Log in or Sign up

DX 11 benchmark for ATI guys

Discussion in 'Videocards - AMD Radeon' started by gerardfraser, Oct 23, 2009.

Page 3 of 10

lorikano Master Guru

Messages:

323

Likes Received:

0

GPU:

2x Sapphire 7950@1150

dx11 - 27.9
dx10 - 43.2

dx11 ,dx10
shaders high
tessallation enabled
antistropy 16
AA4X
1920x1080

Pretty below average for dx11 ,BTW perfect benchmark tool ,no more of that 3dmark vatange crap or other benchmarking tools which I find confusing at times.

lorikano, Oct 23, 2009

#41
SpajdrEX Ancient Guru

Messages:

3,417

Likes Received:

1,673

GPU:

Gainward RTX 4070

yeah, pretty poor fps under dx11 while it looks impressive to eye, fps not.

SpajdrEX, Oct 23, 2009

#42
Funky Doodle Guest

Messages:

795

Likes Received:

0

GPU:

Gigabyte ATI HD 5830 1GB

dx10 - 22.8
dx11 - 26.2
tessallation enabled, vsync off

Mode:
1680x1050 4xAA fullscreen
Shaders:
high
Textures:
high
Filter:
trilinear
Anisotropy:
16x
Occlusion:
enabled
Refraction:
enabled
Volumetric:
enabled

Last edited: Oct 23, 2009

Funky Doodle, Oct 23, 2009

#43
nascasho Master Guru

Messages:

403

Likes Received:

0

GPU:

GV-N670OC-2GD @ 1250Mhz

lorikano said: ↑

dx11 - 27.9
dx10 - 43.2

dx11 ,dx10
shaders high
tessallation enabled
antistropy 16
AA4X
1920x1080

Pretty below average for dx11 ,BTW perfect benchmark tool ,no more of that 3dmark vatange crap or other benchmarking tools which I find confusing at times.
Click to expand...

Holy crap thats creepy, your scores are 99% identical to mine!

nascasho, Oct 23, 2009

#44
vbetts Don Vincenzo Staff Member

Messages:

15,140

Likes Received:

1,743

GPU:

GTX 1080 Ti

From what I've seen, this benchmark doesn't scale well. Now don't know if it scales bad on both crossfire and sli, but what I've seen of it crossfire..

Edit-Another pattern I've noticed. This is a benchmark for the video card, but from what I've seen it's also very cpu heavy too.

1680x1050 resolution dx11
fps 41.1 score 1035
pc all stock clocks
Click to expand...

FPS: 46.4
Scores: 1170
Click to expand...

First PC- John Dolan
5870 1gb
qx6800 stock
p43
8500 4gb

Second PC- Miller
4870x2 2gb
q6600 3.6ghz
p5q-e
8gb ddr2 800

Now in terms of numbers this might not be the best comparison, so something that would be needed to determine how this software finds the final benchmark score, is have 2 people with the same gpu, say the 5870 or something, but one have like an i7 and the other have say a q9440. It's obvious that the benchmark will take into consideration the rest of the system, but by how much though? Settings for test if 2 people decide to.
Settings
Render: direct3d11
Mode: 1920x1080 4xAA fullscreen
Shaders: high
Textures: high
Filter: trilinear
Anisotropy: 16x
Occlusion: enabled
Refraction: enabled
Volumetric: enabled

Last edited: Oct 23, 2009

vbetts, Oct 23, 2009

#45
mikeysg Ancient Guru

Messages:

3,300

Likes Received:

753

GPU:

MERC310 RX 7900 XTX

Here's my score -

mikeysg, Oct 23, 2009

#46
isidore Guest

Messages:

6,276

Likes Received:

58

GPU:

RTX 2080TI GamingOC

Miller said: ↑

FPS: 46.4
Scores: 1170

With my CPU at stock as I'm testing a few things atm and couldn't be bothered to restart the PC to overclock it again

That was using DX11 as the renderer, 4x AA, everything else as high as it can go. Tessellation was enabled but I don't know in what capacity it was working as obviously I have a 4xxx card...
Click to expand...

yeah, i enabled it to, but it wouldn't work..i saw the video, the rocks looked sick, but when i run the benchmark it looked like a 2006 bump mapping..

isidore, Oct 23, 2009

#47
seaplane pilot Guest

Messages:

1,295

Likes Received:

2

GPU:

2080Ti Strix

GTX 295 @ GPU 700MHz, Shaders 1509MHz, Memory 1200MHz

Unigine
Heaven Demo v1.0
FPS:
42.2
Scores:
1064
Hardware
Binary:
Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1500 Release Oct 22 2009
Operating system:
Windows 7 (build 7100) 64bit
CPU model:
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8500 @ 3.16GHz
CPU flags:
4477MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE41 HTT
GPU model:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 8.16.11.9107 896Mb
Settings
Render:
direct3d11
Mode:
1680x1050 8xAA fullscreen
Shaders:
high
Textures:
high
Filter:
trilinear
Anisotropy:
8x
Occlusion:
enabled
Refraction:
enabled
Volumetric:
enabled

seaplane pilot, Oct 23, 2009

#48
chaotic1 Ancient Guru

Messages:

2,841

Likes Received:

0

GPU:

PowercolorHD6970 2GB dead

heres mine lol (not done dx10 yet)

chaotic1, Oct 23, 2009

#49
Axil Member

Messages:

37

Likes Received:

0

GPU:

Windforce 670GTX x 2

my result with tesselation

without tesselation I get
a score of 2779
average fpd = 110.3

Axil, Oct 23, 2009

#50
RE3FRK Banned

Messages:

18

Likes Received:

0

GPU:

ATI HD4870 790/1050MHz

I hope directX11 does a bit better than what 10 was allowed to do as 10 for me was a peak that was never really established except mostly in BIOSHOCK. So I guess 11 has to hit the gas cause I'm on Premium atm and those 5870's look like they need some serious floor grinding.

