Review: Core i9 10980XE processor (Intel 18-core galore)

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, Nov 25, 2019.

  1. Hilbert Hagedoorn

    Hilbert Hagedoorn Don Vito Corleone Staff Member

    Messages:
    48,544
    Likes Received:
    18,856
    GPU:
    AMD | NVIDIA
    larsiano and kanenas like this.
  2. vdelvec

    vdelvec Member Guru

    Messages:
    157
    Likes Received:
    16
    GPU:
    Nvidia RTX 3090
    Not bad. Not bad at all. Performs pretty damn well in games and since all those graphs are stock, this will be a beast when overclocked. Besides, who's gonna buy one of these and not overclock it? Also a person overclocking one of these is not gonna give s rat's buttcheeks about power consumption.

    Maybe I should upgrade my Core i9 7980xe for this but... I liquid metal'd my 7980xe.
     
  3. kakiharaFRS

    kakiharaFRS Master Guru

    Messages:
    987
    Likes Received:
    370
    GPU:
    KFA2 RTX 3090
    speaking for myself but....the reason why I want to change from Z390 are the pcie lanes
    which prevent me from using more than 1 nvme (at the loss of 2 sata ports per nvme the cost is too high on PCH lanes)
    which prevent me from using my thunderbolt 3 pcie card
    which prevent me from using an addon usb ports pcie card
    which force me to use pcie x8 speed for my gpu
    real case scenario here I have cards taking dust because of my lack of lanes plugging them makes my sata drives disappear (when you run out of lanes they disappear even in the bios it's like they are unplugged)
    the 3950x (my mistake at the time) doesn't really fix that it adds if I understood right 4 lanes to Z390 ?! which is still not enough

    two possibilities for threadripper, either it's going to suck at gaming like the previous gen, which I expect but very much hope it doesn't or it's going to destroy Intel everywhere
    whatever it is I'm ready to pay the TR price I learned with Z390 that my use case is too extreme for a "consumer" setup
    https://i.**********/gnPpsBVN/Whats-App-Image-2019-11-22-at-15-08-10.jpg

    +1 on the power consumption, if you use that kind of HW for work then it's your customers who pay the bills or part of them, if not you don't care in the least
     
    Last edited: Nov 25, 2019
  4. wavetrex

    wavetrex Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,465
    Likes Received:
    2,578
    GPU:
    ROG RTX 6090 Ultra
    "Cheaper"
    Should have been enough.

    But not cheap enough... unfortunately.
    Especially when considering total platform cost.
     
    Last edited: Nov 25, 2019
    rl66 likes this.

  5. kanenas

    kanenas Master Guru

    Messages:
    512
    Likes Received:
    385
    GPU:
    6900xt,7800xt.
    Final words & conclusion
    Of course, you will not be purchasing an 18-core processor to play games, that would be ludicrous

    Conclusion
    The biggest competitor for the Core i9 10980XE is not at all Threadripper 3000 as you'll find out later today

     
  6. rl66

    rl66 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,931
    Likes Received:
    840
    GPU:
    Sapphire RX 6700 XT
    This CPU's price is at the price of the AMD 3900x + X570 + NVMe 1To that i have just paid.
    My new CPU look really good in bench compared to this one despite having less core (wich confirm my 1st feeling about it, coming from dual Xeon)
    Comparing AMD's mainstream to Intel's high end is not good to Intel at all, even more with the old chipset used in 2066...
    So yes, i agree with you, this is a good CPU for upgrade a 2066, but way too expensive.
     
  7. wavetrex

    wavetrex Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,465
    Likes Received:
    2,578
    GPU:
    ROG RTX 6090 Ultra
    Finished reading the entire review, and also some youtube videos.

    Oh boy Threadripper 3000 is going to demolish this so hard...

     
  8. rl66

    rl66 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,931
    Likes Received:
    840
    GPU:
    Sapphire RX 6700 XT
    Well, this is not a problem :)
    -if delited your spacer won't fit the new CPU in 90% of the case: remove the spacer+CPU+(water or air) cooler and make someone happy with it (and get his money too ;) )
    -if delited with normal IHS (btw: NEVER use copper one like you found on the net, copper is worse than actual used by Intel, it's only to milk people) then it's like a normal CPU (but then liquid metal benefit is lost)
     
  9. mackintosh

    mackintosh Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,189
    Likes Received:
    1,097
    GPU:
    .
    I haven't been this underwhelmed since Sandy Bridge.
     
  10. Kaarme

    Kaarme Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,518
    Likes Received:
    2,361
    GPU:
    Nvidia 4070 FE
    Including the price cut, this feels like a product release Intel did to buy some time until they can get a new architecture out. This should be of interest to some with the massively cut price, but all in all the results are kind of lackluster.
     

  11. bagrata

    bagrata Guest

    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    2
    GPU:
    Club3D X1550
    seriously wtf?
    it barely beats 3950X with 2 more cores and even loses in some tests
     
  12. BLEH!

    BLEH! Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    6,408
    Likes Received:
    423
    GPU:
    Sapphire Fury
    I can't see why anyone would go for this over the 3950X, it's cheaper, in most cases, faster, draws less power, cheaper motherboard, newer PCIe tech...
     
  13. kanenas

    kanenas Master Guru

    Messages:
    512
    Likes Received:
    385
    GPU:
    6900xt,7800xt.
  14. Vtech

    Vtech Member Guru

    Messages:
    135
    Likes Received:
    16
    GPU:
    MSI GTX1080
    I don't think this deserves the "Recommended" badge, not because its a bad product but because there is better.
     
    RavenMaster likes this.
  15. nizzen

    nizzen Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,419
    Likes Received:
    1,157
    GPU:
    3x3090/3060ti/2080t
    Error 404
     

  16. Hilbert Hagedoorn

    Hilbert Hagedoorn Don Vito Corleone Staff Member

    Messages:
    48,544
    Likes Received:
    18,856
    GPU:
    AMD | NVIDIA
    Hmmm? On the website?
     
  17. dirtm

    dirtm Guest

    Messages:
    7
    Likes Received:
    2
    GPU:
    Gigabyte 290x 4GB
    The clue might be in the opening paragraph.
     
  18. kakiharaFRS

    kakiharaFRS Master Guru

    Messages:
    987
    Likes Received:
    370
    GPU:
    KFA2 RTX 3090
    nice wording from Hilbert it hints at things without saying anything precise so we are still left wondering
    please be better than the previous TR at gaming please please please, daddy wants a TRX40 motherboard :D
    https://www.msi.com/Motherboard/Creator-TRX40
    like SNL Stefon would say "this has everything" :cool: (except TB3)
     
    Last edited: Nov 25, 2019
  19. fantaskarsef

    fantaskarsef Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    15,759
    Likes Received:
    9,652
    GPU:
    4090@H2O
    Honestly, I don't share the "recommended" opinion either, but to read into it that @Hilbert Hagedoorn is giving away that sticker simply because he got some help on Intel's side is pretty daring.
    I believe he has a reasoning for this in some way, I did not read the article fully (just graph scanning), but what you two say is that it's a paid review, which I honestly doubt. Let alone the personal insult a professional journalist might see in it.
     
    0blivious likes this.
  20. Dwwolf

    Dwwolf Guest

    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    R380X
    Integrity would have been waiting a few hours and releasing both tests together......
     

Share This Page