Nvidia Forceware 56.57

ya OpenGL wise... they're even "fasterer"

 

so how are these in performance and iq?

 

yes... numbers i love numbers. are they better then the last ones or worse? do they crash your games flickering things like that. interested in unreal engien performance since i play americas army hard core tweaked so that i get high fps. how well do they work? cause i like the 55.55 or was it 56.55 the whql ones that just were released...
thaks for the work guys it helps me decide if i want to risk crashing or not...
later
swizzy

 

do waste your time they were rewritten by this guy to support the Go series

I tried them and went from 47k to 33 k in aquamark=They prty much suck

 

well... benchmarks aren't the whole story, so... how's it in games?

 

I cannot get these drivers OFF my system fast enough. Played several games (Halo, Knights of the Old Republic...). Huge drop in Image Quality, looked like some pixel shader effects were not being properly rendered, lowered texture quality... In addition temp on my card raised by 2 or 3 degrees C.

 

Thankz bopper, but I think a 14000 point drop is a pretty good indication of the performance of the driver

 

guess i'm staying away from these

 

what program or tweak do you guys use to check the temp of the core of the gpu???? ive been trying to find one and am about to give up... well if you have any information for me please dont hesitate to post it ide love to know my temperature of my gpu. thank you,
swizz

 

For the rest of the people still reading that maybe thinking 'I know ill prove em wrong and download it for my self and put this driver on and see' DONT BOTHER!!!!!

These must be the worst drivers i have ever had the misfortune of putting on my PC (and hard to get off to)!

DONT DO IT ONE AND ALL! U HAVE BEEN WARNED....

 

These are definite fakes, the code is bit-to-bit identical with the 56.55 (and I mean code, not resources).

 

in terms of everything,seriously its fast.

in mohaa i get 100-106 fps with 44.67(betas) in a specific area
with 40.72 i get 72
with omegas 45.23 i get 92
with the 55.xx-53.xx i get 87-91 fps

and in 3dmark 01se. with 40.72 i get 200 points higher than the 44.67 (betas),but its solower in the regualr games.
44.67(betas) are by far greater!!!!!!

i annoy you huh.....tch too bad
well for me 44.67(betas) is reallly great,no blurryness

 

dunno...i get alot better image quality with 56.55 with rivatuner forcing 1.1 PS and VS for speed
whatever floats your boat i guess

 

lol
,
well seeing as VS can be run in software it ain't really a perf hit,

its PS2.0 that is

 

No they are not identical to the 56.55 filesize on all DLL files are different..
But yes the 56.57 sucks big time, changed back to 56.55 and got twice the FPS

 

just wait the 56.56 have gone back to programming and should cum out on 1st march as 56.58 WHQL

 

I don't know about that. I tried playing SW KOTOR with the 44.67 and i get major slow downs, all my other games were good. I tried the 56.55's and the slow down in SW KOTOR was completely gone. Everything was smooth like it should be. Older drivers don't work very well on some new games

 

Filesize can be changed easily. The code IS IDENTICAL. This is not an assumption, I've verified by doing bit compare of the dll sections containing executable code.

 

WARNING THESE ARE FAKE DRIVERS

WARNING THESE ARE FAKE DRIVERS
WARNING THESE ARE FAKE DRIVERS
WARNING THESE ARE FAKE DRIVERS

because look at the openglnt.dll Properties->Version
the dont changed with the newer Driver

with every DriverRelase this Properties Entry
is changed

v56.55 openglnt.dll 1.5.0 (change 1007857)

the Same but "newer Drivers" this must be wrong
v56.57 openglnt.dll 1.5.0 (change 1007857)

also the Driverdates from Mainfiles56.55 are 29.01.2004
the Driverdates from 55.57 are the same they should be
newer because the VersionUpgrade.

 

im talking about the 44.67 (betas)

not whql