Discussion in 'Videocards - NVIDIA GeForce Drivers Section' started by erm, Aug 13, 2014.
Were fine here also ........ 7zip. Maybe something at your end?
For comparison ran at same clocks (I will be clocking back up). I find less stutter with 337.94, they are smoother to me. Not all are susceptible to stutter.
I agree on the big images its ridiculous, pages where big images are very hard to read.
In extracted 340.65 folder go to display.driver folder and copy these 4 files
to 340.66 display.driver folder and overwrite.
Now install 340.66 like usually, gpu caps viewer will show openGL4.5 afterwards - but there it will show 340.65 next to it.
cheers mate worked a treat !!!
Winrar worked for me.
In religion, a prophet is an individual who is claimed to have been contacted by the supernatural or the divine, and to speak for them.
Sorry It is monitor dependent were the rez of the ones I posted too big for your monitor?
Not really possibly someone with 3 monitors at 1440x will see all pictures I think most other have to scroll to read all the text.
Little or no difference between 340.52 vs 340.66.
But I realize greater stability in frames.
2560x1600 but my Sammy is still 1080p 4K 5 years here we cum. You should try 24 fps film the 120 hz (soap opera) will never be where the boys r.
I got consistently lower score in valley (10~22pts) with this driver compare to 337.50, also there are some frame hitching in Assassins Creed 3 & Valley with this driver.
Rolled back to 337.50 then.
Played COD Ghosts yesterday and still occasional lag stutter.. Common will this ever be fixed?
60fps vsync - forced in driver, seems the smoothest but i get this 60-60-58.9-60-60-59.8-60-60 and its not great to watch..
I made one video, can upload later if its needed.
Manuel revealed on GeForce forums the next driver does improve lag/stutters.
Link please? I would search for the post myself, but Geforce forums is really lousy.
Ditto, That's been my deal also. I use v-sync and 337.91 has been only 1 that plays v-sync smooth, the 340.65 is better than the older 340's but its still not as good as 337.91, I'll keep a copy of 337.91 around for a while till they get it back. I haven't tried this quadro I figured it would be same as 340.65.
Thanks. At least there's something good to expect, while I await for my own problem to be fixed in a future driver.
I saw this photo before, hopefully it really fixes it.
btw this is how it looks like in COD ghosts
but really bad YT compression.. I recorded 60fps @ 16mbps