Review: Battlefield V: PC graphics performance benchmarks analysis

The performance of the GTX 980Ti looks dubious ! It's much much worse than the GTX 1070 which it normally trade blows with. !

 

Google hardware unboxed BFV perf. , it's on track.. and literally trade blows with 1070
. Stock vs stock. Idk what happened by HH review.. maybe his 980ti crapping out..

 

Yes i just watched and it seems 980ti perform as it should. HH said in his review that his 980ti performance is odd so owners should test themselfs.

 

Does RTX impact graphics memory usage? Clearly impacts frame rates, but what about memory? Can you add RTX mode to the memory usage graphs?

 

I'm awaiting my EVGA step-up to a 2080 ti. In the meantime, I'm "rocking" a GTX 960 with average frame rates in the 30s at 1440p on the low preset with frequent drops under the 30 mark which I've never experienced until now with G-sync.

Ughhh. The new card can't get here quick enough.

 

Yeah my 980ti is performing much better than in the test never seen it drop under 70fps all ultra at 1080p

 

I am looking for insight on DX12 in this game since the latest patch the other day.

1. Is DX12 only working (without hitching/stuttering) on Nvidia cards only? Only on turing with RTX?
2. Is DX12 working with AMD cards without stuttering?

 

Nvidia not supporting their older models anymore? 980TI was king of the hill what is happening here. This bring back thought that they are deliberately hindering the performance for older models?

Why bother buying high end anymore if this is the result you can expect. Better to buy mid range and know product will be better supported. company with questionable practices?

Kepler vs Maxwell

 

Just stop it. Next you'll be wailing about how the 8800 Ultra is 'being gimped'. We don't need silly trolling like this.

 

Ag shame did I hit a nerve? I am pretty sure everybody that bought a 980TI is extremely happy now. I guess you are just one of those fanboys that support a company blindly. If you cant handle that people criticize companies that might or might not deliberately sabotage products to ensure people upgrade for profit. Then I guess competition it the market is not good and we all should just accept what we get.

Than again techspot suggest it is actually much better https://www.techspot.com/review/1746-battlefield-5-gpu-performance/

Maybe it is just guru3d altering the results. My apologies!

O.K wait after more investigation seems techspot used Dx11 and guru3d used Dx12. I guess nvidia card do not like it.

I will do better research in future, before posting in Guru3d again seems people are touchy here, and can not handle criticism.

 

Computerbase.de did a new test with DX11 vs DX12 using the latest patch. They say DX12 is alot better now, though DX11 still has a marginal advantage, though they're using an i7 8700k at 4.7 Ghz.
https://www.computerbase.de/2018-11/battlefield-v-dxr-raytracing-test/

 

The numbers on Maxwell cards are totally inaccurate and out of reality!
See the true numbers of reference clocked cards below and put to them another +15-20% with a classic overclock! Have a good day!

​

 

That's DX11.

edit: Plus we don't know which map or map zone was chosen to do the testing, result may vary heavily.

 

@Goiur yeah its DX11 and you have a point there about the map choosen but when you test all the cards under the same conditions you cannot close your eyes to the truth!

 

Makes you wonder why this site decided to make the 980ti look worse than the 1060. This "review" is hilarious.

 

Yes, trolls hit nerve, it's your intent, troll.