they are pretty different-at least technically. gameplay is really different too but they both play off that enhanced soldier theme.
I know what he means. Visual wise. But no, Haze is okay, but Haze looks nothing like it did in the prerelease shots. Sad, but true. Gameplay wise Also, no. Only thing is the enhancement system in Crysis and Haze. However, in Haze you don't choose what enhancement you want, and it only lasts when you have enough "juice" to.
Not entirely correct. Crysis is coming to the PS3. But HAZE is the rival PS3 games to the PCs crysis.
Crysis is not coming to PS3. Crytek are working on consoles now, that's it. We (well, PS3 users) might see projects like Crysis or not, but not a port of Crysis.
http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3167357 Edit: Er they never actually mentioning crysis being ported, but the engine. My bad Either way I played the Haze demo and the graphics are definitely no where near the ones in Crysis. It isn't a bad game though.
From what I heard they needed to compromise the resolution alot to get the level of detail it already has. You can't expect all that much from a PS3, it's not as uber powerful as sony wants you to think.
Nothing is using the PS3s power, that's why. The Cell inside if used right should be more than enough, but yeah...
Yes, please say that one more time, I'm not sick of hearing it already. The existance of a game that "Fully utilises the Cells POWER" is about as likely as the magic ATi driver that provides the magic optimisation us ATi users have all been craving.
Oooh, I'm sure you're not. Infact, I just might say it a couple of more times, if it's okay by you. Well, I'm done with that. Anyways, though it's been said over and over and over, it's the sad truth. What's even worse, I can't see developers using the actual Cell anytime soon. And as for the ATI Driver, no offence but not much hope for the 2900s...Hell, my little itty bitty onboard card is about to run it's life out soon.
