Leaked Benchmarks Indicate IPC Rocket Lake-S to be slower than AMD Ryzen 5000

Free shipping and no tax?
Prove it and ship it to Norway for that price

 

Have any of you seen Intel CPU prices recently? 10850K is a bargain, along with other 10th gen CPUs. You'd be crazy to buy expensive AMD right now.

 

I wouldn't call running at stock clocks in excess of 90 degrees "no problems"... that's not healthy!

 

90c in gaming, or 90c with avx 512?

 

450usd is 4600kr,before vat i think

 

1USD is 8.49kr

 

yeah google messed sth up or I typed eur
what about tax tho

 

+25% wat

In Norway we have 5 years "return if broken". Doesn't matter if the product has 2 or 3 years warranty, you get 5 years That is one reason hardware is a bit more expensive in Norway, but worth it buy a long shot

 

11900K has a futuristic looking box

 

Well, at least it will be remembered for something.

 

$1200 vs $540, enough said.. But its actually comical that an Intel 14nm+++++++ almost shits on AMD's latest and greatest in synthetic benchmarks not mention will most likely destroy it in most games. + it has a futuristic box...

 

yeah I get that sometimes too.



GN's review.
11700k looks meh.
btw can we appreciate how well 10700k does in triple A's like rdr2,hitman 3,cp2077....it's faster than 5800x.at current 290eur price it's a steal.

 

Exactly what other benchmarks showed and You were hoping for more . Failed product . Better get 10th gen if you are for Intel or wait for Alder Lake . This is SKIPPY lake at best

 

Yes, the 14 nanometers are ripe for very high GHz but at a cost of efficiency, the 5600x I own operates at 65 watts while after oc it reaches 104 watts and in ECO mode for simple internet use or for a movie it barely consumes 45 watts, So that's where AMD beats INTEL. When Intel decides to go 10 or 7 nanometers, be sure that AMD 7 nanometers will be more mature for higher GHz while it has already gone to smaller nanometer numbers in relation to the programming it has done with TSMC.
Ι am currently playing games with pbo and curve optimizer at 5GHz with performance very close compared to a 10900k clocked at 5.2 I lose about a 10% average in games that are very cpu intensive also for light burst applications I can hit 5.1GHz and I paid 310 euros for the 5600x

 

So much discussion for basically a decision which is:
- Want it cheap to buy -> get Intel (what a weird thing to write)
- Want it power efficient -> get AMD

The difference in performance for gamers is so small, that the saved money could be spent on a better GPU (if they were available for normal prices).

 

Intel i7-6950X would want a word with you

https://ark.intel.com/content/www/u...extreme-edition-25m-cache-up-to-3-50-ghz.html : Recommended Customer Price $1723.00 - $1743.00

 

tdp values are a myth
5600x tends to consume quite a bit of power,90-95w stock,for gaming since 6/12 is getting pretty high usage in modern games.8/16 is best for performance/efficiency.

 

the 5600x I own operates at 65 watts while after oc it reaches 104 watts

 

my 10700f stays at 40w in gaming

btw 45w for internet browsing is ridiculously high should be under 10w
I have firefox with 10 tabs (incl. a video playing), edge with ms office forms,ms teams running, mpc with a video paused and package tdp is reading 3-8w
I think my whole system doesn't take 45w.1070 reads 16-17w in idle (dual monitor).
that's 25w for cpu+gpu,cpu alone should never run 45w in idle/light load.maybe your'e reading from the ups ? My reading from ups is 56w whole system+one monitor

Spoiler: tdp

 

Oh dear a regression cpu from intel. For the guys in the USA you can buy a 10850k 10 core 20 threads for $279US at microcenter in store only .