low fps in Saints row : the third

with 11.11 getting 25-33 fps 1920x1080 everything to highest but AA-0 AND AF-TRILINIAR ? I heard amd promissed to improve but cant see anything on the horizon !

 

Some AMD **** optimalization here. For me FHD, DX11, AAx4, AFx16, Ultra Preset it works like ****, AVG 30-40 FPS with GPU usage 99%, but there are some places in the city, when it goes below 20 ...
In DX9 is not a lot better, becouse fps is almost the same 40-50 fps and GPU usage 70-80% so I think there is a optimalization problem (****ty port). CPU load is 40-50%.

 

Same here. Very low fps even using dx9

 

My 6950 crossfire seems to be fine, but there's some strange stuttering i get occasionally that's annoying but tolerable.

 

It seems like this game works better on HD 6xxx series, because i have HD 6950 2gb @ 6970, my settings: true full hd 1920x1200, DX11, all max, aniso x16, aa x2 and i don't have any problems...

 

Yea if u like gaming in 30 fps ....

 

25-30 fps is my MINIMUM fps, average is 35-45, and max 55-67, so for me is pretty good, i'm sure that amd will release better drivers with some optimisation for this & other games.

 

same crap performace for me too.

 

From THQ, READ:

www.*********.com/news/new-amd-driver-promises-to-improve-saints-row-the-third-performance/

 

Isn't there an update for SR3 already?

 

No, there was a CAP update for stuttering in SR3, not the driver for increased performance.

 

^ Thats got to hurt, as its one of their Gaming Evolved games

 

I've made up my mind and this is the last I buy from amd I think they really need to overhaul the driver department if they wanna catch up to 'green' and the only thing amd has to do is show ...whats the word ... oh yes interest !

 

Are you sure mate? Did not know that?!
Then this statement from THQ is totally unacceptable and total bs on the part of ATI.

And this statement is true, my friend with a GTX580 tells me he is getting 50FPS+ all settings on max( AA, AF etc.)

 

Yes, I was about to buy a GTX590 then I saw that kaboom video so now I will wait to buy a brand new GTX680.

ATI/AMD do not communicate with most devs before a game is released, John Carmack touched on it here: http://www.gpu-wars.com/2011/05/john-carmack-modern-graphics-cards-from.html

 

for me, dx10 runs better than dx9

 

Yup

http://sites.amd.com/us/game/Pages/game-home.aspx

 

Sorry, but image quality is not adequate to the actual requirements. I mean real requirements, becouse on High-spec PC game runs like ****.

 

whats weird is you see the amd logo at boot, yet it has problems with amd that it doesnt have with nvidia. Atleast its playable, lol. And to think people argue with me about amd having crappy support.

 

the weird thing is both gpus are at full usage.. sure the game looks good but not that great compared to other games I can run at constant 60fps