158.24 whql or 158.45, which is better for vista64?

Discussion in 'Videocards - NVIDIA GeForce Drivers Section' started by Straykatt, Jun 5, 2007.

  1. ntfx

    ntfx Guest

    thats bizarre man, I installed drivers and riva tuner on vista x64 no problem, every driver has installed a dream, same with any version of riva tuner i use.
    Like i said before, a lot of vista problems are the users being clueless not the actual OS.
     
  2. stefansg

    stefansg Master Guru

    Messages:
    375
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Point of View 8800GTX
    The .24 was faster than the .45 on my system according 3dmark06 and it works better too. And i also never used F8 key when using unsigned drivers.
     
  3. Jeremy

    Jeremy Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,063
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    -
    They boths suck but I am using .45 right now. It seems to be better for me although I randomly get errors saying my display had just recovered from an error and fixed itself.
     
  4. Zer0K3wL

    Zer0K3wL Banned

    Messages:
    3,073
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    gtx 480 850/1700/2000 h2o
    its funny now if installed windows vista ultimate 64 bit 1 week ago if not had 1 single comp lockup game lockup or tdr error etc whatever ;>
    anyway would say 158.45
    would't touch 32 bit to begin with the newer driver the more tdr errors for me atleast
     

Share This Page