AMD FX-8150 Retail (Bulldozer) Review by lab501

Discussion in 'Frontpage news' started by king-dubs, Oct 9, 2011.

Tags:
  1. k3vst3r

    k3vst3r Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,702
    Likes Received:
    177
    GPU:
    KP3090
    turbo clock ^

    it was 2600k turbo 3.8GHz vs 8150P turbo 4.2GHz
     
  2. Hopelessness

    Hopelessness Guest

    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    XFX Radeon HD4890
    Can't help noticing that CPU-Z shows it's a B2 stepping, when the release models are to be C0?
     
  3. TheHunter

    TheHunter Banned

    Messages:
    13,404
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    MSi N570GTX TFIII [OC|PE]
    move along, nothing to see here.:leave:
     
  4. sverek

    sverek Guest

    Messages:
    6,069
    Likes Received:
    2,975
    GPU:
    NOVIDIA -0.5GB
    Please, keep that gun jumping **** away from this forums.
     

  5. TheHunter

    TheHunter Banned

    Messages:
    13,404
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    MSi N570GTX TFIII [OC|PE]
    nvm...


    edit:

    if i compare my current cpu to that preview article then it really doesnt look so good.

    3dmark 2011

    my score 6340P, physics part 5320 vs 6540 (with a 580gtx), physics 7200 (2000P more)

    RE5

    I assume its test 2 - fixed bench

    97.2FPS vs 109FPS

    So far not a worthy upgrade.. But it could be a lot better in final review, well hopefully.. 3 days to go :infinity::pc1:
     
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2011
  6. Evildead666

    Evildead666 Guest

    Messages:
    1,309
    Likes Received:
    277
    GPU:
    Vega64/EKWB/Noctua
    I agree. Its only a few days now until we will have TOO MUCH info lol ;)
     
  7. k3vst3r

    k3vst3r Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,702
    Likes Received:
    177
    GPU:
    KP3090
    Well looks like AMD is going round reviewers asking how they going to present how well BD performs :3eyes:


     
  8. PhazeDelta1

    PhazeDelta1 Guest

    Messages:
    15,608
    Likes Received:
    14
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080 FTW
    lol @ damage control. we all know what that means.
     
  9. H83

    H83 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    5,465
    Likes Received:
    3,003
    GPU:
    XFX Black 6950XT
    I have no problem believing this review. Everytime there´s a major launch, there´s always someone that breaks the NDA and puts online the review. Also the guys at Lab501 say this is a preview, like the one a site published one or two weeks ago for the new I7 3xxx series from Intel.


    Not only that but numerous rumours were saying exactly what we saw in this review, that the BD performance was not on par with current Intel CPUs.


    For me the worst is the gaming performance, so week it hurts. I hope that was on low resolutions and that on higher resolutions it delivers almost the same performance as Intel...


    Either way, we only need to wait 3 more days.
     
  10. alanm

    alanm Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    12,236
    Likes Received:
    4,437
    GPU:
    RTX 4080
    Similar to what they were trying to do with Barcelona.

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/2378/3
     

  11. chispy

    chispy Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    9,979
    Likes Received:
    2,693
    GPU:
    RTX 4090




    OMG :eek: BD FAILED.
    I knew something was up when they started to hide benchmarks and performance a couple of months ago and they kept postponing the launch over and over again , i was hoping for a healty competition between AMD and Intel this time around , but nop Intel still the best perfomer.
    Thank you for the article.
     
  12. sykozis

    sykozis Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    22,492
    Likes Received:
    1,537
    GPU:
    Asus RX6700XT
    Wow....never took you for one to post false information.

    The PhotoWorxx result was falsified.

    Core i7 2600K only gets into the 49000 range on the PhotoWorxx test at stock clocks.

    Always the best idea.....especially when a site is known to fudge numbers....

    And I can't help noticing that the PhotoWorxx score is roughly 17K higher than the reference i7 2600K score....which isn't possible at stock clocks.

    Do some research, you'll find out that some "results" are completely false....thus, meaning none of the other results should be believed.
     
  13. k3vst3r

    k3vst3r Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,702
    Likes Received:
    177
    GPU:
    KP3090
    2600k wasn't at stock though was using turbo upto 3.8GHz :)

    btw i just tested my 2600k @ 3.8GHz on photoworxx an got 68k so i dunno what you on about mate

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2011
  14. PhazeDelta1

    PhazeDelta1 Guest

    Messages:
    15,608
    Likes Received:
    14
    GPU:
    EVGA 1080 FTW
    well tbh, those gaming benches dont mean dick to me because i use vsync. so i wont be getting any more than 75fps anyways. handbrake, cinebench, 3dmark 11 and heaven are close enough.
     
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2011
  15. ---TK---

    ---TK--- Guest

    Messages:
    22,104
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    2x 980Ti Gaming 1430/7296
    you squashed a conspiracy theory against amd with 1 screenie. good job bro. I thought it was widely known that both chips were tested in turbo mode?
     

  16. Penal Stingray

    Penal Stingray Banned

    Messages:
    957
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX 680 Tri-Sli-S27A950
    I Suggest Dont Expect Too much about bulldozer ur just gonna disappoint urself.
     
  17. Xtreme1979

    Xtreme1979 Guest

    Here is a 2600K at stock clocks.

    [​IMG]
     
  18. Anarion

    Anarion Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    13,599
    Likes Received:
    386
    GPU:
    GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
    I get 64044 at 4.2Ghz (1600MHz ram) so it's probably really ram limited test. In FPU SinJulia test I get 5614. I'm using the latest stable version.
     
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2011
  19. k3vst3r

    k3vst3r Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,702
    Likes Received:
    177
    GPU:
    KP3090
    seem's benefit from memory speed does that photoworxx
     
  20. krayzieNRG

    krayzieNRG Guest

    Messages:
    929
    Likes Received:
    9
    GPU:
    EVGA RTX 2070
    I have said this so many times.
    AMD will not reach the performance they want until they drop backward compatibility.
     

Share This Page