AMD Talks AGESA v1.0.0.6 and DRAM

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, May 26, 2017.

  1. Elder III

    Elder III Guest

    Messages:
    3,737
    Likes Received:
    335
    GPU:
    6900 XT Nitro+ 16GB
    That virtualization info sounds pretty slick, better access to faster RAM for the masses is very good news too.
     
  2. zer0_c0ol

    zer0_c0ol Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,976
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    FuryX cf
    HH will you do a review pretty pls :D
     
  3. Loophole35

    Loophole35 Guest

    Messages:
    9,797
    Likes Received:
    1,161
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080ti SC
    I'd imagine he will wait for it to be out of beta to review.
     
  4. zer0_c0ol

    zer0_c0ol Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,976
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    FuryX cf
    ppl are saying that the beta is really stable
     

  5. NiscoRacing

    NiscoRacing Member

    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    2
    GPU:
    EVGA GTX 680 4GB (WC)
    ppl still stuck around DDR4 3466?

    hoping to see DDR4 4000 soon :D
     
  6. shaga

    shaga Member Guru

    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    11
    GPU:
    Asus 3060 Ti
    Who cares about 4000mhz, compared to 3200mhz its next to nothing. Insanely hard to spot while gaming.

    You all that think 4000mhz is the thing you should do blind tests.. Just saying.
     
  7. icedman

    icedman Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,300
    Likes Received:
    269
    GPU:
    MSI MECH RX 6750XT
    People care because ryzen seams to scale well at least up to 3200mhz though it probably has diminishing returns after 3200mhz maybe it'll keep scaling who knows.
     
  8. Aura89

    Aura89 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    8,413
    Likes Received:
    1,483
    GPU:
    -
    I'm not sure i understand your post. Do you have inside knowledge that tells you 4000mhz on a ryzen system would bring no noticeable performance improvements? Because everything states otherwise, unless it's stops scaling after 3200mhz, which would have to be tested first, to prove...so have you tested it?
     
  9. shaga

    shaga Member Guru

    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    11
    GPU:
    Asus 3060 Ti
    Sorry I was drunk last night but I tried myself with Prey; had on the same quickload position +10fps 3200 vs 3000. Increased it to 3333 and tried, +2fps. That's why I stopped tweaking at 3200 as I wouldn't ever notice that 3333. Just like I wouldn't notice 4000. So going from 2666mhz(didn't test it, just 3000vs3200vs3333) to 3200 was insane boost and just pure awesome but 3200->3333 nothing to write home about..

    I use fullhd 144hz screen. Perhaps with a different resolution than fullhd it would be a different results or with some other game.

    AIDA memory bench read went from 49k to 50k with 3200 vs 3333. Latencies were the same. Not a huge difference there either.

    In other words probably gonna adjust 3333mhz to post every time and make it work but wouldn't pay any extra for a DDR4 that can hit 3333mhz..
     
    Last edited: May 27, 2017
  10. Loophole35

    Loophole35 Guest

    Messages:
    9,797
    Likes Received:
    1,161
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080ti SC
    It appears timings are more important than just speed though. Very interested to see a memory guide when some one makes it. I would probably wait for AGESA 1.0.0.8or9 to do it though.
     

  11. Venix

    Venix Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,472
    Likes Received:
    1,972
    GPU:
    Rtx 4070 super
    wide spread compatibility in ram is a good thing although the 4000 ddr4 ram kits sound something really expensive that would make sense on the r7 series and not the r5 .... else why go with r5 and 4000 mhz ram and not go with the r7 and 3200 ram ? if we assume the 4k mhz is something realistic in the near future
     
  12. Dygaza

    Dygaza Guest

    Messages:
    536
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Vega 64 Liquid
    Last edited: May 28, 2017
  13. MasterBash

    MasterBash Guest

    Messages:
    819
    Likes Received:
    18
    GPU:
    EVGA GTX970 SSC+
    any sites out there testing ryzen against intel with this new update? its a nice increase but i cant tell how close it is to intel now
     
  14. Keketin

    Keketin Guest

    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Titan XP
    Since i cannot add pictures/links here yet, i made it possible for visitors to see the chart i used to compare the results i got. Io-tech did retests with AotS after the "ryzen patch".

    So if you follow the link Dygaza posted you should now see the chart with intel processors and day 1 results of ryzen.

    I'd bet that after we get stable agesa 1.0.0.6a bioses, some sites are going to retest ryzens performance in various applications and games.
     

Share This Page