CD Projekt RED Announces Cyberpunk

butt hurt now? just give it a rest, with all due respect go play a game or eat some excrement .. either way

 

All those shots were taken with SSR on (Ultra-profile in-game). I wanted to compare the very best of how CP2077 could look all by itself, and how it could look on those settings with RTGI added. I actually wouldn't run it that way because a) you can probably turn some settings down while using RTGI, like some GI and AO values to claw back performance and b) I only have a humble 1080Ti, so I definitely can't run the game on Ultra! After seeing how it performs, I'm going to wait until I get a new GPU. That said, in terms of FPS hit walking around the Corp area the start with Ultra-everything my FPS was around 43 in that area in the first pics, and with RTGI enabled it dropped to 33. Turning everything to Medium preset, it went from 60 to 44 with RTGI enabled. A 2-series and certainly 3-series card will likely get away with much more.

Here is another shot of the lamp at the start of Corpo -- if anyone has an RTX card, I would love to see this same angle with full RTX features enabled to compare!

Ultra Preset no RTX


Ultra Preset no RTX with RTGI


Juxtaposition sliding comparison:
https://cdn.knightlab.com/libs/juxt...html?uid=7c593a10-3e05-11eb-83c8-ebb5d6f907df

It's pretty amazing considering this is all shader based, and RTX depends on hardware.

 

Another constructive post from you. With all due respect, I'm not the one who should feel butt hurt.

 

Again you have no proof of what is what, so you could say i was wrong regardless of what i replied.

I bought a 3090 because it is technically the superior product for 4k gaming. If i had the to option to have 20% more rasterization performance with no rt cores, i would have taken it. I have stated this maaaaany times on this site, feel free to look it up.

 

I don't need proof. I know it because I took those screenshot.

 

So we are back to "just take my word for it" - which i'm not doing with you, or anyone else. Proof or bust.

Not supplying proof of your claims is basically the same as saying your claims aren't valid.

 

Not at all.
My point from the beginning was:

 

I get that differences can be tough to see when comparing seperate images, so i made a gif where i zoomed in so much so that even the most nearsighted person in the world ought to be able to tell the difference.



Are you going to tell me with a straight face that raytracing + dlss image isn't more blurry than native ?

 

Just use this for screenshot comparisons and not a shitty gif with a 8bit color.

https://screenshotcomparison.com

https://screenshotcomparison.com/comparison/9025

 

You can't be serious comparing screenshots for clarity (resolution) like that. Compression artifacts are everywhere.

 

Or upload the images to imgur then use https://juxtapose.knightlab.com/

 

There s a nice performance guide on youtube that advises to keep the raytraced lighting on and toggle off the raytraced reflections and the game would still look good

 

I think you got the two images reversed, on mouse over is actually RT + DLSS, on mouse out is the native one.

 

Tried the RAM and Ryzen CPU fixes posted here a few pages back. Zero difference with any of those.

 

Ooops.
I got confused with the file names.
Yeah, they are inverted.

 

That site isn't working for me, but feel free to do a comparison

https://i.imgur.com/yQvyaa7.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/mKaHArx.jpg

Ps. the other people are right, that you mixed up native and dlss.

 

@Martigen your image compared to mine


Here is my direct screenshot 1440P/DLSS quality, everything maxed(everything) including RTX all on all psycho or whatever it is, my game is maxed...and yeah looks like Martys shader really looks a bit better imo. Note how the lamp is floating which under the reshade shaders, actaually adds in a drop shadow

 

It´s cool that CDR are aware of all the problems with Cyberpunk and are willing to refund everyone who wants to, but they can´t pretend that now showing the game on last gen consoles was not intentional... They didn´t show the game on purpose so they could rack all the pre orders, knowing that there are lots of people who aren´t going to bother to refund the game... Lame move.

Let´s hope they can fix this mess.

 

Did not see this posted here ... might be useful for some here. Posted on Reddit a few hours ago.
At least on PC the game may not be utilizing memory pools efficiently.

Unlock your Cyberpunk 2077 memory pool budget file to your proper PC RAM and VRAM size - Worth a try! Increases and Smooths out FPS by a lot! : pcgaming (reddit.com)

 

not complaining but the topic became too much of an RTX\RT\screenshots. i almost feel left-out with my poor poor 1070GTX

this game is really nice to look at. just give it a couple of patches.. same shi* happened with TW3 and most issues with blurry things and those type of issues were fixed. im more interested in the quests, narrative, writing.. how is it compared to TW3 ? side missions are as good ? how is the rpg system ?