3dmark TimeSpy scores

nice card ! i have a wall at 1140 :bang:

 

Yeah... Nanos are best when they get enough power and are water cooled. Fury X is very good too but consumes more power and is more expensive. I got my card only 399€ in Finland. Now one store is selling it only 349€

 

Well my R9 290X just got delivered from RMA and well a nice surprise, I think, it was a 390 not a 390X but anyhow here is my scores from Xfired with my R9 290

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/112073
hmm apparently imgur changed something and I cannot remember the correct formatting for them to display a picture.

Links to my results with just the R9 290
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/16578

Now I just need to run the R9 390 alone.

 

Ok card unlocked to 3840sp : http://www.3dmark.com/spy/123111

i'll try 4096 later and repost .

 

Not bad. My scores are still too low. In firestrike Intel motherboards got 300-500 more scores. I dont know how is that possible. Is my PCI-E too slow? I have only 2.0.

 

My updated result. Not much gain on GPU OC.
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13523011?

 

There was some minor issues happening. So I made little tweaks to clocks and power limit. I think its now same as Fury X gets at same clocks?

GPU 5490
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13570733

 

Best I could do was 5440 on the GPU Score on my Fury...OC to 1210 on the core.

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/73642