No. Shadowrock 3. Max load around 72C.(pbo) Closed anti noise case. Amazing cpu, especially if you care for high fps gaming
Anad results suck, but when I saw @nizzen results I have some hopes back. Still looking at i7 11700kf as go to cpu from this placeholder i5 10500.
Saw the review yesterday and the performance is worse then expected. Don´t know if this is due to some Bios issues or the CPU is really like that. As for the power figures, they are bad as expected, but not as bad as some seem to believe because the CPU only uses more then 290W when running AX512. On more normal "uses" the CPU pulls 225w, still a lot but very far from 290w... Despite being worse then the 5800X, if Intel prices this CPU the right way, then they will sell lots of them anyway.
On the opposite front, Ryzen 5000 availability seems improving alot. In europe alot of shops are offering 5600x for 320e and 5800x 440e. So prices went down a bit.
If someone wants to compare the CPU score in Timespy with 11700k: So how does it perform VS Ryzen 5800x?
That isnt really a good comparison. My 2700x is above 5600x in that benchmark and its a much slower gaming cpu.
Then tell me what to benchmark, if nothing is good enough for you Maybe the Rocketlake is better than you want it to be? I'm sorry, but I just benchmarking this crap cpu Maybe Tombraider in a cpubound scenario is a good test? 1080p medium preset
FC5 was a nice test but odd results. Have fun with it man but until Hilbert do a proper review we can just guess whats what.
your results are clearly better because your memory is clocked at 3733 and with tight timings in the antipode Anandtech uses 3200 cl22