AMD Radeon Software Adrenalin 22.6.1 - Windows 7/10 (Legacy ASICS) - Driver download & discussion

https://www.guru3d.com/files-detail...renalin-22-6-1-windows-7-driver-download.html

https://www.amd.com/es/support/grap...s/amd-radeon-r9-300-series/amd-radeon-r9-390x

Weird crap going around.

 

Like what?

 

still no opengl added features.
waste of time, but thanks for posting.

 

such a Weird driver release

 

Some people said it could be a security fix release but wouldn't that be mentioned in the notes?

 

Not just that. But also the fact the the uwp drivers has been weird with no control panel support and that 22.5.2 has been silently updated twice.

 

Article Number
RN-RAD-WIN-22-6-1-WIN7
Fixed Issues

• AMD Radeon™ Software may fail to install on some AMD Graphics Products such as the Radeon™ RX 6900 XT.

Known Issues

• Enhanced Sync may cause a black screen to occur when enabled on some games and system configurations. Any users who may be experiencing issues with Enhanced Sync enabled should disable it as a temporary workaround.
• Radeon performance metrics and logging features may intermittently report extremely high and incorrect memory clock values.

 

Nothing new, just a re-brand.
Legacy users stick to NimeZ drivers.

 

Releases notes mention support for even HD 6000. And the notes mention Windows Store version 27.x.x.. What Windows Store version on W7, ahahaha.

 

That's Windows Driver Store (internal component of OS)

 

Ah, so the Windows Update repos.

 

win 7, what about Workbench 3.1?

 

Downloaded them, not single one DeviceID mentioned Terascale GPU, only Legacy GCN and Polaris/Vega/Navi GPU

 

https://www.amd.com/en/support/kb/release-notes/rn-rad-win-22-6-1-legacy

 

Does this have the DX11 improvements from 22.5.2? I believe the dll names should be a easy giveaway.

 

Opened the INF files. Only legacy GCN 1/2/3, and Polaris/Vega/Navi https://pastebin.com/dmEd1pkn

Probably, no

 

No, Windows Driver Store as an operating system component located on the local hard disk. Please re-read that linked MS KB article

 

The bug reports presented very superficially, succinct, with little information, cannot be taken into consideration. So if you see that those problems have been there for a long time, it is because there have been no reports reports were written in a superficial way, with little information ... and therefore makes it difficult to investigate those problems.