What iterations per sec u get?

Discussion in 'Folding@Home - Join Team Guru3D !' started by Nagasaki, Feb 27, 2009.

  1. Nagasaki

    Nagasaki Banned

    Messages:
    1,113
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    POV 9600GT 512MB DDR3
    Any 4870 users out there that can tell me how many iterations per second you get plz?

    Im getting 175 most the time and this seems rather low to me

    Thanks :)
     
  2. Nagasaki

    Nagasaki Banned

    Messages:
    1,113
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    POV 9600GT 512MB DDR3
    *bump*
     
  3. moorglade

    moorglade New Member

    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Palit HD4850 Sonic 512MB
    Well, I have a 4850 and it's hard to say what's the average. Sometimes it's 300, sometimes it's 900. I think it depends on the protein. It also seems that using the F@hViewer window may slow it down.
     
    Last edited: Mar 2, 2009
  4. k3vst3r

    k3vst3r Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    3,703
    Likes Received:
    177
    GPU:
    KP3090
    Not sure on my iterations around 600-800

    Here's my log for my HD4830

    [16:26:15] Project: 5747 (Run 1, Clone 31, Gen 78)
    [16:26:15]
    [16:26:15] Assembly optimizations on if available.
    [16:26:15] Entering M.D.
    [16:26:22] Working on Protein
    [16:26:22] Client config found, loading data.
    [16:26:22] Starting GUI Server
    [16:28:14] Completed 1%
    [16:30:04] Completed 2%
    [16:31:55] Completed 3%
    [16:33:46] Completed 4%
    [16:35:36] Completed 5%
    [16:37:27] Completed 6%
    [16:39:18] Completed 7%
    [16:41:08] Completed 8%
    [16:42:59] Completed 9%
    [16:44:50] Completed 10%
     

  5. Nagasaki

    Nagasaki Banned

    Messages:
    1,113
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    POV 9600GT 512MB DDR3
    thanks, mines a little on the slow side for a 4870!

    150 - 200 i get :(
     
  6. Treble557

    Treble557 Master Guru

    Messages:
    424
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    EVGA GTX295/8800gtx physx
    If it's the NS per second thing, then mines in the 650 area.
     
  7. Texter

    Texter Guest

    Messages:
    3,275
    Likes Received:
    332
    GPU:
    Club3d GF6800GT 256MB AGP
    Lol...1% takes my xp2800+ about 4 hours utilizing 27-8% CPU time.
     
  8. !H'Guru

    !H'Guru Guest

    Messages:
    507
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Inno3D RTX 4090
    Well, for ati users, CCC9.3 should boost this performance. Maybe this will speed yourthings up. Havn't tested it tough...
     
  9. evolucion888

    evolucion888 Guest

    Messages:
    370
    Likes Received:
    5
    GPU:
    MSI Radeon RX 6900
    My card usually do between 210it/s to 560it/s regardless of the GUI load or driver version.
     
  10. cjanti

    cjanti Guest

    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    Powercolor HD4670 512MB
    i installed the new client 2day and joined the folding team,
    my hd4670 does ~140ips when i open the f@hviewer and the animation runs fluently,
    but after 10-15s the animation slows down and the iterations go up to ~430ips,
    thats about 3-4min for 1%
    im using the catalyst 9.3
     

  11. yoyo69

    yoyo69 Master Guru

    Messages:
    317
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    MSI GTX670 Sli
    It is protien dependant..
    And yes using the Display/viewr does slow things down..
    I find it better to use Fahmon to view the PPD totals.

    (Project: 5741 (R3, C105, G96) Credit 384 points. will vary between 1100-450 iters).
    takes about 3.5 hours per WU, 2700PPD.

    This was with my 4870 1Gb before switching to GTX275 (for folding performance more than anything else, I was quite happy with the performance of my ATI cards in games & 2D modes).
     
    Last edited: May 30, 2009
  12. bernek

    bernek Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    1,633
    Likes Received:
    93
    GPU:
    Sapphire 7900XT
    I get like 3 hours / wu and around 700-1000 iter/sec
     
  13. sykozis

    sykozis Ancient Guru

    Messages:
    22,492
    Likes Received:
    1,537
    GPU:
    Asus RX6700XT
    I'm considering picking up a geforce 9500gt pci just to run f@h on 24/7....
     
  14. DonDany21

    DonDany21 Member

    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    BFG GTX 285 OC2 1GB
    Now I'm getting 4000-4500 iter/sec
     
  15. deltatux

    deltatux Guest

    Messages:
    19,040
    Likes Received:
    13
    GPU:
    GIGABYTE Radeon R9 280
    My HD 3650 pumps out 206 iterations/sec but if I turn on the viewer, that drops to 56 iterations/sec.

    Then again I know that my GPU sucks. It only can process up to 174 GFLOPS compared to the 4850 which can process up to 1 TFLOP. Even the 4770 can process up to 960 GFLOPS.

    deltatux
     

  16. DSK

    DSK Banned

    Messages:
    17,914
    Likes Received:
    1
    GPU:
    HD5770/BenQ G2220HD
    ATI Sucks in general for folding

    but i'v still jumped 200 places in the guru3d rank lol
     
  17. deltatux

    deltatux Guest

    Messages:
    19,040
    Likes Received:
    13
    GPU:
    GIGABYTE Radeon R9 280
    I think the problem here is that the CAL doesn't look to be updated since before NVIDIA was introduced into the Folding community.

    Of course I could be wrong here since F@H isn't open sourced.

    deltatux
     
  18. salanos

    salanos Maha Guru

    Messages:
    1,301
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    GeForce GTX980 4GB (Ref.)
    Seems like a hundred thousand or so without the viewer, but I can't tell.

    With the viewer it seems to be only 30~60.
     
  19. deltatux

    deltatux Guest

    Messages:
    19,040
    Likes Received:
    13
    GPU:
    GIGABYTE Radeon R9 280
    it makes sense that with the viewer on it'll drag the GPU down since the viewer uses DirectX to render the 3D molecules ... which obviously uses the GPU. Thus, it'll drag the iter/s

    deltatux
     
  20. Zer0K3wL

    Zer0K3wL Banned

    Messages:
    3,073
    Likes Received:
    0
    GPU:
    gtx 480 850/1700/2000 h2o

    most people on list are in active tough ;>
     

Share This Page