3DMark series in low/medium GPU usages to 100%

Discussion in 'Benchmark Mayhem' started by ricardonuno1980, Mar 17, 2012.

  1. ricardonuno1980

    ricardonuno1980 Banned

    Messages:
    4,409
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX 780Ti Classified :D
    @guys: Why you can't comment here nor calculate to performance simulated? :confused:
     
  2. ricardonuno1980

    ricardonuno1980 Banned

    Messages:
    4,409
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX 780Ti Classified :D
    3DMark 05 at default
    GPU usages in % on GTX 480 running AMD X6 1055T@stock - same both OS and GeForce driver-HQ see my 1st post.


    GT1: ~70 fps* - duration test: 103s (405MHz-core/1848MHz-mem: 6s; 405MHz-core/324MHz-mem: 62s)
    20+20+19+19+20+20+20+19+16+15+15+15+15+16+17+16+17+16+16+17+20+19+19+20+19+19+16+16+19+18+18+(29+29+30+31+30+28)+((42+41+39+37+38+37+37+38+38+35+35+37+43+42+44+44+39+36+35+32+32+46+45+42+31+30+29+33+ 36+38+41+42+43+53+56+52+45+42+39+39+39+40+42+42+44+43+50+50+50+49+48+47+46+46+45+44+46+48+51+52+56+62))+29+29+29
    AVG: 17.9% -> 100% = ~391 fps simulated (25.1 fps on my old 6800 Ultra OC edition-425MHz core **)

    GT2: ~61 fps* - duration test: 62s (405/1848: 7s; 405/324: 1s)
    31+29+30+29+29+29+29+29+28+28+24+24+24+24+24+24+24+24+24+24+26+26+26+26+25+25+25+25+25+25+24+24+24+(42+42+37+36+36+37+51)+((69))+29+29+29+28+26+25+25+26+26+26+26+27+27+27+27+28+27+28+29+29+31
    AVG: 26.8% -> 100% = ~228 fps simulated (16.8 fps on my old 6800 Ultra OC edition-425MHz core **)

    GT3: ~162 fps* - duration test: 76s
    40+46+46+45+46+45+46+45+39+38+38+38+38+33+33+33+34+38+43+43+43+43+42+40+39+39+40+39+52+41+30+46+65+ 42+65+20+19+44+47+56+59+88+99+98+99+23+27+59+58+58+53+38+37+37+37+37+36+56+45+47+50+32+37+32+18+17+ 16+18+17+40+40+36+34+34+32+18
    AVG: 42.4% -> 100% = ~382 fps simulated (28.4 fps on my old 6800 Ultra OC edition-425MHz core **)


    Total score: ~21,900* 3DMarks at 29.0% avg -> 100%: ~75,500 (5,715 on my old 6800 Ultra OC edition-425MHz core **)

    * - Sorry, I can't remember this my score "real" correct because I quited bad 3DMark05. ;)

    ** - Pentium D 820@stock

    Performance adaptive levels on GTX 480:
    405core/1848mem = (...+...)
    405core/324mem = ((...+...))
     
    Last edited: Apr 18, 2012
  3. Lane

    Lane Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    6,358
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    2x HD7970 - EK Waterblock
    does really Nvidia card have so low gpu usage ?
     
  4. ricardonuno1980

    ricardonuno1980 Banned

    Messages:
    4,409
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX 780Ti Classified :D
    Yes but the "calculator" of simulator helps to solve full-performance of videocard for avoid CPU bottlenecked.
    Can you understand well my tutorial (see on bottom of my post #15)? :)

    NOTE: Sorry for bad english. ;)
     

  5. ricardonuno1980

    ricardonuno1980 Banned

    Messages:
    4,409
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX 780Ti Classified :D
    Unfortunately, no any comment yet. :confused: But this thread is very important!!
     
  6. ricardonuno1980

    ricardonuno1980 Banned

    Messages:
    4,409
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX 780Ti Classified :D
    You can't post yet because you write (by keyboard - not copy nor paste) very hardly the copy of GPU usages benchmarked. Do you agree that?
     
  7. ricardonuno1980

    ricardonuno1980 Banned

    Messages:
    4,409
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX 780Ti Classified :D
    3DMark 2001SE at default
    GPU usages in % on GTX 480 running AMD X6 1055T@stock with same OS and same geforce driver (Q)


    ATTENTION: 2 GPU usages updated per second - we don't forget that.

