AMD Ryzen 3 3300X Single Core Cinebench 15 Score Leaks

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, Apr 23, 2020.

  1. Hilbert Hagedoorn

    Hilbert Hagedoorn Don Vito Corleone Staff Member

    Messages:
    48,398
    Likes Received:
    18,573
    GPU:
    AMD | NVIDIA
    Undying and fantaskarsef like this.
  2. Undying

    Undying Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    25,353
    Likes Received:
    12,756
    GPU:
    XFX RX6800XT 16GB
    7700k was the fastest cpu only few years back and now its a ryzen 3 level of performance lol.
     
  3. Kaarme

    Kaarme Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,513
    Likes Received:
    2,355
    GPU:
    Nvidia 4070 FE
    To be fair it was the last "top" mainstream CPU of the decade of disgrace and degeneration caused by no competition in the CPU market. Matching it is no achievement. It's like saying, in the 80's, that the cheapest American car would be better than the best Soviet car. No achievement whatsoever.
     
    DeskStar, schmidtbag and Undying like this.
  4. ChampSilva

    ChampSilva Member

    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    4
    GPU:
    4790K
    If you remember 7700K is a 6700K with few mhz.

    And 6700 is 2015 CPU.
     
    Undying likes this.

  5. Kaarme

    Kaarme Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,513
    Likes Received:
    2,355
    GPU:
    Nvidia 4070 FE
    Didn't the 7000 series also have the support for lolptane? It's what Intel was doing with the Core architecture before Ryzen: They just shrank the node occasionally, upped the clocks, and upgraded features like iGPU, DDR# support, sata/usb versions, etc. Otherwise, they didn't touch the cores themselves all that much, which is best demonstrated by how the security holes revealed of late often affects already CPUs from many generations ago.
     
  6. ChampSilva

    ChampSilva Member

    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    4
    GPU:
    4790K
    Do you think intel would kept 4-cores until today? Probably 6 or 8 cores.
    Not sure about the 10c.
     
  7. hijodeosiris

    hijodeosiris Master Guru

    Messages:
    212
    Likes Received:
    83
    GPU:
    RX 6700XT
    Abso-tota-lutely, you just need to look at his still resilient idea of pricing his top dogs with retarded exorbitant out of touch prices, we would probably would get a 6/6 K version and be 1000 USD and fangays would gone super wet for their "outstanding innovation and state-of-the-art" tech used, then they would drop something with HT and be other 50% extra price.
     
  8. Fender178

    Fender178 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,194
    Likes Received:
    213
    GPU:
    GTX 1070 | GTX 1060
    I would say that if it weren't for AMD that it would have taken a lot longer to adopt more than 4 core processors for mainstream.
     
  9. jbscotchman

    jbscotchman Guest

    Messages:
    5,871
    Likes Received:
    4,765
    GPU:
    MSI 1660 Ti Ventus
    Another nail in the coffin for Intel. Seriously they gotta get their crap together.
     
  10. Kool64

    Kool64 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,658
    Likes Received:
    784
    GPU:
    Gigabyte 4070
    What's more curious is the 10900X........
     

  11. nizzen

    nizzen Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,417
    Likes Received:
    1,149
    GPU:
    3x3090/3060ti/2080t
    *in Cinebench gaming ;)
    Cinebench singlethread ≠ gaming performance
     
  12. Exodite

    Exodite Guest

    Messages:
    2,087
    Likes Received:
    276
    GPU:
    Sapphire Vega 56
    How so?

    You're not confusing it with the upcoming 10900K, right? The 10900X is the lowest end Cascade Lake HEDT chip and these aren't known to be speedy.
     
  13. Kool64

    Kool64 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,658
    Likes Received:
    784
    GPU:
    Gigabyte 4070

    No I'm talking about the X if you are to take into account it's 4.7 ghz boost that means it's either not boosting or the Ryzen chip is meeting the 4.7 boost clock for clock under single core.
     
  14. nizzen

    nizzen Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,417
    Likes Received:
    1,149
    GPU:
    3x3090/3060ti/2080t
    Overclocked and with 4000 tweaked memory -> sub 50ns memorylatency, it's faster than any Ryzen cpu in games. At stock clock and slow memory, it sux :) It's insane difference between stock and "max" overclocked.

    Yes it's slow in Cinebench game compared to 64core threadripper ;)
     
  15. Ryrynz

    Ryrynz Active Member

    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    GTX 960
    Matching what was a top end gaming processor 3 years ago at this price point is the achievement.. This is entirely the reason why you have eight plus cores now in gaming rigs rather than six..
    Screw ya head on mate.
     
    Celcius likes this.

  16. Exodite

    Exodite Guest

    Messages:
    2,087
    Likes Received:
    276
    GPU:
    Sapphire Vega 56
    From the Cascade Lake reviews I've read/seen that seems par for the course. In Cinebench single thread they seem to lag the upper-tier Ryzen 3K chips by 5-10%. With the lower core clock of the 3300X, compared to the 3800X/3900/3950X that is, this is about what I'd expect.

    I don't think it's speaking to the strength of the 3300X as much as how poorly positioned Cascade Lake was though. :(
     
    Kool64 likes this.
  17. alanm

    alanm Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    12,236
    Likes Received:
    4,437
    GPU:
    RTX 4080
    Odd that you missed the other CPUs in the list ( i9-9960x and i9-10900x ) which had the same scores.
     
  18. Kool64

    Kool64 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,658
    Likes Received:
    784
    GPU:
    Gigabyte 4070
    I'll agree with that.
     
  19. Astyanax

    Astyanax Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    17,016
    Likes Received:
    7,353
    GPU:
    GTX 1080ti
  20. JiveTurkey

    JiveTurkey Member Guru

    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    66
    GPU:
    Asus 3090
    Gaming is the only thing pushing my system.

    Any title using a single threaded engine will be like ps2 Era. So even a 50$ cpu will blow way past anything from that era. But maybe this about those 955fps v 972fps competitions in Diablo II competitions?

    Think the current sweet spot for only gaming is 8-12 cores. Going more cores will start to negatively affect the the price, top clockspeeds, and tdp. I would spend the money on a 24 core cpu if I though it would make a positive diff in gaming.
     

Share This Page