[hwbot] 13616 - 4870x2 - Core 2 QX6800 @ 3.46 GHz H2O [/hwbot] http://service.futuremark.com/home.action;jsessionid=906E92543B020AA55A0A62078B4A6858
NOW you have to check as to why my old score is listed as yours ?? Sorry Thanks, Chispy, I wasn't sure about this benchmark,,, too much switching between benchies,lol. By the way thanks for the vmod info back a while ago. Like you said "very easy". I have this card at 1.25vc and 800~850(didn't want the ovp to kick in). Loving life. Now if I can buy another one I'll have more fun!
[hwbot] 15164 marks - GeForce GTX 280 @ 700/1450/1300MHz - Intel Q9550 @ 3995MHz [/hwbot] http://service.futuremark.com/home.action;jsessionid=5E477E9F8ED806FF833B880FE9AF5990?resultId=1284567&resultType=19
With PhysX 8585 - C2D E7200 @ 3.80 GHz on Air - GeForce 8800 GTS TOP 512 @ 810/2000/2240 - 2GB DDR2 800 @ 960 MHz CL5
[hwbot] 15168 marks - GeForce GTX 280 @ 702/1458/1188MHz - Core i7 @ 3.8ghz[/hwbot] http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=1290990
Read this though...it got me and tiger253 also > Please note that this result does not comply with the rules defined in the Driver Approval Policy for 3DMark Vantage and will not be visible on default result search on the ORB or on the Hall of Fame. Please ensure that you are using approved display drivers and system software versions provided with 3DMark Vantage or use the "Disable PPU" option.
I know, I know. I was trying to be polite to these 2 other guys. Telling them what I had to find out the first time. Don't want to moderate... My problem is that I'll switch between runs of 06 and vantage in win7 and don't pay enough attention lol. Too worried about making it through my shader clocks:bang:
No worries EddieG, how good is that 285 overclocking with the volt mod? I wish all gpus could be volt modded so easy lo,l I'm waiting for something to come out for the single pcb 295s now as they don't support software volt modding.
I'll tell ya that simple mod from napalmV5 over at XS, if you hadn't tried it, works for some good little boost.http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=215224 sure you are aware. I did the conductive ink thing and went from 775 max core stable to 828,1656,1465. From 1.15v load on core to 1.23 and 2.11 on mem. by bridging 3 resistors. As far as the real vmod goes, I'm waiting a week or so...no rush yet. I guess chispy is working on the revision 285. can't wait to see 900+ The board looks very different as I'm sure that 295 does. Cheers
Complete volt mod for GTX 285 (Revision 1.0 PCB) V.core + V.mem + OCP http://i4memory.com/f89/gtx-285-volt-mod-14558/ Complete volt mod for GTX 285 (Revision 1.1 PCB) Same PCB as the 2GB models ,it could be the 1Gb or the 2GB model as it appplies to the new PCB. http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=220607&page=3 http://phpbb3.ocmag.eu/viewtopic.php?f=155&t=147 * Please use Google Translator * chispy.
[hwbot] 31782 -i7 920 @4.3- 3 EVGA 280GTX HC 16's H2O [/hwbot] http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=1298943
My score [hwbot] 25,951 - 2 gtx 285's in SLI h20 - Core i7 975 @ 4.50 GHz peltier/tec [/hwbot] http://service.futuremark.com/home.action;jsessionid=CAF9DE77FC331A377BA9BB3D9589C058
^^man thats a killer cpu clock bro remember for benchmark ss's you need cpuz and gpuz:nerd: 24.7k gtx295
[hwbot]13932 - GTX280 OC @ 702/1458/1188 PHYSX OFF - Core i7 920 D0 @ 3.8GHz AIR [/hwbot] http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=1325697
[hwbot]18354 - 2 x 4890 @ 960/1075 - Q9650 @ 4GHz AIR [/hwbot] Forgot to submit my results! Doh!:bang:
