HP has released a new M.2. SSD in the value series, the new EX900 Pro is an SSD in that 2 GB/sec range, the rather properly volume sized 1024 GB (1TB) model which we review certainly is a capable one ... Review: HP EX900 PRO 1TB NVMe SSD
The results on Page 10 have no legends to say what is being measured, in the text or images. ie data transfer or time There is nothing to suggest whether higher or lower is better. While obvious to us tech nerds, others may not know. Luckily its the page that matters least, the results are close.
Not sure if this makes really sense. I can get the same performance (most time same controller) for 100$ or less, or "faster" drives for 120-130$
great review, but is there problems with the second paragraph on page 1. "Now in the year 2018???" All the data in that paragraph looks like its been lifted from a 2 year old review. Sub $200 dollars for a 500GB, hmmm I paid less than £200 for a 2TB. Can you please update this paragraph to reflect current state of play?
Seems like the fact there was no write hole combined with the high 4K QD1 read performance might be quite a nice real world practical performer....it probably punches above it's weight vs it's more obvious spec performance numbers that are kinda underwhelming. (I haven't included comparative price as a factor though, because might not be good value for the price, I'm just talking about the performance.)
