3D Mark 2013 FireStrike and TimeSpy Guru3D Records

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1309230


New scores with a mild oc.

 

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1330187

Not to happy with the physics score and feeling that the CPU is holding the GPU back abit. My spidy senses are sensing a haswell coming my way.

 

haswell will do you justice we have almost the same graphics score
http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/225433

 

beat ya both with my old 2600k

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/753268

 

Please look at the Physics scores.

 

Yeah? point is? still beating on GPU score too

 

See bold, I interpreted the post as gurus talking about Physics and improving the Physics score. If your "beat ya both" was Physics score, it would have related to their post, and that was the point.

 

well you know 2600k is not a haswell chip

so don't get why you made that connection

I said beat both ya as in overall score :3eyes:

browsing through thread not many have breached 16k GPU score

 

Connection is

TK graphics score =14,362
Steppzor graphics score = 14,417
I agree with TK graphics scores are almost the same.

TK Physics score =13,091
Steppzor Physics score = 9,354
k3vst3r Physics score = 12,342
TK link his 3DMARK to show Physics scores with 2600K. Yes, we know 2600K iis not haswell, but it is a given that Physics scores will be higher with haswell.
When I saw your post, I misread you for supporting TK. I believed your post was regarding improved physics by linking to a higher Physics score on your 2600K,
we know it is not haswell but understanding haswell is better.
So, that was the reason for the connection.
Very nice 3DMARK on your old 2600K.
You have haswell in you specs, how much improvement did you get from the upgrade?

 

few hundred points here an there problem is my 2600k did 5.1 an this haswell will only do 4.7 max without crazy insane voltages which will nuke chip in minutes

 

how much do you need for 4.6Ghz?

 

Posts like these are why I do not post here too often nowadays.

 

1.35v ish

4.7 requires around 1.45v

4.8 went high as 1.5v still wasn't stable

played with cpu input voltage went from 1.65 all way to 1.9v

competitive spirit? where's it gone :thumbup:

 

I`m more old school, I just post the links and let them do the talking. I posted my link in this thread a long time ago, I reposted it to show a cpu/mb upgrade will be very helpful in getting his firestrike score higher than it is now. I thought that was self evident? I will try to be more clearer in the future as not to confuse some of the members in this thread

 

Fair do's then :thumbup:

 

Okay Steambox/livingroom rig update replaced the 6950/70 with a 770 lightning this is a overclock with no voltage increase http://www.3dmark.com/fs/937483

I will go for more at a later time but that's all for now. 1306/7600

 

Yeah that is toasty, I need 1.233v for 4.6ghz.

btw leave Vccin aka input voltage at ~ 1.80v, apparently higher input means less cpu voltage, but i didnt see this trend.

 

660ti sli and FX8350 @4.4

Fire strike Extreme 4880

GPU 5503
Physics 8556
Combined 1958

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/951428


Fire strike 8795

GPU 11927
Physics 8586
Combined 2999

http://www.3dmark.com/fs/951443

Not overclocked my cards for a while thought I would overclock a little for fun. Don't need them overclocked for every day use as they run everything great at Stock @1080p

 

Sli 780's 3770k @4.6
Classy 780 on stock cooler/DCII on AXIII an the arcitc cooler runs -18c less at the same 1.3v.
That's all fine but the classy runs faster anyway

 

AMD 1100T@3,87Ghz has a score almost like FX8350@4,4Ghz, weird

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/1115733