yeahh, 98 s not ready for the battle, in crysis i saw artificts, in seme moments at open field, and drops a couple of fps in crysys benchamrk ,...
xfx would be my choice between those. I had an xfx 260gtx xxx and is rock solid, fresh and nice performance the xxx edition.
standard system is 620/1292/2160. Yes i use an standard cooling system, idle 43 full 70 degrees and msi give more oc yet not mauch than u can see...
Here my oc on 3dmark, no t bad, and i ll go fore more!
Here my 3dmark06
See ya guys!
I did som test with 3dmark06 and FEAR PEREUS MNDATE all stock cpu and VGA, the numbers were:
ned help plz!, i need some information to set up the new tweaked 154,53 xp 32bits forcware
first, i ve an 8800 ultra ...this forceware works with...
171.17 still better in gral by Alcon
with my ULTRA only 16367 pts in 3dmark06 with q6600@3,5ghz, not bad ahh!
see the diference between gtx and ultra
any body had another experience with 174 s drivers?
i get 16367 in 3dmark 2006!!
but he has an amd 6400+ and the score is lower tah an intel c2d or q6600, but 6700pts is to low,
tell me Rich Guy in your URL says that is whql, is different tahn gurus page or is the same foreware and is a mistake of the your URL?
jajaja yeah me too, nvidia fired some employers and recluit us to test your diferent drivers !!, we want our pay 50% now fifty at end of febrary!
the 177.23 is whql now?, a guy post it here tha yesterday the whql forecware re available, any body try this last drivers, because the .23 that...
in guru 3d download section dont mention that is whql, !, any body checked this driver??, is it better than 171.17?
i see that vga temp up 2 degress and cpu temps at the begening cores temps were a little warmer, but later this temps got to normal.I think that...
oh oh oh JESUS!, this drivers re soo good, crysis improve 3 more fps average, adn increased in 3dmark 06 in my q6600@355ghz and msi 8800 ultra oc...
Any body use this driver?? in nvidia page doesnt exist.
try to use the last whql drivers but not this one the 168.21 works fine