12 points more but it needs 500MHz more than the Ryzen @ 3.7GHz)

    Estimated then a Ryzen @4.2GHz scores 2143 :banana:
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2017
  18. zer0_c0ol

    zer0_c0ol Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,978
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    FuryX cf
    People are arguing that this is not the 1600x but the 1500 because of the 65 W tdp
     
  19. warlord

    warlord Master Guru

    Messages:
    693
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    R9 390X MSI(1080/1500)
    They are seeing things, maybe drunk and high fanboys? lmao
     
  20. zer0_c0ol

    zer0_c0ol Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,978
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    FuryX cf
    Dunno, there is a huge discussion because of it over @ Andantech forum
     

Share This Page