3D Mark 2013 FireStrike and TimeSpy Guru3D Records

Discussion in 'Benchmark Mayhem' started by Pill Monster, Feb 4, 2013.

  1. Pill Monster

    Pill Monster Banned

    Messages:
    25,216
    Likes Received:
    7
    GPU:
    7950 Vapor-X 1100/1500
    *yawn*

    [​IMG]
     
  2. neonneophyte

    neonneophyte Member

    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Sapphire 6950 2gb
    any particular reason you wont provide a link?
     
  3. Pill Monster

    Pill Monster Banned

    Messages:
    25,216
    Likes Received:
    7
    GPU:
    7950 Vapor-X 1100/1500
    Yes, there is a reason.
     
  4. neonneophyte

    neonneophyte Member

    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Sapphire 6950 2gb
    ill admit, im impressed you can clock that high. all the same though, im still not impressed with the cpu on the whole. like i said, it does ok in some things and terrible in others. which you know.

    my cpu does ok in some things and really well in others.

    i could go higher but id need to adjust my cooling a bit.
     
    Last edited: Feb 10, 2013

  5. Matt26LFC

    Matt26LFC Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,061
    Likes Received:
    19
    GPU:
    HD630 :(
    Guys heres my first run

    [​IMG]

    Not sure about them, do I need to run the 13.2 BETA 5 drivers? Looking at some other scores mine seem off for CF6950s
     
  6. Pill Monster

    Pill Monster Banned

    Messages:
    25,216
    Likes Received:
    7
    GPU:
    7950 Vapor-X 1100/1500
    You are a very poor loser.


    Nice run man...I'm using beta 5 atm they seem great :)
     
  7. Matt26LFC

    Matt26LFC Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,061
    Likes Received:
    19
    GPU:
    HD630 :(
    Cheers, I've just downloaded them, do I need to run a CAP with them do you know?
     
  8. Jonik

    Jonik Active Member

    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    MSI Lightning HD7970
    Core i7 3930K@ 5000Mhz
    MSI Lightning HD7970@ 1350/1960Mhz 13.2 beta5
    9335
    [​IMG]

    Core i7 3930K@ 5000Mhz
    MSI Lightning HD7970@ 1350/1950Mhz 13.2 beta5
    X4430
    [​IMG]

    Core i7 3930K@ 4500Mhz
    MSI Lightning HD7970 CF@ 1200/1700Mhz 13.2 beta5
    13385
    [​IMG]

    X7023
    [​IMG]
     
  9. Matt26LFC

    Matt26LFC Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,061
    Likes Received:
    19
    GPU:
    HD630 :(
    Ok re ran the benchmark with 13.2 BETA5 and what an Improvement in Fire Strike!

    [​IMG]

    Just need to get those 6950s OC'ed again ;)
     
  10. Pill Monster

    Pill Monster Banned

    Messages:
    25,216
    Likes Received:
    7
    GPU:
    7950 Vapor-X 1100/1500
    No the CAP is included from what I understand....
     

  11. Valerys

    Valerys Master Guru

    Messages:
    373
    Likes Received:
    12
    GPU:
    Gigabyte RTX2080S
    I am on his side, not that i have something against you but considering an 1100T scores 8500+ at 4Ghz i feel disappointed of the FX series.
     
  12. Pill Monster

    Pill Monster Banned

    Messages:
    25,216
    Likes Received:
    7
    GPU:
    7950 Vapor-X 1100/1500
    Still doesn't change the fact he is a poor loser.

    What bench did you get 8500?

    Yes I agree BD was meh but PD is an improvement. FWIW I also have a 955 @4.4Ghz and it's slower than my 8320.

    Btw I should add that I was happy with my 955 but someone offered to buy my old rig, I used that money to get this one.
     
    Last edited: Feb 10, 2013
  13. Valerys

    Valerys Master Guru

    Messages:
    373
    Likes Received:
    12
    GPU:
    Gigabyte RTX2080S
    Here http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/17739
    It's not my benchmark, I can't run the test yet on my PC, maybe tomorrow or the day after tomorrow.
    My 'problem' is that now i would pay for an 8320 slightly more than i did 2 years ago for 1100T with almost no performance increase (and serious regressions in some areas). I really expect after 2 years to get a better performing (by a moderate to large margine) product for the same money.
     
    Last edited: Feb 10, 2013
  14. MMXMMX

    MMXMMX Member Guru

    Messages:
    141
    Likes Received:
    12
    GPU:
    Gigabyte 2080 TI
    Must be a driver problem maiby nvidea wil bring us better drivers ?
     
  15. Pill Monster

    Pill Monster Banned

    Messages:
    25,216
    Likes Received:
    7
    GPU:
    7950 Vapor-X 1100/1500
    I think you're being a bit negative; the 8320/50 is faster than the X6 in every benchmark I've looked at. It's also twice as fast as my 955 when encoding.

    I can understand why you aren't impressed with PD after looking at your link, that is quite a nice score....

    If I hadn't sold my old rig I'd still have my 955 and prob woulda waited till Steamroller, (though 2014 is a long way away) I stuck with AMD partly because Intel mobo's are extremely expensive in NZ and also I can upgrade easily (Steamroller will likely use AM3+)...
     
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2013

  16. leeaids

    leeaids Active Member

    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Nvidia Gtx 690
  17. pcgamers

    pcgamers Master Guru

    Messages:
    308
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    2x GTX 1080Ti FE
    Last edited: Feb 11, 2013
  18. PhazeDelta1

    PhazeDelta1 Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    15,616
    Likes Received:
    13
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080 FTW
  19. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    22,112
    Likes Received:
    2
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    is it running at 6008 ram? just add +500 offset and run it again.
     
  20. PhazeDelta1

    PhazeDelta1 Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    15,616
    Likes Received:
    13
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080 FTW
    No. That was jsut a test run at 4.7GHz. It passed with out BSODing on me. SO I think my CPU is good to go now. I will work in upping the memory clocks in a bit.
     

Share This Page