Discussion in 'Videocards - AMD Radeon Drivers Section' started by spectatorx, Jul 15, 2016.
nice card ! i have a wall at 1140 :bang:
Yeah... Nanos are best when they get enough power and are water cooled. Fury X is very good too but consumes more power and is more expensive. I got my card only 399€ in Finland. Now one store is selling it only 349€
Well my R9 290X just got delivered from RMA and well a nice surprise, I think, it was a 390 not a 390X but anyhow here is my scores from Xfired with my R9 290
hmm apparently imgur changed something and I cannot remember the correct formatting for them to display a picture.
Links to my results with just the R9 290
Now I just need to run the R9 390 alone.
Ok card unlocked to 3840sp : http://www.3dmark.com/spy/123111
i'll try 4096 later and repost .
Not bad. My scores are still too low. In firestrike Intel motherboards got 300-500 more scores. I dont know how is that possible. Is my PCI-E too slow? I have only 2.0.
My updated result. Not much gain on GPU OC.
There was some minor issues happening. So I made little tweaks to clocks and power limit. I think its now same as Fury X gets at same clocks?
Best I could do was 5440 on the GPU Score on my Fury...OC to 1210 on the core.