Article: BaseMark GPUScore Relic Of Life benchmarks with 22 GPUs

RT can Look great. It's not just Reflections as many ppl I speak to think it is.

But Depending on How it's done. Some games Don't look better and with the added performance hit.

DLSS is a massive thing for Nvidia, anything over 4K is a pure waste of GPU power as well.

Hopefully in a couple of gens for Amd and Nvidia, RT will awesome in it's full range of effects.

AMD needs custom cores in it's next line and needs to come out swinging.

 

Why? AMD's implementation is solid, they don't need custom cores at all, all they need to do is increase the number of ops for RT, from lets say 1 to 2.

If you want dedicated cores go Nvidia. This kind of thinking is what kills innovation, when everyone jumps on the same bandwagon and calls it a day.

AMD need to do their own thing and Nvidia need to do their own thing. The only common ground is that they need to run the same games, that's it. I don't believe in parity either. F*** parity. If one vendor does something unique then good for them, it does NOT automatically mean the other vendors need to do it too.

This is why AMD yields to it's userbase because you're all crying for RT and DLSS. FFS, ask them to do something new that Nvidia hasn't done instead! Come on!

 

Very nice - I just ran a quick 3D mark and mine jumps just above 4.8ghz boost. I have PBO enabled and set to +200mhz offset and so on. But I also have the bios CPU cooler profile set to quiet...and am on X470. I have a Arctic Liquid Freezer 2 240mm (I wanted the 280, but it didn't fit in my case :'() and have done no further tweaking - so I dunno!

 

It's the next step though not the current one. I mean this is perfectly fine to test raytracing now as long as there is a realization that in 99% of the games it makes no difference at all. I have a 6800 and i enabled RT in a few games so far to see my fps tank with no visual benefit at all. The only game i played where i would say RT was a gain is Control but it's mostly because the game was built around it. All the other games i tested with RT looked like those 3d movies of a few years ago where the 3d was slapped on it in a hurry because it was the cool new thing (instead of being done properly like Avatar). RT will get there in a few years but it's not there yet. It doesn't help that the first generation of RT cards were simply not powerful enough outside of the 2080Ti and the current cards price has been inflated for a while. Basically almost nobody got a capable RT card so companies will keep for now and probably the next year or two slap RT in a hurry to be able to say they support it without taking the time to implement it properly.

 

Cool opinion bro.

 

i'm on a 360mm AIO +200mhz on pbo also with curve optimizer on and tuned per core.

 

@Hilbert Hagedoorn what card models did you run this on?

were any of the nvidia LHR?

 

Here is the score with my old 2070 Super. https://powerboard4.basemark.com/system-details/3862

My result is a bit higher than what HH got. 2379 vs 2576
I do have my vram with +600 Mhz. But that shouldn't make much of a difference.

 

Only games it makes no difference at all in are AMD sponsored games because they barely cast any rays so it doesn't cripple their shaders.

 

I would say they are the same essentially when Radeon receive`s new drivers and especially new AMD FidelityFX™ Super Resolution.

Especially when they draw less power and you have less heat.

 

This is really NVIDIA favored benchmark they use closed software unlike AMD open sourced, NVIDIA is crap company never liked their products nor them as a company. Glad that we have Intel GPU`s in now, to have options to buy something.

 

AMD are way better option

 

This is a benchmark focused in Ray-Tracing. And right now, nVidia is miles ahead of AMD in RT capabilities.
Nothing to do with open or close source software.

 

You mean NVIDIA ray tracing not pure ray tracing ?

 

Umm...

No.

 

No, DX12 Ultimate Ray Tracing and Vulkan Ray Tracing.

The same code for Nvidia and AMD.

Otherwise, please, show facts (benchmark code) than deny this. Because universal benchs are agnostic by desing.

 

He has no facts.
Everyone knows that the RT implementation from AMD is very limited.

 

3dmark path tracing is as close to pure,brand agnostic ray tracing as can be atm

 

Just a bored Troll more likely.