DLSS on Battlefield 5 tomorrow 12th February

I don't see how they were 'forced' to open source them. The code was always available to developers even prior to the GitHub posting. Adoption is arguable, depends on the tech. PhsyX is used in hundreds of games. HBAO is also very popular. Performance is also arguable.. for example lots of people go to HairWorks as an example of poor performance but show me an example of TressFX being utilized in a game on multiple assets in the same scene. You can't because it doesn't support instancing, which is why no games apply it to more than a single character. Upfront performance is better than HairWorks but scaling is worse. It's more of a question of performance vs IQ trade-off in most cases.

Either way the DirectML can utilize the tensors and Vega 7 exposed INT8/4 so adoption of DLSS like features will only increase going forward. Plus when more games utilize DXR they'll all start doing the denoising via DirectML.

 

DLSS support, I could care less, actually no I couldn't. I don't care at all and will not ever support nVidia again. Such a dirty lying company.

 

Source is this https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/DLSS_Super_Sampling_AA_Tested_Final_Fantasy/

You have now clue what you are talking about. DLSS is worthless in 3DMark because entire premise of DLSS is to use deep learning to calculate AA. Because 3DMark always has the same exact outcome, it's easy for DLSS to calculate the perfect picture. For actual games where outcome is always different, DLSS doesn't work so good.

It's like these advertisements for cleaning products on TV that have spotless result after a single wipe.

 

I think the real thing to consider here isn't TAA vs DLSS, it is Native vs DLSS, or any other superior AA vs DLSS.
I don't want a blurry image, or a overly sharp image that is creating "detail" that shouldn't be there, I want the cleanest, most accurate, aliasing free image I can get.
I don't think DLSS is going to do that. Maybe DLSS2X, but we don't know what kind of performance impact that will have. I have a feeling it is huge as no one is talking about it, and at that point super sampling is probably a better option.

 

Im at work and today is the 12th. Has anyone actually downloaded the update and tried it already or is everyone still crying about costs.

 

• Tuesday, February 12th
  • Weekly Community Highlight – Best Only in Battlefield Moment of the Week
    • Hot new OIB moment coming in with a new weekly winner! Think you’ve got a winner? Send it our way on any of the Battlefield channels. Each weekly featured clip will be awarded a Best Community in the World emblem!
• Update Notes
  • We'll be dropping our official Update Notes for you to check out before the client update releases. Dive in!
  
  https://forums.battlefield.com/en-u...ined-arms-and-update-2-2-release-amaa-and-qol

 

Weak. I really want to see DLSS in action with Raytracing running in my favorite game.

 

I look forward to updated benchmarks from the Don.

 

"GeForce RTS" ? What's RTS? I don't keep up to date with this stuff. I know what RTX is....

 

Did the BFV DLSS patch get released? Looking forward to the Guru3D review ....
February 12, 2019 3:12 PM

 

The foliage is sharper but details in the character textures are washed out. If DLSS can't compare to AA methods that don't reduce image quality I have no interest in DLSS.

 

As I wrote before. Use spare fps to increase internal render resolution. BF games are good example of game capable to do this, therefore IQ comparison there will make more sense.
(Apples to apples, Image Quality at comparable performance level.)

 

DLSS for BF5 is out. As expected it looks absolutely terrible.

DLSS OFF - https://i.imgur.com/lbLnaJA.jpg
DLSS ON - https://i.imgur.com/Bl3aPTR.jpg

 

Is that FPS relevant?

 

WOW. The DLSS image looks like crap! The game is probably internally rendered at 1080p and then upscaled to 2160p. Supersampling always sucked and it always will.

 

Meh !

 

From visual standpoint, SS is the best form of AA.

 

CiroConsentino probably just mixed up terminology and meant to say that upscaling sucks. Because obviously Supersampling is DOWNSCALING from higher internal resolution. It's the opposite of DLSS.

 

dlss option is there but greyed out and off for me?