MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ti SUPRIM X and Ventus 3X Box Photos Leak, 8GB GDDR6X - GA104

Is the 3070ti targeting 1440p? It barely have enough memory for that.

 

BS

If the game NEED that much Vram, it's likely on a very low fps. Turn down the graphics a notch, and yo will get higher fps and no drop in min fps what so ever

We don't make problems just to make them

 

I disagree. The 3070 Ti should be a forward looking 1440p card and it is not. Like you said there will be games one would need to turn down settings to get high FPS. Its kind of disappointing a card that is going to sell for $1,000 only has 8GB of VRAM. I wish they bumped it to 12GB that would have been a perfect long term 1440p card.

 

I disagree, 4k gaming will become standard in 1-2 years, 1080p or 1440p are low rez for most of the gamers, the more ram the better. NVIDIA gaming cards are not used solely for gaming they are used for rendering CGI images and animations also where Vram is a necessity.

I don't understand the purpose of this card with 8GB of vram when a 3060 has 12GB, same for the 3080ti with 12GB, its like they could not afford to buy more VRAM. It feels in terms of VRAM like a ripoff

 

The gpu itself isn't fast enough, that's the point. You will allways find a bottleneck in the system. Where it is depend of how much money you are willing to pay.
If you don't like it, don't buy it.
Then buy 3080/3080ti or 3090, and use even more money

 

nizzen is right

the amount of ram a card has is basically passive storage, a buffer... it puts textures in there but the processing unit (gpu) is pasting those textures onto objects... in a perfectly optimized scenario you have as much ram as your processing unit can process in real time plus the amount you need for storage (buffer)... that is why huge memory buffer is pointless on a low end card, it cant process it fast enough to actually mater... the 12gb on 3060 are utterly pointless...

it probably has 8gb to fill a market slot by price/performance, if they went with 12 that would also make the bus 320bit and would also probably boost performance too high...

 

4K gaming isn't nowhere near 1-2 years ahead. Tbh I'm still the only one from my friends almost that has a NON 1080 (or less)60Hz monitor. Same for 240Hz, I'm the only one having one.

I bought RX580 because people told me back then than 4GB will be useless. Here I am, 3-4 years later, never ACTUALLY used more than 4GB AFAIK. (yea I know, only 1080p). My friends are still happily playing with 1GB vram lmao

 

My Msi 3070 gaming xtrio has no issues playing games at 4k, the division2....Death stranding....Assetto Corsa Competizione.....Farcry 5 all run fine, sure if you intend on running 4k@144hz then you need more power but if your running 4k@144hz and higher then you should not be looking at a mid range gpu, so maybe i have to tone down the ultra details a bit...but at 4k there is very little difference to see between high and ultra settings in any of the games i mentioned.

 

NVidia being nuts with that 8gigs....while trash like 3060 has 12...

 

It is plenty fast for 1440p and likely limited by 8GB in a few cases. I do not want a 300w+ card so this fit the bill pretty well. For the money though it just doesn't seem to have very long legs. So I wont be buying it. If my GTX 1070 can hold on maybe I will just wait for the next round. AMD's RDNA 3 on 5nm should be pretty awesome for 1440p.

 

BS
https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pag..._graphics_performance_benchmark_review,7.html

It is already starting to show that 8gb both for the 3060ti and 3070 are on the low side, they get beaten on uhd +rt by the 3060 non ti ... The 3060 non ti achieved an average of 52fps .... So both the ti and especially the 3070 has the horse power to drive 60+ fps but they do not have enough memory to do that .... And such examples will keep coming .

 

Minimum graphics memory for PC VR is now close to 8gb. This 3070 Ti card is definitely not future-proof especially for VR.

 

Under 50 fps... Like I said, low fps.... What is the point playing on max settings to get under 60fps? Take down AA a notch, and get way better fps, and no problems with too little vram. Staged problem

If you play max setting in 4k, why on earth not buying 3080/3080ti/3090?

I guess people like to focus on the negative sides, instead for all the positive.

 

No hardware is futureproof. No matter how much it costs

 

Are you wearing sunglasses or you just ignore what ever does not serve your arguments ? 3060 non ti 52 fps 3060ti 39 fps and 3070 43 fps , both the ti and the 3070 are significantly stronger cards and if they had enough vram they would hit 60fps no problem the only reason on 4ķ the 3060 get on top by that much is because the other 2 getting vram starved .... Vram ALREADY holding back the cards and as time passes it will only get worse .

 

Doom Eternal is the the best example of modern gpus having enough power but not enough vram to handle those ultra nightmare textures are higher resolutions.

 

Strange that people with no intention to buy anything, is complaining the most on products Sad

Like I said. Buy 3080/3080ti or 3090. People buying 3070ti for 4k or/and 4k 144hz+ is stupid.... If you are buying 3070ti for 4k gaming, you are buying the wrong gpu... Must be the same people that bought Ryzen gen 1 for gaming only
Still now in 2021 most people with are using 1080p monitor. 4k is still used by a few %. Let alone 4k 144hz monitors. So If someone have a 4k 144hz monitor, they most likely have money for 3080/3080ti or 3090

Why cry about 8GB on 3070/3070ti when you can buy something else?

 

I would say there are quite a few ppl on 4k with 8gb cards, I being one of them. You just dont run them maxed out like reviewers do which makes it seem unplayable on these cards. A lot of seemingly tough to run games do very well with the right settings and with minimal visual quality loss.

 

Yes exactly, just turn a few settings down. You wont notice this in gaming anyway, other than higher fps.