Gigabyte Pushes NVMe Aorus SSD to 15,000 MB/s on PCIe 4.0 (RAID)

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, May 29, 2019.

  1. Hilbert Hagedoorn

    Hilbert Hagedoorn Don Vito Corleone Staff Member

    Messages:
    48,544
    Likes Received:
    18,856
    GPU:
    AMD | NVIDIA
  2. Reddoguk

    Reddoguk Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,665
    Likes Received:
    597
    GPU:
    RTX3090 GB GamingOC
    Very juicy but i bet this is one of the reasons why the north/south bridge needs active cooling on X570.
     
  3. Picolete

    Picolete Master Guru

    Messages:
    494
    Likes Received:
    261
    GPU:
    Sapphire Pulse 6800
    It uses x16, so probably the CPU PCi-e lanes
     
  4. MonstroMart

    MonstroMart Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,397
    Likes Received:
    878
    GPU:
    RX 6800 Red Dragon
    Well according to Hardware Unboxed MSI confirmed it's because of PCI-E 4 and that the fan will spin only under heavy io on a PCI-E 4 nvme drive. Remain to be seen if it's true but that's what MSI apparently said to them.
     

  5. Kaarme

    Kaarme Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,518
    Likes Received:
    2,361
    GPU:
    Nvidia 4070 FE
    Games would load pretty fast, if you remove the splash screens.

    I suppose it could help 4k video editing as well, with the 8TB size.
     
  6. EL1TE

    EL1TE Guest

    Messages:
    426
    Likes Received:
    102
    GPU:
    GTX1080 SH X 2.1GHz
    This also enforces that idea of games loading super fast, i guess Playstation 5 is using something similar since it's also AMD based like PS4, but the rumors are 500GB SSD

    https://twitter.com/mochi_wsj/status/1130645990627631105
     
  7. MasterBash

    MasterBash Guest

    Messages:
    819
    Likes Received:
    18
    GPU:
    EVGA GTX970 SSC+
    Why is 4k qd1 slowly... or rarely improves? Is it because it is hard to improve 4k speed? Maybe people are clueless and they think seq speed is all that matters? I am a bit confused, but I would love to see improved 4k qd1 speed.
     
    mohiuddin likes this.
  8. Alessio1989

    Alessio1989 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,952
    Likes Received:
    1,244
    GPU:
    .
  9. BReal85

    BReal85 Master Guru

    Messages:
    487
    Likes Received:
    180
    GPU:
    Sapph RX 570 4G ITX
    False. SATA vs NMVe SSD load time is SIMILAR in load times. And we speak of 6x differences. There will be NO difference with this drive either.
     
    Venix likes this.
  10. ScottishPickle

    ScottishPickle Member

    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    9
    GPU:
    8gb DDR3 1666
    Did someone at Aorus have that info card in their back pocket for a few days before the show?
     
    tunejunky likes this.

  11. [​IMG]

    So which one of you hoes forgot about RAID?
     
    tunejunky likes this.
  12. Kaarme

    Kaarme Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,518
    Likes Received:
    2,361
    GPU:
    Nvidia 4070 FE
    Yeah, because you couldn't remove the splash screens.

    Seriously, though, the games aren't built for it.
     
  13. yeeeeman

    yeeeeman Active Member

    Messages:
    54
    Likes Received:
    18
    GPU:
    Geforce 9600GT 512MB
    If you want instant load times, just buy 128GB of memory and don't close games, just do alt-tab. Just like Android is doing.
     
  14. tunejunky

    tunejunky Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    4,455
    Likes Received:
    3,075
    GPU:
    7900xtx/7900xt
    again, i'm very impressed with the leg work done by AMD in prepping the field for x570/Ryzen 2.
    the long lead times involved means the partners were brought on at the early ES stage, after proof of yield(s).
    that is amazing to me as the (predictable) leaks didn't happen... and perhaps more than a degree of gamesmanship from AMD with (maybe) a hint of a disinformation to muddy the waters pre-release.
    the ability to get the partners to go along without leaks is most impressive, perhaps because now the partners also have bragging rights...
     
  15. JamesSneed

    JamesSneed Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,691
    Likes Received:
    962
    GPU:
    GTX 1070
    You have to realize how many GB you need to load for the average game. Once you realize it usually under 2GB and with sata you get about 1/2 a GB per second it simply doesn't matter much. I can tell a little difference when I switched over to me m2 drive but its hardly noticeable.
     

Share This Page