NVIDIA GeForce 512.15 WHQL driver download & Discussion

But if done right there's no problems

I have UV/OC on CPU & GPU, RAM is set to 3800CL16 1:1 and everything is working fine.
But i've spent 2-3 weeks to do this properly - now it's Gaming only + Stable as an rock.

Now im waiting to snach some 5950X rev. B2 and will take some time to Tweak for 4000CL16 1:1

 

Maaaaaaaaaybe new driver Tuesday?

 

Likely won't work WHEA-free, even i/o-die of new 5800X3D hardly seems to get higher than 1900MHz IF clock. I'd try if 3800 CL15 with higher voltage works instead.

 

It looks like 1 new driver version a month, i'm curious what the next driver improvements will bring, but i have no complaints with the current driver

 

Yeah i know the fun of successful OC from the past indeed

 

B2 should reach it IMhO. But Yes 3800Mhz is also very fast

 

@venturi
look whats happening on this users 3090

https://imgur.com/a/J9oKxZG

 

Thank you, I don't see the issue on the 3090's in the standard driver (472), however I am using 512.16 for the 3090 ti pair, and so far have not seen the polygons. It could well be an issue with 496-512 and the 3090 cards.

 

Not fast as ddr5 tho cl32 6000 still comes on top.

 

@Alberto_It: Where are the new drivers?

 

I think they will be released in May with the release of Evil Dead game

 

But we are not going to accept that, are we really?

 

You should open another thread about the drivers not being released!

 

512.59 Studio Driver just showed up, but the Release Notes go to a 404 page.

https://imgur.com/8b1zltx

 

Hi, I'm having issues setting 10bpc for my HDR 4K TV. It only shows 8bpc. I used to be able to set this in the past with some older drivers (currently on 512.15).
Screenshots attached.

GPU: GTX 960
TV: Samsung RU7100 (supports HDR and 10bits, see https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/samsung/ru7100#page-test-results)

Help is appreciated!

 

You could try this but I would doubt if you could:

 

EDIT: wrong thread but will leave this here for reference.

Hope this is of some interest.

Benchmark analysis of drivers from 442.59 to 512.59 using custom spreadsheet I originally created to objectively analyze my raw benchmark data (see NOTE in footer).

My 1060 6GB is on its last legs and this time couldn't do the benchmarks for 512.59. It will be quite a while before I can afford to buy a new GPU so I spent a few hours entering raw data from historical and recent posts by LokkenJP over on Reddit (1070ti GPU, i7 4790K CPU, Windows 10) into my spreadsheet.

The spreadsheet summary columns to the right objectively highlight the best driver for a given category (FPS, frametimes AVG 1% 0.1%) in the games tested. Each driver is given a point / score based on how many times it is selected as the 'best' for a given game and category (see NOTE in footer).



NOTE: Spreadsheet 'summary' columns automatically selects the 'best' driver for each game in each of the 4 categories ( FPS, frametimes AVG 1% 0.1% ). If a category result 'matches' across multiple drivers for a given category the higher driver number in the result is selected e.g. if 442.49 and 512.59 have matching FPS results then 512.59 is selected in the 'summary' list. FPS figure is the MEDIAN from the 3 data points.