Palit GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost OC edition test and review [Guru3D.com]

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by Hilbert Hagedoorn, Mar 27, 2013.

  1. Hilbert Hagedoorn

    Hilbert Hagedoorn Don Vito Corleone Staff Member

    Messages:
    48,392
    Likes Received:
    18,564
    GPU:
    AMD | NVIDIA
  2. twtaylor

    twtaylor Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,942
    Likes Received:
    6
    GPU:
    RTX 3060 12gb
    Really nice performance for a budget card. Considering the cost of your average GTX660/7850/7870, this is a bargain.
     
  3. boerenlater

    boerenlater Guest

    Messages:
    437
    Likes Received:
    34
    GPU:
    Gigabyte 610 silent
    Finally a worthy upgrade for my antique card.
     
  4. Koniakki

    Koniakki Guest

    Messages:
    2,843
    Likes Received:
    452
    GPU:
    ZOTAC GTX 1080Ti FE
    In the previous article about the 7790 I said about the 7850 that screamed more value... Well, based on this new information, I take it back, replace the 7850 with the GTX 650 Ti Boost that screams more value. I would seriously consider this over a 7850.

    But then again.. There's the 7870 that screams more value for a bit more... :D
     
    Last edited: Mar 27, 2013

  5. Assassino

    Assassino Guest

    Messages:
    115
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    650 Ti BOOST OC
    Interesting though, there is a benchmark video in youtube that shows the 7850 outperforms the 650 Ti Boost in Far Cry 3, Crysis 3, and Skyrim (with 18 mods).
     
  6. Rillipiru

    Rillipiru Master Guru

    Messages:
    315
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    660 ti 2GB
    Last edited: Mar 28, 2013
  7. Koniakki

    Koniakki Guest

    Messages:
    2,843
    Likes Received:
    452
    GPU:
    ZOTAC GTX 1080Ti FE
    ↑ ↑ ↑ Care to try "Different Level/Part" of the game tested? Or tested on different drivers etc?

    Numerous reasons for the difference in FPS and Chart Hierarchy.
     
    Last edited: Mar 28, 2013
  8. Rillipiru

    Rillipiru Master Guru

    Messages:
    315
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    660 ti 2GB
    MODERATOR - Content removed. You made your point but are slowly turning this into a weird personal trolling quest - please stop with that.
     
    Last edited: Mar 28, 2013
  9. Hilbert Hagedoorn

    Hilbert Hagedoorn Don Vito Corleone Staff Member

    Messages:
    48,392
    Likes Received:
    18,564
    GPU:
    AMD | NVIDIA
    Hey bro, i'll have a look at r7800 with 13.3 b3 next week to see if there is a discrepancy with bf3 based on drivers. The Bioshock results stand as they are though.
     
  10. DSparil

    DSparil Guest

    Messages:
    3,295
    Likes Received:
    33
    GPU:
    GeForce RTX 3080
    With absolutely no disrespect to Hilbert or Guru3d, Rillipiru may have a point here. It just doesn't seem correct that the 650 Ti Boost is seeing such an advantage in some of these benches :gape: Then again, the 650 Ti Boost will not overclock as well as a 7850 and has higher thermals. I've yet to see a 7850 that cannot hit 1050mhz core on stock voltage - much higher if you boost the voltage a notch.
     
    Last edited: Mar 28, 2013

  11. Koniakki

    Koniakki Guest

    Messages:
    2,843
    Likes Received:
    452
    GPU:
    ZOTAC GTX 1080Ti FE
    Hmm.. Lets compare 4 results. 2 of them taken near the same time about 10 months ago.

    [​IMG][​IMG]

    vs our new results taken a couple days ago.
    [​IMG][​IMG]

    Everybody can draw their own conclusions..
     
    Last edited: Mar 28, 2013
  12. Hilbert Hagedoorn

    Hilbert Hagedoorn Don Vito Corleone Staff Member

    Messages:
    48,392
    Likes Received:
    18,564
    GPU:
    AMD | NVIDIA
    Guys -- I have confirmed this and it's a specific driver related anomaly with Battlefield. All Radeon 7800 charts have been redone like 2 months ago for all tests, and it looks like I made a mistake with battlefield 3 resulting in a 5 to 10% anomaly in lacking performance which is exactly what you guys see missing.

    I'm working on it now (re-validating the entire R7800) R7900 series seem to be correct though but rechecking anyway. I will update the numbers today and reflect them in the recent reviews.

    Update : charts have been revised. This unfortunately effected the R7850 and R7870 specifically and yes, it did make a substantial difference.
     
  13. MadGizmo

    MadGizmo Guest

    Messages:
    1,396
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    MSI R9 290X 8GB 2560*1440
    Ah. Great that you've checked this. Things like that show you're not biased. Everyone can make mistakes. :)
     
  14. Koniakki

    Koniakki Guest

    Messages:
    2,843
    Likes Received:
    452
    GPU:
    ZOTAC GTX 1080Ti FE
    +1 Also small things like that shows ONCE AGAIN Hilbert is a true professional. Thank you.
     
  15. DSparil

    DSparil Guest

    Messages:
    3,295
    Likes Received:
    33
    GPU:
    GeForce RTX 3080
    ^ Thank you very much Hilbert! It definitely seemed like something was a bit off there and you nailed it.
     
    Last edited: Mar 29, 2013

  16. Rillipiru

    Rillipiru Master Guru

    Messages:
    315
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    660 ti 2GB
    Last edited: Apr 3, 2013
  17. k1net1cs

    k1net1cs Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,783
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Radeon HD 5650m (550/800)
    Any plans on an SLI review of 650 Ti Boost, Hilbert?
    I just read the one over at TPU, and if the numbers are to be believed, two of these (on stock) made up around the same performance as stock 680 or 7970 GHz.

    Probably a good chance to prove whether Nvidia's multi-GPU support is really better than AMD or not using FCAT. =b
     

Share This Page