3DMark Time Spy released

Discussion in 'Benchmark Mayhem' started by TDurden, Jul 14, 2016.

  1. Corbus

    Corbus Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,422
    Likes Received:
    56
    GPU:
    1080 Strix OC
    Nice one , you're 8th now XD, try overclocking your VRAM , and Ram, i overclocked mine from 2400 to 3000mhz and it got me some more points on the CPU score.

    Although i don't seem to figure out why some people with the same CPU and overclocked 100mhz less than me score 200-300 points higher in CPU test. I doubt it's because of the ram(saw they use 3200mhz+).
    Even tried messing with voltage some more in case it wasn't 100% stable but no change.
    http://www.3dmark.com/spy/35075
     
  2. Undying

    Undying Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    14,167
    Likes Received:
    3,353
    GPU:
    Aorus RX580 XTR 8GB
    As you can see 280/280X perform similiar at the same clocks. Difference is within 5%.

    We gonna need an upgrade man. ;)
     
  3. MainFrame Alpha

    MainFrame Alpha Member Guru

    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    Strix GTX 980 TI
    maybe something running at the back ground
    try running gaming booster from
    GPU tweak II it gave me extra 150 points :nerd:
     
  4. TJccBR

    TJccBR New Member

    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    SAPPHIRE R9 290 Tri-X 4GB
    But the question is: why the Fury X is below the Titan X?
     

  5. Finisterre

    Finisterre Member

    Messages:
    28
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    NV
    These benchmarks just derailed the AMD 'Async compute' hype train.
    No worries for the GTX1060 that is supposed to be left in the dust by the :peeright: RX480 :peeleft: according to some.
     
  6. Hilbert Hagedoorn

    Hilbert Hagedoorn Don Vito Corleone Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,481
    Likes Received:
    8,126
    GPU:
    AMD | NVIDIA
    Oh .. I never even noticed that. It is a sorting mistake that was made in the hurry to out the benchmarks yesterday evening. Fixing.
     
  7. Redemption80

    Redemption80 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    18,529
    Likes Received:
    265
    GPU:
    GALAX 970/ASUS 970
    It hasn't really, AMD cards still getting nice performance boosts with async enabled, and still more than Pascal.


    Think this benchie pretty much ends the async on Maxwell question as well.

    Not that im complaining about performance in this, if games were like this then I would've alot less cynical abit DX12 and Vulkan.
     
  8. gringopig

    gringopig Master Guru

    Messages:
    213
    Likes Received:
    5
    GPU:
    EVGA 980Ti SC
    It is at 4.2GHz indeed.

    [​IMG]

    I can't explain the difference tbh, on paper they should be the same.
     
  9. MainFrame Alpha

    MainFrame Alpha Member Guru

    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    Strix GTX 980 TI
    Guess i found my first Time spy bug, been trying to run time spy on my brand new ASUS ROG GL552VW, score is.....302!!!..
    :3eyes:
    not kidding:bang:
    did not expect much but this is just sad, knowing my score with fire strike is around 4090 marks! again not much
    found out time spy is only loading with the integrated intel 530
    contacted future mark support hope they'll have a fix soon.
     
  10. Undying

    Undying Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    14,167
    Likes Received:
    3,353
    GPU:
    Aorus RX580 XTR 8GB
    Its running on a igpu for some reason. I would not expect much from GL552VW and 960m tho.

    If im not mistaken, i've seen someone here running this on a laptop, 980m it worked fine.
     

  11. newls1

    newls1 Member Guru

    Messages:
    167
    Likes Received:
    9
    GPU:
    Titan XP (2017)
  12. holler

    holler Master Guru

    Messages:
    221
    Likes Received:
    40
    GPU:
    2x AMD Radeon VII
  13. MainFrame Alpha

    MainFrame Alpha Member Guru

    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    Strix GTX 980 TI
    i know it's running on the IGPU and seems i'm not the only one on the future mark forums with this problem.
    was not expecting mush from the 960M to start with..but the erge to bench marks:nerd:...still...was expecting score like 1500 .. a score of 302 is waaay to low.
     
  14. Redemption80

    Redemption80 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    18,529
    Likes Received:
    265
    GPU:
    GALAX 970/ASUS 970
    So what sort of scaling are people getting in multi GPU, saw someone claiming CF was not working, while my brother in law only getting around 75% with 2x980ti.

    My performance pretty much doubled though, which is a first with this system, so hoping it wasn't an anomaly.
     
    Last edited: Jul 15, 2016
  15. Odellot

    Odellot Master Guru

    Messages:
    704
    Likes Received:
    55
    GPU:
    TUF RTX 3090 XG438Q
    I have good Scaling with my 2 x 1080..:D

    [​IMG]
     

  16. Redemption80

    Redemption80 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    18,529
    Likes Received:
    265
    GPU:
    GALAX 970/ASUS 970
    Yeah, doesn't half.

    Whats your single GPU score?
     
  17. newls1

    newls1 Member Guru

    Messages:
    167
    Likes Received:
    9
    GPU:
    Titan XP (2017)
  18. Bardock

    Bardock Guest

    Hello everyone, I have a problem. The Demo and two GPU tests works normally, but when I reach the CPU test, it instantly CTD with a "stopped working" message.

    In the end I get a valid GPU score, but my total and CPU score remains at 0! Does anyone have any idea why is this happening?
    http ://i.imgur.com/6ohGLMi.jpg

    PS: i tried both 32 and 64 bit versions. (and not able to post links before i reach 10 posts, so just delete space between http and : )
     
  19. Undying

    Undying Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    14,167
    Likes Received:
    3,353
    GPU:
    Aorus RX580 XTR 8GB
    Lacking SSE support on Phenom CPU?
     
  20. kx11

    kx11 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,259
    Likes Received:
    332
    GPU:
    RTX 3090
    13656

    [​IMG]
     

Share This Page