Intel launches eleven 10nm 'Ice Lake' laptop processors

i7-1068G7 - very consumer friendly to remember this exact processor name

 

Let's be honest: most consumers don't actually look at that.
Girls just want white wile dudes just want something black. Dad pays for it.

 

Integrated WiFi? How strange.

 

Most cores of my i7 9700k "are" dormant (and still no HT) .....as the true benefits of the multiple processor's core(s) to be seen, the software that is running on the computer must be written to support it....

IMO, the majority of consumers will see no tangible benefits from going beyond new processor(s) as there is so little non-specialized software that can take advantage of it. Anyway, there may be people who can consider such processors as new build but "not" for upgrade...

 

What's strange about integrated WiFi?

 

4-core ICL-U is as fast as 6-core CML-U.

 

Games are beginning to run at 6-8 cores and well optimized editor tools can fill up 8 cores or more.
I am running the 1700 and slowly it is getting better and better, because new games use the extra cores, singlecore stuff is still slow though.
If you do stuff like game and stream with encoding, the extra power needed for the encoding does not hurt you as much on the 9700k as it would on a 9600k.
A lot of the 4-6 core no HT CPUes show bad stuttering in games, if the OS is not super clean or background stuff is running.

 

You have no idea what the speed differences in IPC of ice lake or comet lake are, comet lake is unreleased, and ice lake hasn't been benchmarked.

Even if comet lake has no IPC increase over skylake, which i believe is what people expect, and ice lake has an 18% IPC increase as intel has stated (but hasn't been tested), how exactly does an IPC of 18% increase somehow make a un-disclosed frequency 4-core icelake processor faster then a 6 core comet lake processor?

I state un-disclosed because you didn't state what frequencies they are, so i can only expect that it'll be the same frequency between them.

So, if they were equal, the 6 core comet processor would be 50% faster then the 4-core icelake processor, but then add that 18% IPC increase to icelake and you'd get the 6-core comet lake processor being 32% faster then the 4-core icelake processor, so again, where is your logic, or lack thereof? Ofcourse a 4-core any processor CAN be faster then a 6-core any processor as CLOCK SPEEDS can be drastically different on them, but you didn't say a "4Ghz 4-core ice lake processor is faster then a 3.2Ghz 6-core comet lake processor", which would be moot point anyways. No, you stated simply that all 4-core icelake processors are as fast as a 6-core comet lake processor. Pure nonsense.

Seriously why are you still on these forums when you continue to troll, hard?

 

Both has been benchmarked around the internet already. Anandtech has quite indepth review and overview.

https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/13954547
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/14051899

3750H for comparison, though Intel's high performance will be 1068G7.
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/13434367

 

People believe trolls when no one calls them out for their nonsense. Not everyone who follows these or any forums are educated enough to not get pulled in and believe the pure fabrication that comes out of people like coth.

 

Aside that you personally don't add anything educated yourself. If you see something not following your agenda, then people are immediately idiots and trolls. It's easier to stick labels rather than being smart and educated.

 

Ice lake has a lot architect gains and I am sure IPC is a lot better, BUT can they fix the turbo boost up to ~5ghz?! soonish
because if they can not then IPC alone mean not a lot

 

Not my agenda, it's reality. Anyone here would be able to say that if i had an agenda, it'd be towards AMD, but i did not call you out on anything to do with AMD, this is about intel, and reality. And i did show clear information that shows you are incorrect. I didn't reply to your last post, because it shows irrelevant information. It shows unreleased CPUs that aren't 100% known what they are (no i don't mean naming, i mean what they are actually set up as) or what conditions they were tested in or what actual frequencies were used firmware and etc. as these can and do get reported incorrectly.

As i originally stated, 18% IPC does not equate 50% increase in performance, and your original statement was: "4-core ICL-U is as fast as 6-core CML-U." which by itself is not true. Again, also stated in my original reply, that does not mean a 4 core system can not beat a 6 core system, if the 18% increase in IPC comes also with a higher frequency then obviously it can close that gap, match it, or even do better. But, again, again and again, that's not what you said.

If you want to not be labeled as a troll, then state what you actually mean, because if you ACTUALLY meant that ALL 4-core ICL-U are as fast as 6-core CML-U, that's where the issue is, because that's factually incorrect.

 

Looking at the comparison to whiskey lake, there is very little I improvement (except avx). But this is expected since its pretty much an new, and yet to mature node. 10 nm + (if there is ever one) Will be interesting

 

There gotta be a 10nm+ . Coz without it how can we get 10nm++? Or more importantly 10nm+++? Hmm?

 

This is probably already 10nm+. Cannon Lake was 10nm, and the yields were horrible.

Only PCIE 3.0? Pass.

 

Well clearly he wasn't trolling and you are acting like an ass. Just man up, apologize, and move on.

Here's some more benchmarks of this "unknown blah blah..." Intel Ice Lake i7-1065G7 from an event they had yesterday here in California. They were given a system for 8 hours and had no restrictions on benchmark software, how they tested, or what. Except they weren't allowed to test noise, battery life, or skin temp.

https://www.legitreviews.com/intel-10nm-ice-lake-benchmarks-on-the-core-i7-1065g7-processor_213374