SSD or +4GB RAM ?

Discussion in 'General Hardware' started by Khr][st, Dec 28, 2010.

  1. Khr][st

    Khr][st Guest

    Messages:
    627
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    eVGA GTX 260
    Hello guys.

    I was thinking about getting a second set of 2x2GB RAM for a total of 8GB of ram but today I got an email from an online shop that I frequently shop from with some holiday deals.

    They have the Kingston SV100S2 / 64G for 99.5€, original price was 122€ and now I am thinking if it would be better getting the ssd and not the extra RAM.

    What do you guys think ? Should I get the RAM now and wait for later in 2011 to get an SSD or get an SSD now?

    Edit: here are the specs of the SSD http://www.kingston.com/ukroot/ssd/v100.asp

    It has a Toshiba(JMicron) JMF618 chip
     
    Last edited: Dec 28, 2010
  2. Reclusive781

    Reclusive781 Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,646
    Likes Received:
    1,061
    GPU:
    RX 7800 XT
    If all you do is gaming then you don't need more then 4GB of RAM, the extra 4GB would be sitting in there doing nothing. Unless you have some resource heavy program that actually uses more then 4GB of ram..

    I really don't think it's worth getting an SSD until prices drop and majority are affordable. SSD's are like 5 times faster but at the current prices, hell no. Also it won't contribute to general performance. Programs, files, games, etc. will load/start faster but it isn't worth an arm and a leg(Maybe first born).
     
    Last edited: Dec 28, 2010
  3. Mufflore

    Mufflore Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    14,732
    Likes Received:
    2,701
    GPU:
    Aorus 3090 Xtreme
    SSD, the Sandforce drives like the Vertex 2 are very quick.
    Extra ram will net you no benefit unless you need more memory.
    For gaming on win7 3Gb is enough.
     
  4. Mega_Death

    Mega_Death Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,395
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    7870
    SSD as suggested.
     

  5. Atlas

    Atlas Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,370
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    290 x2, Saphire reference
    Go for SSD, but not that one. Look at one that is Sandforce based.
     
  6. Mohammad.Taheri

    Mohammad.Taheri Guest

    Messages:
    256
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    MSI GTX1070TI Nuke
    SSD
    3gb for gaming in windows 7 is enugh
     
  7. Corbus

    Corbus Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    2,469
    Likes Received:
    75
    GPU:
    Moist 6900 XT
    get the SSD
     
  8. pooley

    pooley Guest

    Messages:
    191
    Likes Received:
    3
    GPU:
    xfx r9 fury
    +1 This.
     
  9. Khr][st

    Khr][st Guest

    Messages:
    627
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    eVGA GTX 260
    Thanks for the suggestions guys.

    I previously had 6GB of RAM and I usually run a few Virtual machines with various OSes to test and learn so I don't use the pc only for gaming.

    I think I will go for the +4GB RAM for now and get a better SSD later in 2011 as you said this one isn't so good.

    I hope with the new year to see some new ssd's from the manufacturers better and cheaper :)
     
  10. Mineria

    Mineria Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    5,540
    Likes Received:
    701
    GPU:
    Asus RTX 3080 Ti
    Depends on which games you play and if you don't mind it using the paging file.
    I got some games where textures get cached for faster access where 4GB isn't enough.
    SSD should give you more though, specially if you run some games that have a lot of loading for caching going on.
    If you add up to 8GB memory on your 780i board, you will need to do some reading.
    Will take a while to find good timings and voltages to get them run stable and smooth with memory installed at the limit.
    Just saying that it won't be plug and play.
     

  11. Khr][st

    Khr][st Guest

    Messages:
    627
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    eVGA GTX 260
    Yeah I know but thanks for the info anyway :)

    I previously had 6GB.

    One set of 2x1GB Cellshock and one set of 2x2GB OCZ Reapers, both sets 800Mhz CL4 2.2volts and they where running fine without any tweaking at all.

    So I think I would not have any problem with the kingstons which are just basic 800Mhz cl5 1.8volt modules.

    I still have the Cellshocks but they don't want to play with the kingstons no matter what settings I tried. The OCZ died a month ago and I got the Kingstons I have now for a replacement.
     
  12. deltatux

    deltatux Guest

    Messages:
    19,040
    Likes Received:
    13
    GPU:
    GIGABYTE Radeon R9 280
    If you use virtual machines, then ya, more RAM would be great. I need virtual machines for school, hence my 8 GB of RAM. Though, I don't use all 8 GB, so I chunked out 1 GB for a RAMDisk to speed other stuff up.

    deltatux
     
  13. Lethal Abz

    Lethal Abz Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,181
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Geforce GTX 470
    ID go for the RAM.
     
  14. scr3am

    scr3am Member Guru

    Messages:
    150
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GTX 970
    +1 for SSD. As a boot drive you will notice a major impact on system performance by upgrading to a solid state drive. Even running virtual systems 4GB ram is plenty unless you multitask on all of them at the same time which is unlikely.
     
  15. Atlas

    Atlas Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,370
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    290 x2, Saphire reference
    Those VM's are started from disks and will include TEMP / swap space. I don't now about the VM drive setup, being it real HDD's or images, but both will benefit more with SSD. Working inside any VM with an image is much faster with an SSD because seek times are limited :)

    4GB vs 8GB is almost mood when you're running those VM's from a 10 year old storage device, think about that ;)
     
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2010

  16. Mineria

    Mineria Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    5,540
    Likes Received:
    701
    GPU:
    Asus RTX 3080 Ti
    I think deltalux is using those VM's for MOAC/MCSE.
    For production you wouldn't use SSD either, a good raid with SAS and in some cases even SATA drives is still a better option.
    Price and safety for performance.
    So far I only seen some of the pioneers in the industry use SSD, they can afford testing it.

    @OP Kingston SV100S2 is gen. 1
    You should minimum get a gen 2 drive.
     
    Last edited: Dec 30, 2010
  17. deltatux

    deltatux Guest

    Messages:
    19,040
    Likes Received:
    13
    GPU:
    GIGABYTE Radeon R9 280
    Depending on the VM software used, they will allocate from system RAM before swap space and if you run several VMs at once, it will start lagging. Trust me, it's happened to me before and was solved with more RAM lol.

    deltatux
     
  18. johnny87au

    johnny87au Guest

    SSd's ftw, 4gb is more then enough for windows 7 unless you do rendering/video editing etc.. As for ssd's wait for the new Intel 25nm G3 which should be released in January :)
     
  19. xiiirolls

    xiiirolls Member

    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Palit GTX580+MSI GTX275
    Another vote here for SSD. By the way SSD value drop slower.
     
  20. Khr][st

    Khr][st Guest

    Messages:
    627
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    eVGA GTX 260
    Wow a lot of replies :)

    For now I decided to go for the extra Ram and wait for the new ssd's in 2011.

    Thnx for the help guys.
     

Share This Page