I pushed my Titan to the limit... 3DMark Score 6011 Graphics Score 5735 CPU Score 8272 Graphics Test 1 37.87 fps Graphics Test 2 32.51 fps CPU Test 27.79 fps
Scores with my exact profile clocks, no kamikaze for this one. Score = 5469 Graphics = 5561 CPU = 5001 Ran this on 365.19's, so it said not approved. Will run later when a driver with new Vulkan comes out for 980Ti.
Just a warning, watch CPU temps guys. Normally after ~4 hours of Fallout 4 or GTAV my CPU peak would be 62C, after the CPU test in Time Spy all cores peaked at 78C and my fans spun up louder than I have ever heard before. Wonder if it uses AVX or something.
nvm, seems to be bundled with advanced edition well 3dmark physics can be tough. c: Try 3dmark vantage physics test or 3dmark skydiver physics test.. These two are the hottest so far.
Ah its just basic version, still ok though.. Thought its not going to be that either. :nerd: @ factory OC 1418MHz/ vram 7220MHz; cpu 4.7GHz http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13211014? EDIT: rouge run, it driver crashed later when it switched back to desktop for physics test lol 1480mhz/vram +300mhz offset Graphics Score 6109 Graphics Test 1 40.37 fps Graphics Test 2 34.61 fps http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13212197?
i5 6600K 4.5GHz Corsair LPX 16GB 3200MHz MSI Z170A GAMING PRO CARBON MSI Gaming X GTX 1070 @max 1126mhz, +350 memory clock SCORE 6037 Graphics Score 6438]
Not brilliant, but CPU and GPU at stock and only the one card. Still got the GPU's at stock as is the CPU with HT disabled, will rerun tomorrow with the GPU's overclocked and the CPU pulled out of HTPC mode. [/QUOTE] Very impressive scaling imho.
Got a 4913 on a 7970ghz Crossfire and a 4930K. The longevity of GCN is amazing. These cards are from the the GTX 680 days. Who's laughing now about my 3gigs of vram that "will never be used before the cards are obsolete".? GPU score was a 4609.
just got done :infinity: OC the 980 Ti to its limit, CPU @4Ghz Score: 5 473 GPU: 6212 CPU: 3271 http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13213640? :nerd:
I wonder which recommendation they were using? They are quite opposed between NV and AMD. Benchmarks of the DX12 games do not quite coincide with the results of Time Spy. https://developer.nvidia.com/dx12-dos-and-donts
Amd is strong This true DX12 benchmark its to prove that GCN is better in DX12... The powerful 1070 is only 10% better than the FuryX. The upcoming VEGA will eat 10XX cards at coffee
It most likely does. That's why you're not supposed to run benchmarks using offset or adaptive voltage. Use manual voltage instead.
