Bad Company 2 FPS,

Turn V-sinc to ON. This will fix things.

 

I used to have two 5770's in crossfire which were only a tiny bit shy of the 5870's performance, paired with an i7 2600k. I believe this is the best performance the OP is going to get no matter what cpu he has he's only going to gain a couple of frames at most from any bottleneck.

Even if he turned down all the settings he's probably only going to average 120 fps, not minimum 120.

 

Yes it can. Damn trolls :bang:

 

not a troll, and you are wrong.

 

Are you a Optometrist? thought not, i suggest you keep your words to yourself from wherever you read it online.

 

my eyes can see the difference...i must be a creature of some sort

 

its my own experience, not something i read

 

He's not an idiot and he doesn't need to be an optomotrist. And the question can be fired right back at you hypocrite And you can also adhere to your own advice.

 

Just becaue you can't tell a difference does not mean it applies to everyone else. Maybe you didn't know but everyones eyes are different

 

Hypocrite? It's also suggested you stay out of other peoples conversations. Nobody needs your criticism.

 

have yu tried set AI to PERFORMANCE in CCC ? i found this today that this really help FPS a lOT!!!!!!!

 

ok , maybe your eyes are better than mine, but what exactly are you seeing at greater than 60 fps? more smoothness? 60 fps isn't perfectly smooth to you?


imagine you had one of those flip books where you draw on the corner of the page like this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FI-0GgTVoCk

when you say you can see more than 60 fps, you are saying you can see the changes in more than 60 different drawings being flipped PER SECOND

 

haha wtf i can see there only 1 - 5 fps ))

 

Totally disagree, above 60- fps there is no difference. Extra horsepower for this game is only useful when you have very complex explosions and **** flying out everywhere.

OC ing is the fastest way to crash the game because of Frostbites heavy usage of mutli threaded support.

I am sure you want to get 120 fps on 120hz LED LCD but the time and money spent trying to achieve this would be much better spent on 2560x1600 LCD and getting double the resolution which is double the pixels than your 1080 monitor.

 

No 60 FPS isnt perfectly smooth to me. 120 is. I need a minimum of 60FPS otherwise my eyes goes nuts. 50 vs 60 is a huge difference to me as is 120 from 60. And that flipbook is like 5fps... lol Youtube only does 30FPS btw.

All Wrong.

Besides, 1080P 120hz is better then a 2560 monitor to me... for most people 2560x1600 is too high of a res and would require SLI/crossfire.

 

I am quite sure YOU DO think 2073600 pixels of information in front of you is "better" than 4096000 pixels...

 

Oh yeah i am sure a lower DPI for a 2560x1600 looks better than a higher DPI 1080P monitor hahahaha :wanker:

 

Grab a first person shooter game, grab the mouse and spin around fast. If you can't see the difference between 60fps and 120fps then you are blind.

 

The old myth used to be the human eye couldn't see above 25-30 fps is wrong but some still use that excuse to scrimp with graphics etc 25-30 frames is where motion seem continuous but you will still notice a flicker. The faster you go the less of a flicker there is.

Also if you had one of those flip books and coloured one page black and left the other white and carried on colouring all the pages in that fashion, you would need to flip through 60 pages a second for it to produce a grey image (for the black and white to seem to mix rather than flicker both colours). This is because at 60 hertz the flicker threshold gets so smooth most can't really notice it. However the human eye especially people who train their eyes such as gamers or people into graphics work can probably notice flicker well above 60 hertz.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flicker_fusion_threshold

 

human eye can see 0-120fps ..and more than 120 fps............yu must be EAGLE....
and human eye can see 10000 x 5000 to 20000 x 10000 pixels