3DMark Time Spy released

Discussion in 'Benchmark Mayhem' started by TDurden, Jul 14, 2016.

  1. Redemption80

    Redemption80 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    18,532
    Likes Received:
    274
    GPU:
    GALAX 970/ASUS 970
    I'm not going to pretend to full understand the technical side, while also not wanting to parrot what I have brought up in the other thread, but what sort of major gains would people be seeing?

    A rough % and an example of a game/benchmark that gets this sort of performance increase with async enabled.

    Looking at scores from AMD hardware, this implementation of async compute is the fastest so far.

    Why are people complaining?
     
    Last edited: Jul 17, 2016
  2. Fox2232

    Fox2232 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    11,337
    Likes Received:
    3,095
    GPU:
    5700XT+AW@240Hz
    I would not worry about Maxwell and its async capabilities. nVidia may enable it once they are completely EOL and people would look at their performance/watt or performance/$ as so bad that they would not have resale value.

    They may as well enable Async compute on GeForce 8800 GTX which for today's standard is actually just space heater.

    What I mean by that is that enabling performance increasing feature at time people no longer care about given HW is pointless. So nVidia should act soon. I do not even remember how long it is since they promised that magical driver enablement.
     
  3. nizzen

    nizzen Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,231
    Likes Received:
    310
    GPU:
    3x2080ti/5700x/1060
    Maxwell Overclock 40-50%, so it does not need Async shaders :p

    Did a run with 2x 1080 gaming x with HB Bridge:

    http://www.3dmark.com/spy/32439

    13 187 with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080(2x) and Intel Core i7-6900K
    Graphics Score 13 955
    CPU Score 10 055
     
    Last edited: Jul 17, 2016
  4. Redemption80

    Redemption80 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    18,532
    Likes Received:
    274
    GPU:
    GALAX 970/ASUS 970
    I have August in my head, so thinking it must be getting close to a year.

    If they couldn't do it when Maxwell was their top card, the incentive must be pretty much gone now.

    nizzen, surely another 10% on top of that would be even better?
    Saying that, I would rather get 10% more performance from an overclock than from something like async compute.

    Edit: BTW, I'm using 10% as its the average for async, not what can be achieved with an oc.
     

  5. kx11

    kx11 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,320
    Likes Received:
    405
    GPU:
    RTX 3090
    still no challengers ?

    meh :(
     
  6. warrior-kid

    warrior-kid Member

    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    3090 RTX+Titan RTX
    10896 at default settings.

    GPU's with mild overclock +171, memory +34, core voltage +5, 84C max temperature allowed. CPU all cores at 4.0 GHz.
     
  7. chinobino

    chinobino Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,078
    Likes Received:
    43
    GPU:
    GTX980Ti Lightning
  8. Odellot

    Odellot Master Guru

    Messages:
    704
    Likes Received:
    59
    GPU:
    TUF RTX 3090 XG438Q
    I lost about 200 points in total score and 1000 points in CPU Score..Damn 6950x's are beasts..

    TimeSpy Result:

    [​IMG]
     
  9. udam_u

    udam_u Member

    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Sapphire Fury X
    Futuremark released official statement regarding AC implementation in Time Spy.
    Very interesting reading for people wanting to know what is going on under the hood.
    The reading shows that despite the fact DX12 allows programmers for more control, drivers are still crucial -> please look at GTX970 example. We can now stop blaming developers for AC implementation in games causing lower performance on Maxwell GPU's (eg. Ashes of the Singularity). :)

    http://www.futuremark.com/pressrele...ime-spy?_ga=1.136205553.1110393204.1468547815
     
  10. Corbus

    Corbus Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,446
    Likes Received:
    60
    GPU:
    Reference 6900 XT
    Haha, nice , there should be a steam achievement for benching under 5 fps i think. XD
     

  11. pharma

    pharma Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,637
    Likes Received:
    465
    GPU:
    Asus Strix GTX 1080
  12. Odellot

    Odellot Master Guru

    Messages:
    704
    Likes Received:
    59
    GPU:
    TUF RTX 3090 XG438Q
    Retested using 368.95 Hotfix Drivers..

    [​IMG]
     
  13. DStealth

    DStealth Master Guru

    Messages:
    322
    Likes Received:
    27
    GPU:
    MSI GX 1080Ti@2088/12000
    Have you seen any improvement, just retested with my 1070 and the result seems marginally the same.
    [​IMG]
     
  14. warrior-kid

    warrior-kid Member

    Messages:
    40
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    3090 RTX+Titan RTX
    Got myself on the chart with 11112 with slightly more overclocking.
     
  15. CPC_RedDawn

    CPC_RedDawn Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    8,366
    Likes Received:
    758
    GPU:
    6800XT Nitro+ SE
    Got 6284 on my single GTX1070 at +120 core +500 memory but had to back off the overclock as I could see artifacts in the benchmark even though it passed.

    Settled for +100 core/+600 memory (i thought initially memory was the issue but it was the core causing the issue).

    This gets me 6260 so not much of a loss in performance.

    What voltage settings are you guys running for your overclocks on the new pascal cards?
     

  16. DStealth

    DStealth Master Guru

    Messages:
    322
    Likes Received:
    27
    GPU:
    MSI GX 1080Ti@2088/12000
    The answer is similar as to ask Chuck Norris - "How many push-ups can you do " :)
     
  17. kx11

    kx11 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,320
    Likes Received:
    405
    GPU:
    RTX 3090
    no kidding , they are insane , also requiers tons of voltage if you're going higher than 4.3ghz , i think 4.4ghz needs 1.4v
     
  18. CPC_RedDawn

    CPC_RedDawn Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    8,366
    Likes Received:
    758
    GPU:
    6800XT Nitro+ SE
    Is this a response to my question about how much voltage you guys are running?

    I have it currently at 100% but this is because I have my GTX1070 under water cooling and get no higher than 47C on the GPU.

    Is this kinda like Chuck Norris doesn't walk on land, he swims through it?
     
  19. ToyTen

    ToyTen Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,218
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    MSI 1080 Gaming X
    Last edited: Jul 24, 2016
  20. Solfaur

    Solfaur Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    7,440
    Likes Received:
    913
    GPU:
    MSI GTX 1080Ti Ga.X
    My best Time Spy so far:

    http://www.3dmark.com/spy/141742

    [​IMG]

    Funny enough, Time Spy is way more OC friendly then Fire Strike for me. I can't get away with anything above +85 on core there.
     

Share This Page