3DMark Time Spy - DirectX 12 trailer and screenshots

Nice scores and nice scaling! I'm obviously talking about when both companies cover all market segments. Until Vega is out, NVIDIA will charge whatever they want for the 1080. I don't believe that's the case for the 1060 any more though.

 

290 at 1040/1350

Spoiler

 

My best run so far, Pascal seems clearly unreachable for Maxwell on DX12.
1070 are a clear step ahead compared to 980-Ti.

I don't think i can do much more than this with my 980-Ti. Not sure there's even a point trying to anyway ...

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/18594

Spoiler

 

MSi GTX 1070 X / 4790K

1st run:

Score: 6098
GPU: 6395
CPU: 4828

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13212759

Core: 2088
Memory: 9154
CPU: stock

 

GTX1060 would need to at least sit between GTX980 and 390x to look interesting if this benchmark is what's going to be used moving forward.

Talking about charging what "they" want, I just noticed ocuk price for i7 6700k has jumped up by £60! From £270 to £330!!! Ridiculous prices here in UK now.

 

SCORE
5 263 with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M(2x) and Intel Core i7-4710MQ
Graphics Score 5 680

CPU Score 3 719

 

Here is just my powercolor R9 290 Turboduo clocked at 1050 core and 1350 memory.

The first one is with Async off:
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/18437 It gives an error since to run it with async off is a custom run.

With Async on:
http://www.3dmark.com/spy/16578

Everything else remained the same including back ground programs and services.

/edit hmm i just noticed that it is reporting my max turbo clock at 4297 on the async off run.

 

haha i think in need a RX480
514 with AMD Radeon R7(1x) and AMD A8-7600
Graphics Score 459 CPU Score 1 622

AMD A8-7600 3,100 MHz
Maximum turbo clock 3,692 MHz
28 nm 65 W

AMD Radeon R7 iGPU 384 core count
Memory 2,048 MB Core clock 720 MHz Memory bus clock 1,066 MHz
Driver version 16.150.2211.0

Windows 10 64-bit (10.0.10586)
ASRock A88M-G/3.1
Corsair DDR3 8,192 MB @ 2,128 MHz
120 GB TEAM L5 SSD

 

i think CFX is broken low skor with 2 cards

5820k @ 4.0
2x290 1050/1250

 

Yeah, I was pretty much getting 100% scaling if you scroll up.
I actually didn't think the scaling was that great at first as i was looking at the overall score, but then looked at the graphics score and fps results when I was posting the images.

Wish Quantum Break supported MGPU lol.

If this was the norm in DX12 games then it would certainly make something like 2x480 or 1060 a tempting buy.

Anyone got any CF 480 results that can be compared to a 1080?

 

So here are my results:

fotos hochladen

Not bad for my 980M

Still can't wait for zen (hope it doesn't disappoint).Or go Intel again with a new system build

 

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/18985

Here is one I dug up.

 

Cheers, looks like it does beat a 1080.

 

If the developers are neutral then you will see results like these mostly unless you are comparing broken AMD evolve DX12 games.

 

As Heisenberg says:"You're God damn right".

Interesting synthetic benchmark,still wait for a revision.Do not forget the real game results matter.

"The GeForce GTX 1080 sees a 6.84% jump in performance with asynchronous compute enabled versus having it turned off. The gap for the GTX 1070 is 5.42%. The scaling is less than we saw on both Fiji and Polaris from AMD, which again indicates that AMD has engineered GCN around asynchronous compute more than NVIDIA has with Pascal."

 

Still taking tiny percentage increases though, and a game that still has no benchmark so everyone makes up their own testing.

I have noticed that the newer the Nvidia card, the higher the increase, while the RX480 does not seem to benefit as much as older AMD hardware.

 

This is it, i'm done trying more. Pretty happy with the result anyway:

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/28004

Spoiler

I'm gonna try some explicit DX12 mGPU now, and report back :nerd:
Wonder if i can have this 570 i have, running with my 980-Ti hehe...

 

Async ON vs OFF

http://www.3dmark.com/compare/spy/28542/spy/28442

Default

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/14604

 

On the 3 rigs in my house that can run DX12:

GPU: MSi GTX1070 Gaming X (2088/9186)
CPU: i7 4790K (4.7Ghz)
Score: 6119
GPU: 6341
CPU: 5108

GPU: MSi GTX 970 Gaming (stock)
CPU: i7 2600K (stock)
Score: 3472
GPU: 3495
CPU: 3350


GPU: EVGA 780Ti SC (stock)
CPU: i7 860 (stock)
Score: 3015
GPU: 3164
CPU: 2384

 

7354 score in my system.

7913 graphics (GTX 1080@2114MHz)
5252 CPU (i7 4790K@4798MHz)

http://www.3dmark.com/spy/17803