RE3FRK, Oct 23, 2009

#51
IPlayNaked Banned

Messages:

6,555

Likes Received:

0

GPU:

XFire 7950 1200/1850

Just gonna copy paste out of the main thread for everyone.

Some more for you guys at 1024x768 no AA no AF. The rest of the eye candy is maxed though.

One GPU DX11: 35.6 // 896.
Two GPU DX11: 69.7 // I don't have the score anymore, but the FPS is right.

One GPU DX10: 59.5 // 1499
Two GPU DX10: 111.2 // 2802

So actually, at that resolution with no AA, no AF it actually scales pretty much perfectly. 90% or so?

IPlayNaked, Oct 23, 2009

#52
mikeysg Ancient Guru

Messages:

3,300

Likes Received:

753

GPU:

MERC310 RX 7900 XTX

Axil said: ↑

my result with tesselation

without tesselation I get
a score of 2779
average fpd = 110.3
Click to expand...

Man, you almost gave me a heart attack, I thought my rig's not configured right since a single HD5870 equals my score :3eyes:, then I saw the res - 1024x768 Windowed. Before I saw this, I was thinking your i7 had something to do with your outstanding score.

mikeysg, Oct 23, 2009

#53
gerardfraser Guest

Messages:

3,343

Likes Received:

764

GPU:

R9 290 Crossfire

Hey I have a DX10 card.Can some post a DX11 screenshot of road,roof,dragon so we can see what DX11 brings with 50% FPS cost.

EDIT:NVM Ertard post #34 has posted some nice screens of tess at work.

Last edited: Oct 23, 2009

gerardfraser, Oct 23, 2009

#54
lorikano Master Guru

Messages:

323

Likes Received:

0

GPU:

2x Sapphire 7950@1150

Really good .Will wait and see CF

lorikano, Oct 23, 2009

#55
lorikano Master Guru

Messages:

323

Likes Received:

0

GPU:

2x Sapphire 7950@1150

mikeysg said: ↑

Here's my score -

Click to expand...

Awesome scaling in CF

lorikano, Oct 23, 2009

#56
SolidBladez Guest

Messages:

3,710

Likes Received:

1

GPU:

GTX 1080 Ti OC

Love the demo, a lot more than Vantage *ew*.

SolidBladez, Oct 23, 2009

#57
Pablo Ancient Guru

Messages:

1,577

Likes Received:

0

GPU:

Saphire 5870 2g VapourX

Failed to launch on my 8800gtx.

Will sort out issue when get more time.

Pablo, Oct 23, 2009

#58
nascasho Master Guru

Messages:

403

Likes Received:

0

GPU:

GV-N670OC-2GD @ 1250Mhz

OC'd back to 3.8Ghz and the cards are still stock 850/1200, but now in CFX. At least it scales well with CFX enabled... microstutter central though... :/

DX11 run:

Unigine
Heaven Demo v1.0
FPS: 52.1
Scores: 1313

Hardware
Binary: Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1500 Release Oct 22 2009
Operating system: Windows 7 (build 7100) 64bit
CPU model: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 965 @ 3.20GHz
CPU flags: 3184MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE41 SSE42 HTT
GPU model: ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series 8.670.0.0 1024Mb

Settings
Render: direct3d11
Mode: 1920x1080 4xAA fullscreen
Shaders: high
Textures: high
Filter: trilinear
Anisotropy: 16x
Occlusion: enabled
Refraction: enabled
Volumetric: enabled

This time 950/1240Mhz:
DX11 Run:

Unigine
Heaven Demo v1.0
FPS: 56.2
Scores: 1417

Hardware
Binary: Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1500 Release Oct 22 2009
Operating system: Windows 7 (build 7100) 64bit
CPU model: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 965 @ 3.20GHz
CPU flags: 3184MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE41 SSE42 HTT
GPU model: ATI Radeon HD 5800 Series 8.670.0.0 1024Mb

Settings
Render: direct3d11
Mode: 1920x1080 4xAA fullscreen
Shaders: high
Textures: high
Filter: trilinear
Anisotropy: 16x
Occlusion: enabled
Refraction: enabled
Volumetric: enabled

Unigine Corp. © 2005-2009

Last edited: Oct 23, 2009

nascasho, Oct 23, 2009

#59
isidore Guest

Messages:

6,276

Likes Received:

58

GPU:

RTX 2080TI GamingOC

Axil said: ↑

my result with tesselation

without tesselation I get
a score of 2779
average fpd = 110.3
Click to expand...

lool, are you serious? the result should have been the other way around, i mean tessellation was made for fps improvement not the other way around.

isidore, Oct 23, 2009

#60

(You must log in or sign up to reply here.)

Page 3 of 10

Share This Page