163.69 now whql

Discussion in 'Videocards - NVIDIA GeForce Drivers Section' started by John Dolan, Sep 18, 2007.

  1. John Dolan

    John Dolan Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,247
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    2x GTX 780 SLI
  2. Rich_Guy

    Rich_Guy Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    12,811
    Likes Received:
    778
    GPU:
    MSI 2070S X-Trio
    Yup for Vista, XP should be along soon, so looks like we wasted our times with the beta's if they gona be official about 2x days later. :D
     
  3. zodden

    zodden Guest

    Do they make changes to the WHQL that is not in the beta 163.69? I was under the assumption that they are the same or is that wrong?
     
  4. morfeus02

    morfeus02 Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,461
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GOOD
    i think that 4 the xp version they will fix incompatibility with nhancer


    anyway they do change some things, that's why they do beta's ;)
     

  5. zodden

    zodden Guest

    i hope they come soon I am about to rollback to 163.44 and it will be my luck that one hour later they will come out for XP. Its been a long time since I installed 3 video drivers in less then 24 hours :D
     
  6. knyz

    knyz Active Member

    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    650M / Crossfire 7970
    Beta and whql are similar ;)
     
  7. Zer0K3wL

    Zer0K3wL Banned

    Messages:
    3,073
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    gtx 480 850/1700/2000 h2o
    oke that was fast T_T
     
  8. eRa`

    eRa` Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,825
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    Palit GeForce GTX 570
    Beta: 57.441 KB
    WHQL: 57.456 KB
     
  9. kmufc77

    kmufc77 Master Guru

    Messages:
    562
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    6700XT XFX SWFT 309
    are these the same as the betas and just certificated for use now
     
  10. sam3000

    sam3000 Master Guru

    Messages:
    370
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    SLI GTX970
    no, same version number = same drivers. I've already installed the non-WHQL version so I'm not going to bother downloading and installing the signed version.
     

  11. MAD5

    MAD5 Member Guru

    Messages:
    192
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    SLI Titan EVGA / ASUS
    So, like with 163,67 and 163,69 I have nv4 disp BSOD, now with the whql will be the same?
     
  12. Maxx77

    Maxx77 Active Member

    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    nVidia GeForce GTX 285
    Yes MAD5, because you will have to underclock your RAM from PC2 8500 to PC2 6400@800mhz.

    I had to do that with my DDR2 8500 to avoid having your problem.

    You will not find other solution.

    Maxx77.
     
  13. dukedave5200

    dukedave5200 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,192
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    BFG GTX 285 OCX - SLI
    The driver file size is a little different, and the installation file sure is a lot smaller. Probably no differences in performance or whatever, but I will err on the side of caution and install the WHQL drivers even though I have these betas installed.

    That's just my preference though...
     
  14. Runing Target

    Runing Target Master Guru

    Messages:
    220
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Evga GTX 680 Hydro Copper
  15. Tantawi

    Tantawi Member Guru

    Messages:
    165
    Likes Received:
    20
    GPU:
    GeForce RTX3070
    I just installed them over the beta ones, no problems :)
     

  16. lambi42

    lambi42 Member Guru

    Messages:
    100
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    8800 gts 512 @ 740/1860/997
    When you compare whql and beta with ultra compare, you just see that Whql got nv_disp.cat and not the beta version. This is why the size is different.
     
  17. Mr_ALLroy

    Mr_ALLroy Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,997
    Likes Received:
    19
    GPU:
    EVGA RTX 3080 FTW3
    Exactly, the only difference between the beta version of these drivers and the WHQL ones, is the WHQL signature. In my experience, nothing else is changed in this case. Same drivers, one with a WHQL sig, and one without but same drivers.
     
  18. Francko1979

    Francko1979 Member

    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    EVGA GTX 980Ti SC SLI´ed
    No inverse telecine

    Hey Guys!


    I´m using Vista 64 Ultimate and just installed 163.69 betas.
    I noticed that on the control panel, i don´t have inverse telecine option!
    Donno why, uninstalled, used DC pro, CCleaner, installed all over again but still no luck.
    It´s like the option didn´t exist at all.
    Any idea if the new WHQL have it available? or what could be causin´ it?

    Thx in advanced.
     
  19. Rodman

    Rodman Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,721
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX285 SLI@756-1580-2750
    Is there a diff between the 2 in the release notes?
     
  20. TheHunter

    TheHunter Banned

    Messages:
    13,405
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    MSi N570GTX TFIII [OC|PE]
    I can't OC my gpu anymore with these on vista32bit an rivatuner, worked fine in beta (still shader clck was locked), but now with these even that is impossible, when i set the desired clock and save it, and also save run at startup but when i hit apply it goes back to default :rolleyes:. any suggestions?
     

Share This Page