    GT4 - Nature: 725.5 fps - begin clock: 14:11:53; end clock: 14:12:44 (103 times updated)
    61+62+63+64+65+65+65+64+62+61+61+60+60+59+59+58+59+55+54+54+54+53+52+52+50+48+47+46+45+43+42+41+43+ 45+54+53+53+52+52+51+51+39+40+40+40+40+40+40+40+41+44+43+61+65+66+67+68+69+71+70+70+68+70+71+71+71 +71+71+70+69+68+65+65+64+63+61+61+58+59+58+57+54 +55+55+54+54+54+55+56+56+58+56+56+57+57+56+57+58 +59+61+62+62+61
    AVG: 56.9% -> 100% = ~1275 fps simulated :) (~188 fps on my old 6800Ultra@425MHz core-version*, 448.4 fps on my old 8800GTS 640** and 434.7 fps on my old 9800GT 1GB***)

    * - Pentium D 820@stock
    ** - C2D E6600@stock
    *** - C2D E6600@3.0 GHz
     
    Last edited: Apr 19, 2012
  8. cowie

    cowie Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    12,807
    Likes Received:
    8
    GPU:
    GTX
    When it comes 03 it sucks that a overclocked 680 does not even score as much as a 448 ti card...its because of the lack of gpu useage during that bench.
    1 reason i sent a 680 back to newegg(no stock so they gave me refund)
    I'll put up some tests myself soon
     
  9. Lane

    Lane Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    6,358
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    2x HD7970 - EK Waterblock
    Yep a time will come we will need 6.5ghz CPU for dont be bottlnecked on 05-03.
     
  10. ricardonuno1980

    ricardonuno1980 Banned

    Messages:
    4,409
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX 780Ti Classified :D
    You don't need too OC for CPU because you may get extremely hard for CPU OCed to remove "bottleneck" but you should calculate from performance real to simulated.

    By examples: GTX 480@stock running
    min 5% GPU usage at GT1 (3DMark 03) - AMD X6 1055T@stock (2.8 GHz)
    min ~9% " - i7 2600K@stock (3.4 GHz)
    min ~95-100% " - AMD X6 1055T@56-60 GHz or 2600K@35-40 GHz or modern/long future CPU

    Can you understand well? :)
     
    Last edited: Jun 21, 2012

  11. ricardonuno1980

    ricardonuno1980 Banned

    Messages:
    4,409
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX 780Ti Classified :D
    I will try test with new i5 2500K in next week but I keep XP except 3DMark Vantage because this OS is recommended... :)
     
  12. ricardonuno1980

    ricardonuno1980 Banned

    Messages:
    4,409
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX 780Ti Classified :D
  13. ricardonuno1980

    ricardonuno1980 Banned

    Messages:
    4,409
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX 780Ti Classified :D
    3DMark 03: I got 737.0 fps (GT4: Mother Nature) running XP x86 SP3 and GFX 306.23WHQL (HQ) driver with new CPU. It's weird and incredible!! :eek: :bugeye: WTF?!!! Because the performance simulated (~715 fps) is failed. But I'm very happy for GTX 480!! :D
     
  14. ricardonuno1980

    ricardonuno1980 Banned

    Messages:
    4,409
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX 780Ti Classified :D
    Now it's easier to copy GPU usages :):
    1. run new "eVGA Precision X" and click configuration icon (look on right-up of window)
    2. click tab "monitoring", change preferrely time updated (in ms - miliseconds) and check "Log history to file" -> click button "OK"
    3. run benchmark program (eg: 3DMark series)
    4. after benchmark ended, run Microsoft Excel and open "HardwareMonitoring.hml" in paste "C:\Program Files (x86)\EVGA Precision X\" (for Win Vista x64 or 7 x64) or "C:\Program Files\EVGA Precision X\" (for Win XP x86) - (do NOT click configuration icon due to file cleared)
    5. calculate average GPU usage (all GPU usages tested) and performance simulated. Good luck! :)



    3DMark 03: - running Win XP x86 SP3 - i5-2500K@stock w/ Turbo Boost and GTX 480@stock w/ 306.23WHQL (HQ)

    GT1: ~1190 fps
    AVG: 40.9% -> 100% = ~2910 fps simulated

    GT2: ~754 fps
    AVG: 87.0% -> 100% = ~867 fps simulated

    GT3: ~627 fps
    AVG: 80.7% -> 100% = ~777 fps simulated

    GT4: ~738 fps :eek: :D
    AVG: 98.3% -> 100% = ~751 fps simulated

    94,600 3DMarks - 76.7% AVG overall -> 123,300 3DMarks simulated
     
    Last edited: Sep 21, 2012
  15. ricardonuno1980

    ricardonuno1980 Banned

    Messages:
    4,409
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX 780Ti Classified :D
    i5-2500K@4.33GHz (OC Tune) and running XP x86 SP3 with GTX 480@stock (306.23WHQL-HQ)

    3DMark 03 - GT4: 748.4 fps (close to performance simulated (~751 fps))!!!
    3DMark 06 - HDR/SM3.0 HDR1-Canyon Flight: 161.566 fps (superior than performance simulated (~156 fps)?!!)

    My performances are amazing and excellent surprised! :eek2: wowww! wtf?! :D
     

Share This Page