163.69 now whql

Here are the official versions guys

• ForceWare 163.69 Vista 32-bit WHQL
• ForceWare 163.69 Vista 64-bit WHQL

 

Yup for Vista, XP should be along soon, so looks like we wasted our times with the beta's if they gona be official about 2x days later.

 

Do they make changes to the WHQL that is not in the beta 163.69? I was under the assumption that they are the same or is that wrong?

 

i think that 4 the xp version they will fix incompatibility with nhancer


anyway they do change some things, that's why they do beta's

 

i hope they come soon I am about to rollback to 163.44 and it will be my luck that one hour later they will come out for XP. Its been a long time since I installed 3 video drivers in less then 24 hours

 

Beta and whql are similar

 

oke that was fast T_T

 

Beta: 57.441 KB
WHQL: 57.456 KB

 

are these the same as the betas and just certificated for use now

 

no, same version number = same drivers. I've already installed the non-WHQL version so I'm not going to bother downloading and installing the signed version.

 

So, like with 163,67 and 163,69 I have nv4 disp BSOD, now with the whql will be the same?

 

Yes MAD5, because you will have to underclock your RAM from PC2 8500 to PC2 6400@800mhz.

I had to do that with my DDR2 8500 to avoid having your problem.

You will not find other solution.

Maxx77.

 

The driver file size is a little different, and the installation file sure is a lot smaller. Probably no differences in performance or whatever, but I will err on the side of caution and install the WHQL drivers even though I have these betas installed.

That's just my preference though...

 

WINDOWS VISTA 64 WHQL
http://www.nvidia.com/object/winvista_x64_163.69.html

 

I just installed them over the beta ones, no problems

 

When you compare whql and beta with ultra compare, you just see that Whql got nv_disp.cat and not the beta version. This is why the size is different.

 

Exactly, the only difference between the beta version of these drivers and the WHQL ones, is the WHQL signature. In my experience, nothing else is changed in this case. Same drivers, one with a WHQL sig, and one without but same drivers.

 

No inverse telecine

Hey Guys!


I´m using Vista 64 Ultimate and just installed 163.69 betas.
I noticed that on the control panel, i don´t have inverse telecine option!
Donno why, uninstalled, used DC pro, CCleaner, installed all over again but still no luck.
It´s like the option didn´t exist at all.
Any idea if the new WHQL have it available? or what could be causin´ it?

Thx in advanced.

 

Is there a diff between the 2 in the release notes?

 

I can't OC my gpu anymore with these on vista32bit an rivatuner, worked fine in beta (still shader clck was locked), but now with these even that is impossible, when i set the desired clock and save it, and also save run at startup but when i hit apply it goes back to default . any suggestions?