i have been a long time pc gamer and do know that ps3 has an nvidia 7800 (or something close to it) BUT i have NEVER SEEN GRAPHICS LIKE KILLZONE 2. Everything in this link is running in realtime and even if is cinema, this is to close to real CG animation with facial expression, amazing lighting and detail texture. i wish this game would come out for pc. http://www.gametrailers.com/player/44579.html?type=wmv (english is not my native language is u do find any mistake in my writings)
Looks alright. And where does it say this is using the game engine? It's probably console fanbois getting all excited over CG again :stewpid:
Dude... it's a cutscene... And I'd be more concerned with the fact that all the Killzone 2 gameplay trailers depict the most utterly generic shooter experience imaginable.
As much as I am a PS3 fanboy, I have to say that it is pre-rendered, and confirmed by someone who got the game on disk and saw the cutscene. Unfortunately
no console can beat Crysis for image quality in an open/interactive environment. Never gonna happen with the current consoles, in fact its impossible, they havnt got the memory for the textures nevermind the grunt to render such high poly count environments. Crysis is doing on average 1.2 million polygons per frame and thats with high res textures, my rig gets through 42 million polygons per second with physix @ 1680x1050 with 2xAA on high settings( at the start on the island ). Im not a huge fan of Crysis, Warhead was pretty cool and i own a PS3 but nope not a chance in hell......ever!!!!!!!
Killzone 2 does look good, its might not be as good as pc graphics, but a ps3 costs far less than a decent gaming pc. I use both, and I am looking forward to Killzone 2.
decent PC with e.g. 8800gt or 4850+decent core 2 + P45 mobo + 2 gigs decent DDR2 + harddrive = 600 euros. Here in ireland PS3 costs 400 euro, thats 200euro difference( -20 euro again for a HDMI cable ), however PC games cost 40euro, PS3 games cost 70 euro, thats 30 euro difference and would only take 9-10 games before PC cost=that of PS3 and a pc can do a lot more. I never get te argument on PC vs consoles on cost: There different business models, the manufacturers sell the consoles below cost of production and earn on the licensing of games for their platform = long term PC and consoles work out the same
A more fair comparison would be the price of a PS3 vs. a graphics card because damn near everyone has a PC now. Most people just need to slap a GFX card in their PC and would **** all over the PS3.
^ Pretty much. Pre-built pcs come with decent enough CPU's and memoery, but usually come with a ****ty GPU, so that's all you really need.
70 Euros you are getting ripped off mate. Most of my PS3 games cost be around £30. PC's are obviously more powerful, but consoles bring gaming to the masses. Some of you seem to have a grudge against a ps3 game that looks good graphically and from the previews/reviews I've read sounds very good fun to play.
Well i am put off by some of the prices like COD4 was £45 for ps3 when it came out but it was only £28 for pc. but ps3 or any console for gaming well its not my cup of tea anymore so i can't realy say how good it is without being biased.
Ok... Use consoles for what they're suited best people. Now that I've upgraded, I game mostly on PC, but I still have my PS3 for bluray and exclusives. I can't play MGS4 or LBP or GT5 on PC. I would not buy COD4 for PS3 because it simply runs better, looks better, sounds better and plays better on my PC. It's also cheaper. I'll be getting Killzone 2 for PS3 because it's an exclusive. I don't really like shooters on consoles, but all my mates are getting it for PS3 and so will I. We'll go to the midnight launch and get the game then go home and play the game. It should be good. Why do we have to compare things to Crysis every time? (it has crap ugly interiors anyway). There's nothing wrong with having a PC and a PS3 and getting the games that suit each platform the most for that platform. Best of both worlds.
If you sit as close to your TV as you do when you play PC games, you can see the massive difference in quality.
Oh....dear god........not again. cant someone make all this STOPPP!!!!:massacre: whats funny though, if you read some other forums where most members game on console only, you hear the same bias in favor of of this game and others like MSG4, but forums like this, most being pc gamers say...now way! its pretty funny actually as it is pointless.
I swear.. can the Playstation 3 can atleast have it's game to be proud of? There's always this constant bashing/hating over anything related to Sony/PS3. Look people, we have a bomb, a game that looks just amazing even for today's PC games. Nothing can be compaired to it on any consoles ever. Please, just accept it, ONCE in your life. I never cried or bashed anything because Gears of war 2 or Crysis wasn't on my console of choice, the PS3. I just smell pure jealousy.
What i want to know is why are you pimping console games in the PC gaming forum? Of course you'll get no love
Yea but you play on a tv, so why would you sit so close ? I played my ps3 on my pc monitor, it was a lower res than native but the games still look good.
