Acer Announces 35in Predator Z35 with G-sync and 200Hz

As someone who experienced 120Hz on CRT monitors long before 60Hz LCD monitors became the norm, 60Hz was never enough for me. ;>

 

Resolution is too low, this is the monitor i would love, new Asus ROG Swift PG348Q 21:9 Curved 3440x1440, IPS, 100Hz, GSynch - http://www.cnet.com/products/asus-rog-swift-pg348q/

 

Use 5120x2160 DSR. Whats the problem?

It will look closer to what real 1440p looks in terms of sharpness, at least.
Desktop use will only be MORE comfortable under this senior citizen mode.

And your dual 6gig cards are probably the best setup for that. Even tho you can forget the newer games at max settings.


Either way. There are two 100hz 3440x1440 monitors coming. Its only fitting that we get a 200hz 2560x1080 one. Both almost max the displayport 1.2

When displayport 1.3 appears we can get 200hz 3440x1440.

 

Height is like having a 28" monitor ( plus the ultra wide ) so imagine that you have to sit about ~80 cm far from monitor so you don't actually see its density and stay at sharp level. I was between 24" vs 27" 1080p (wide,you know,regualr ones..),when I saw the 27@1080p I didn't like that I would have to sit further that I used to. Same will be for this resolution on this monitor.

 

Diminishing returns comes to mind at this point.

Going from 60 to 120 or 144 = Epic, going from 120/144 to 200 ... I doubt it.

Much more interested in flatscreen technology that would have a more direct effect on the reduction of latency (as in "near CRT" like BTB and GTG). OLED maybe?

 

Oh Hell yeah. I do want this.

 

Need 322Hz to run dota2.

 

Weird...many posts here comes with sarcasm or is it stupidity..?

 

Oh damn, and I'm still running ancient 60Hz lol.

Although I'm still to find a 1440p+, IPS, 16:9, 30"+, 144Hz, g-sync monitor.

 

"100 Hz is nowhere near enough. 200 Hz would be a significant improvement but still not enough; the sweet spot for 1080p at 90 degrees FOV is probably somewhere between 300 and 1000 Hz"

Michael Abrash (Oculus cheif scientist)

http://blogs.valvesoftware.com/abrash/down-the-vr-rabbit-hole-fixing-judder/

Hopefully as new monitors come along in the next few years we will find out where the point of diminishing returns is! I also want lower input latency too, I want everything

 

Perhaps sidetracking a bit, but are you guys aware that increased polling rate on the mouse indirectly influences camera movement and screen tearing, etc?

A guy at a mice forum took some high fps camera footage at 125, 500 and 1000 Hz and compared frame updates, the change in motion on the screen was noticeably smoother on 1000 Hz.

Also wouldn't surprise me that different rules apply for virtual reality/3D.

 

LOL

144Hz + 30''+ ALONE are hard find

 

200hz? only in cs go and minecraft...

 

I know lol, guess I'll stick with my ancient Dell U2711 some more.

 

Very old news really that 1000hz mouse makes stuff smoother :infinity:

 

mehh , not impressed...

I'm set for the next 10 years with philips bdm4065uc, a 40" 4k VA, sli Vsynced @60hz, smooth as silk and no lags or motion blur, plus it cost me half those screens for some reason ,so didnt have to sell an arm and a leg.

If black levels and color reproduction is important, worth checking it out


more importantly, check if your display can do chroma 4:4:4 @4k 60hz, over display port 1.2,

http://www.geeks3d.com/20141203/how...-chroma-subsampling-used-with-your-4k-uhd-tv/

this panel passes this test fine

 

Yes, but alot of people underestimate how much 1 device it's latency can influence the other.

 

60 to 144Hz is awesome, so 144hz to 200hz I think it will be insane